• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Next year’s ‘Star Trek’ reboot may have naked aliens and swearing, CBS digital chief says

You, known the more I think about it, Trek has dabbled in Native American religions. Starting in TNG's "Journey's End" and continuing (IIRC) with Chakotay on Voyager.

Also, all of those Klingon epidosdes. Those people can't stop talking about the afterlife. Honestly, the whole Klingon culture makes a lot less sense without a religion. Its not just about philosophy or secular honor either.
 
Last edited:
Some think so. ;)
It has a belief system, and people argue about it. It has a hero who died to save others, then rose from the dead. It has stories designed to teach lessons about said belief system. It tells of the world to come.

Sounds like a religion to me! lol

EDIT: It even has a Reformation (Kelvin Timeline). And people have very strong feelings about that.
 
It has a belief system, and people argue about it. It has a hero who died to save others, then rose from the dead. It has stories designed to teach lessons about said belief system. It tells of the world to come.

Sounds like a religion to me! lol

EDIT: It even has a Reformation (Kelvin Timeline). And people have very strong feelings about that.
Does that make Forbidden Planet Judaism?
 
I think the increase of adult subject matter in iconic texts is just the way they happen to evolve. Just look at the 007 franchise: in Quantum of Solace, M uses the "s" word, Skyfall saw the first ever use of the "f" word while there was some more milder profanity continued in Spectre. None of it was necessary and, frankly, took me out of the film for a split second. I question the need for the profanity. Does it make it more modern? Is it meant to be edgier? But, I can't see it killing the show, just like the 007 films.
 
CBS was Trek to be contemporary. I think we can assume the techno babble will be reduced quite considerably this time around.

"Lt, I need communications online!"

"Intercom is f***ed, Captain!"
 
Obviously he [Fuller] was not up to the task.
Conspiracy theories and the evil empire CBS sticking it to the beloved Fuller, when it doesn't seem that way to me at all.

Precisely. It doesn't seem that way to you, just as it does seem that way to them. In reality none of us know exactly what happened backstage and who tried to "stick it" to whom. Or even if that's the case. Without facts, your conspiracy theory about Fuller's inefficiency is just as valid as the "panicky" people's theory about evil CBS's butchery. So you see, there's nothing "obvious" about it at all. Obviously.
 
Last edited:
It's not a conspiracy theory..it's based on available evidence..Which includes several public announcements. Going over and above that is a conspiracy theory, not vice versa...

RAMA

Precisely. It doesn't seem that way to you, just as it does seem that way to them. In reality none of us know exactly what happened backstage and who tried to "stick it" to whom. Or even if that's the case. Without facts, your conspiracy theory about Fuller's inefficiency is just as valid as the "panicky" people's theory about evil CBS's butchery. So you see, there's nothing "obvious" about it at all. Obviously.
 
CBS was Trek to be contemporary. I think we can assume the techno babble will be reduced quite considerably this time around.

"Lt, I need communications online!"

"Intercom is f***ed, Captain!"
As much of a tech/science aficionado as I am, I still felt the latter seasons of Voyager and DS9 were too technobabble heavy. This is one of the most successful ways JJ Trek revitalized the series. ie not to go too in depth with the details. I honestly think the shows lost a decent percentage of fans from that.

RAMA
 
It's not a conspiracy theory..it's based on available evidence..Which includes several public announcements. Going over and above that is a conspiracy theory, not vice versa...

What available evidence exactly? CBS' announcement about Fuller (himself) stepping back (and not getting fired)? CBS' announcement about Fuller remaining as executive producer? Or perhaps Fuller's interview about him choosing American Gods over Star Trek Discovery? Because Discovery wouldn't let him comment enough on social issues? Which available evidence and public announcements support your theory about Fuller "not being up to it" exactly? Because everything available to us right now actually contradicts you.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't have to be a thumbs up thumbs down situation. I mean, consider that TNG took three years to get its footing. It's not a death-sentence even if the show does starts out sucking. It all depends on the commitment of CBS to make it work.

One year. Come on. Season two was pretty good. Season three was excellent.
 
I'm all for R rated stuff in Trek, so long as they add it only when the plot actually calls for it, and don't gratuitously add it in just because they can.
 
We have heard some profanity before in Trek. It's just been mild and limited. Spock saying "Go to hell" in TUC and Data saying "OH SHIT" in GEN, iirc. I seriously doubt DSC is going to sound like it was written by Quentin Tarantino. But an occasional "shit" or "goddamn"? Probably not something to get worked up about.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top