Chiefs just know.How did he recognise that though? O'Brien still had the lieutenant rank pips at the time. The hollow "chief" pip wasn't invented until 'Realm of Fear', just before 'Emissary' IIRC.
A little of both I suspect (similar to the RN system where WO2 (no longer awarded) was equivalent of SCPO/MCPO and WO1 is equivalent of CMC/COB. There is no separate payscale.
Technicially true, Warrant Officer 1 (WO-1) has been discontinued, however both the USN and the USCG continue to appoint Chief Warrant Officers (USN: CWO-2 to 5, USCG CWO-2 to 4).
However, you might be thinking of the USAF, which discontinued use of them by 1980 (promotions by 1960) in favor of using the new Senior Master Sergeant and Chief Master Sergeant ranks in their place.
How did he recognise that though? O'Brien still had the lieutenant rank pips at the time.
The hollow "chief" pip wasn't invented until 'Realm of Fear', just before 'Emissary' IIRC.
Not exactly. Although Realm of Fear is the first time we see O'Brien wearing the single hollow pip, the first time we saw anyone doing so was Gillespie in Night Terrors, although it remains unclear if he was intended to be a Chief or if he was meant to be an Ensign and costuming screwed up. Memory Alpha does call him a Chief, for whatever that's worth. Regardless, Chief Brossmer in The Next Phase also wore the single hollow pip and was referred to in dialogue as "Chief."The hollow "chief" pip wasn't invented until 'Realm of Fear', just before 'Emissary' IIRC.
We might well pretend that his two pips in TNG were of some different color from the commissioned officer pips, discernible to Sergey and others but not to the audience. O'Brien has two pips in late DS9, too - they just happen to be part of a symbol also involving three chevrons.
Yup, sudden dramatic need to emphasize the fact that Barclay outranks O'Brien. The writers had been more or less in agreement about that already, but now the costumers got on the wagon, too.
It's just too bad that the number of pips went down, so we can't easily plead that his earlier two pips were "always black". At best, we can argue they were "always bronze" or whatever, which makes for a rather complicated system.
Timo Saloniemi
And even that is diluted a bit by two distinct possibilities:
- That "I am 34 years old!" is the demented rantings of a has-been who cannot even recall his own age, and his colleagues are too embarrassed to contradict him (which doesn't alter Kirk's now-confirmed birthyear of 2233, just the timing of "The Deadly Years").
- That he could be the CO of the hero ship at a rank lower than Captain (he does wear just Commander braid in the first pilot, and pleading "different braid system" sounds increasingly hollow now that evidence from multiple eras, TNG, ENT, 2230s, piles up to suggest an unchanging system).
That Kirk of the Prime universe would be exceptionally young at promotion to Captain is never stated or suggested, which in itself might be telling. There's that bit from "The Menagerie", too:
Since Pike obviously isn't born the same year as Kirk, Mendez must be meaning Pike got his promotion at about the same age as Kirk (indeed, the whole point of the dialogue is to paint a picture of a man who used to be Kirk's spitting image in every respect - only now he's a wreck of a man, and we in the audience must view with dread that it could perhaps happen to our hero one day as well).
"The same age as Kirk" can then be defined as "your age now as we speak, Jim - you of course were a bit younger when you got your own promotion, some time before that Corbomite nastiness" or "the age you were when you got your own promotion - you of course are a bit older now". Only the former interpretation would have any hope of making Kirk special. But it's the less fitting match for Mendez' clipped turn of phrase.
(Yes, yes, we also have to decide whether "Fleet Captain" is a higher rank than the one Kirk is holding, or the same rank. If the former, then we learn that Pike, not Kirk, is the one with a good claim to record speed to rank. If the latter, it's a tie. Either way, "Kirk is not special" is the safe bet.)
Timo Saloniemi
^ But who's to say Kirk went right to the academy out of secondary school?
The Making of Star Trek, and probably the writer's guide, also says something like: "Kirk was the youngest Academy graduate to be assigned as a starship command captain." Not the youngest to have the rank of captain in Starfleet, not the youngest person to command a star ship, but "the youngest academy graduate to be assigned as a starship command captain".
in "Court Martial":
COMPUTER: James T. Kirk, serial number SC937-0176CEC. Service rank, Captain. Position, Starship command. Current assignment, USS Enterprise.
Lt Commander Dax captained the Defiant, albeit during the war. The captain of the Nebula-class USS Prometheus may have been a Lt Commander too.
He was indeed intended to be a Lt. Commander, though costuming screwed up and he wore a Lieutenant JG's pips.. Also, the writer meant for the Prometheus to be a smaller ship. A Nebula class is basically a Galaxy class without the neck between the saucer and secondary hull, and therefore would likely have enough of a crew to warrant an O6 Captain.The captain of the Nebula-class USS Prometheus may have been a Lt Commander too.
Worf pretty much was the CO of the Defiant, and he was a Lieutenant Commander. Strangely enough, no one ever referred to him as "Captain" even though he should have been as per naval tradition, like they did when Dax was in command during the war.Realistically, the CO of a Defiant-class (as opposed to Sisko who was mostly the CO of DS9) should be a Lieutenant Commander
He was indeed intended to be a Lt. Commander, though costuming screwed up and he wore a Lieutenant JG's pips.. Also, the writer meant for the Prometheus to be a smaller ship. A Nebula class is basically a Galaxy class without the neck between the saucer and secondary hull, and therefore would likely have enough of a crew to warrant an O6 Captain.
Worf pretty much was the CO of the Defiant, and he was a Lieutenant Commander. Strangely enough, no one ever referred to him as "Captain" even though he should have been as per naval tradition, like they did when Dax was in command during the war.
No, the ship really was Worf's command. The matter is even laid out between the two of them in Apocalypse Rising:I suspect that is because there was an (unseen) formal transfer of command to Dax vis-a-vis the Defiant during the war (as Sisko was officially part of Ross' staff at the point) whereas Worf or Kira (who outranked who there? It was really confused sometimes) were basically doing an extended "Officer of the Watch" rotation with Sisko still technically being "in command" of the Defiant (or at least her mission) even if he wasn't actually on board.
Does that make sense?
Indeed, when Sisko isn't on the Defiant, Worf has always been in command, even when Kira was aboard, and she had to follow his orders. This actually was consistent throughout most of the series. The only exception was Tears of the Prophets, when Sisko had to leave the bridge due to his Prophet-related business, Kira took command despite Worf being there. That is an oddity that's never been explained, and indeed, considering Bajor had a non-aggression pact with the Dominion, it's really inappropriate for a Bajoran Militia officer to take command of a starship that's part of an offensive against Dominion territory.WORF: It would take a fleet of Klingon ships to breach the station's defences. I say we take the Defiant and go looking for them.
O'BRIEN: I'm with Worf.
KIRA: I'm glad the two of you are in agreement. But with the Captain gone, I am in charge of the station and I say we stay.
WORF: You may be in charge of the station, Major, but I command the Defiant.
No, the ship really was Worf's command. The matter is even laid out between the two of them in Apocalypse Rising:
Indeed, when Sisko isn't on the Defiant, Worf has always been in command, even when Kira was aboard, and she had to follow his orders. This actually was consistent throughout most of the series. The only exception was Tears of the Prophets, when Sisko had to leave the bridge due to his Prophet-related business, Kira took command despite Worf being there. That is an oddity that's never been explained, and indeed, considering Bajor had a non-aggression pact with the Dominion, it's really inappropriate for a Bajoran Militia officer to take command of a starship that's part of an offensive against Dominion territory.
In a real world setting, Sisko shouldn't have been able to take command of the Defiant away from Worf anymore than an Admiral could take command of the station from him. Indeed, note that Admiral Ross had no actual part of the station's chain of command when he actually set up shop on the station in season 7. But of course, this is a TV show and Sisko is the lead, so of course he's going to boot Worf out of the Captain's Chair when he shows up on the Defiant.As far as the rest, you could still interpret that as Worf saying that "(he) commands the Defiant, in Sisko's absensce." (which as you pointed out above, is generally true. However, Sisko is consistently depicted as the Defiant's CO when on board, so basically, what Worf is saying is that he replaced Kira as the Defiant's XO (which IMO is entirely proper, the ship should have had at least a couple of dedicated senior staff from Day 1).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.