I finished it too; the discussion here is important, and signifies what the novel can engender for utopian representation in Trek. Will that utopia end now?
My questions are
--- a continuation of my earlier post about the lack of follow up to Bashir's letter from The Crimson Shadow, and continuity things like the lack of Reta Kelanis or an allusion to Garak's stability with Parmak. (And how will the novel tie into Enigma Tails, the novel I am looking forward to this year?
)
--- why does Control actually try to stop Bashir and Data at the end if their mission is its mission? It seems like conformity with narrative expectations - that there must be a terrible fight at the end of the story, costing the heroes their lover or body. Ultimately, this felt a bit forced, especially since Control wanted them both to delete Uraei. Must we always have a fight. Structurally the in media res opening also felt unnecessary.
--- What will happen to L'Haan and the other surviving directors...did Control kill them or will the cabal continue, in a new form?
--- Will we ever see Admiral Ross again??? Or is he dead too?
Things I really enjoyed
--- The chapter from Uraei's 'perspective' deciding and accounting for the fates of Admiral Ko and Ikerson; I wonder what happened to Rao too.
--- The overall implications - Mack, as he did with Vanguard, to an extent deconstructs the Federation as we understood it, portrays its morality far more complexly than is generally afforded.
Things I am not sure of
--- the novel, as someone says upthread, essentially condones Control and/or S31 by suggesting its methods have resulted in the Federation surviving. I think this needs more critique or thought. Further it recalls the handling of this in Hollow Men, and also the conflict that resulted in the Obsidian Order which McCormack wrote of in The Crimson Shadow - I did want Garak to allude to this with Bashir, to explain shadowplay better, but also to condemn it in the way that good intentions go awry (rather than his 'are you sure?' refrain at the Castellan's complex). Perhaps this is one of the roles the 22nd century story plays, and it is well-done, recalling Mack's other 22nd century narrative very well!
--- I really hoped Jedburgh would turn up - it does feel like Hollow Men is the red-headed stepchild of S31 novels, when it is such a beautiful novel!
Regarding the reception of the novel
Regarding some people's reading of the novel as 'everything in Trek is the result of Control', I want to ask - how reliable a narrator is the Control we see in the novel? Especially the grandstanding - and seemingly contrary-acting - Control seen in its final chapters...
My questions are
--- a continuation of my earlier post about the lack of follow up to Bashir's letter from The Crimson Shadow, and continuity things like the lack of Reta Kelanis or an allusion to Garak's stability with Parmak. (And how will the novel tie into Enigma Tails, the novel I am looking forward to this year?

--- why does Control actually try to stop Bashir and Data at the end if their mission is its mission? It seems like conformity with narrative expectations - that there must be a terrible fight at the end of the story, costing the heroes their lover or body. Ultimately, this felt a bit forced, especially since Control wanted them both to delete Uraei. Must we always have a fight. Structurally the in media res opening also felt unnecessary.
--- What will happen to L'Haan and the other surviving directors...did Control kill them or will the cabal continue, in a new form?
--- Will we ever see Admiral Ross again??? Or is he dead too?
Things I really enjoyed
--- The chapter from Uraei's 'perspective' deciding and accounting for the fates of Admiral Ko and Ikerson; I wonder what happened to Rao too.
--- The overall implications - Mack, as he did with Vanguard, to an extent deconstructs the Federation as we understood it, portrays its morality far more complexly than is generally afforded.
Things I am not sure of
--- the novel, as someone says upthread, essentially condones Control and/or S31 by suggesting its methods have resulted in the Federation surviving. I think this needs more critique or thought. Further it recalls the handling of this in Hollow Men, and also the conflict that resulted in the Obsidian Order which McCormack wrote of in The Crimson Shadow - I did want Garak to allude to this with Bashir, to explain shadowplay better, but also to condemn it in the way that good intentions go awry (rather than his 'are you sure?' refrain at the Castellan's complex). Perhaps this is one of the roles the 22nd century story plays, and it is well-done, recalling Mack's other 22nd century narrative very well!
--- I really hoped Jedburgh would turn up - it does feel like Hollow Men is the red-headed stepchild of S31 novels, when it is such a beautiful novel!
Regarding the reception of the novel
Regarding some people's reading of the novel as 'everything in Trek is the result of Control', I want to ask - how reliable a narrator is the Control we see in the novel? Especially the grandstanding - and seemingly contrary-acting - Control seen in its final chapters...