• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What's in YOUR 'head canon'?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Both have been done to death, which is one reason I want dwelling on affairs and marital troubles to be left to soap operas and left out of Trek. Sure, we want to know more about the characters we love. We are also very often far better off not getting what we're so convinced we want.
It can be done well. I was re-reading parts of David R. George III's Provenance of Shadows last night. That told a wonderful story that largely turned around Leonard McCoy's love life, but I wouldn't describe it as "soapy" by any stretch of the imagination. By the end of it, I felt like I'd seen McCoy in a whole new way, which is a pretty damned impressive accomplishment with a character who had existed for 40 years by that point.
 
People are still people, with multiple facets. If you tell it in such a way that it complements the story rather than distracting, confusing, or annoying the viewers/readers, it belongs. Ideally, no episode would be solely based on relationships, but we do have times in our life where our jobs take a back seat to our interpersonal connections.
 
It can be done well. I was re-reading parts of David R. George III's Provenance of Shadows last night. That told a wonderful story that largely turned around Leonard McCoy's love life, but I wouldn't describe it as "soapy" by any stretch of the imagination. By the end of it, I felt like I'd seen McCoy in a whole new way, which is a pretty damned impressive accomplishment with a character who had existed for 40 years by that point.
I'm reading this now. An interesting theory regarding McCoy, took me a while to be sold on the idea but it is believable considering he remained a bachelor for so long (well they all did.)
 
When we leave science fiction content behind, or just make it window dressing for relationships problems, that's where I think we lose perspective. Maybe we lose sight of what these series exist for. Next Gen did too much of that. All the later series did.

It's best when done economically.
 
When we leave science fiction content behind, or just make it window dressing for relationships problems, that's where I think we lose perspective. Maybe we lose sight of what these series exist for. Next Gen did too much of that. All the later series did.

It's best when done economically.
Most of the SF content in TOS was window dressing. It was never about telling SF stories, but about telling stories about people and ideas in a SF setting.
 
The Star Trek concept was a western in space or so the story goes.
Sort of. It was pitched as the SF version of the Adult Westerns popular at the time. One was Wagon Train and that figured in the pitch. They, like Trek, used a particular setting to tell stories,but the ideas in those stories were not exclusive to Westerns.
 
That would explain stories like "Mudd's Women". Some pioneer themes are pretty universal (attacked by strange people groups, new diseases to catch, men needing/wanting wives for companionship and help, orphan kids, etc...) but seeing them in outer space kind of makes them exciting.

I wonder what "Little House On The Prairie" would look like in space?
 
I wonder what "Little House On The Prairie" would look like in space?
You have to ask?
Firefly4_L.jpg
 
I have seen Firefly, just didn't care for it much. :shrug:

Although - and here's headcanon again - Nathan Fillion as Garth of Izar in DSC :D

(I actually hope they do that, BTW. Not only because I think he'd do well as Garth, I also want to see the steam rising from Browncoats' heads at one of their own actors jumping ship to the other side, as it were. :evil: )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top