No I am positive, they were aliens, with exceptional adapting abilities, as Spock said, I think.
Fair enough, it's been a long time since I saw that episode.
No I am positive, they were aliens, with exceptional adapting abilities, as Spock said, I think.
Fair enough, it's been a long time since I saw that episode.
Finished episode 17. They're working hard to bridge the gap between ENT and TOS which I appreciate, with the Suranite's, the Klingon disease, the forging or an alliance between Andoria, Vulcan, whatever the Tellerites planet is, and Earth, but I'm still not feeling it. The shows still boring for the most part - likely because of the lack of any real danger. The characters still aren't interesting and the twists are not earned. Malcolm worked for Section 31 all along? But section 31 not having contacted him for years because there was no danger to Earth? What about the whole Xindi plot line? What about Daniels cabin and future tech, section 31 didn't want any of it? Those wasn't serious enough things to activate their agent? It stinks of retconning, which is too bad because if it had been planned from the start (or at least part way through) they could have done some brilliant stuff with it. There could have been an "omg his actions suddenly make so much more sense" moment - instead we have - "what?" and at the end of the two episode mini arc it's all over and meaningless anyway.
Also, T'Pol and Trip are linked telepathically because they mated? But that was a year ago, why are they only sharing visions now? Shouldn't Trip have shared her addiction/disease symptoms if he's immune to the Orion pheromones because she is? Why would a psychic link cause them to share physical immunities?
Anyway, the mirror episodes are up. I have seen them before, years ago, and remember them being good - especially Hoshi![]()
Although I don't quite agree with you on the characters - I find them quite interesting, in fact the Archer's crew is the crew I found I have most affinity for, I agree that some of the story arcs could be explored a bit further, and yes a good example would be Malcolm's connection with Section 31.
I watched the two Mirror episodes last night but found that I didn't like it. Somehow I found the crew's badness unconvincing - I kept thinking they were just pretending, instead of being their bad self.
Archer's crew is not what I have a problem with in that series.
Errrr.... actually I was responding to Wayoung's posting, but would be interested to know what the problem is in that series from your perspective.
There are so many things, but I think they could all be summed up by this: "Bad writing".
There are so many things, but I think they could all be summed up by this: "Bad writing".
Retconning was standard operating procedure for Trek. Presumably you hate all the other series for the same reason?It stinks of retconning, which is too bad because if it had been planned from the start (or at least part way through) they could have done some brilliant stuff with it.
When it's badly done like this? Absolutely. When it's more smoothly done, makes sense for the character /plot and effectively used moving forward? No.Retconning was standard operating procedure for Trek. Presumably you hate all the other series for the same reason?
.
Weller's character is pretty similar to Admiral Marcus in ID. I wonder if that was intentional in ID or not. Marcus' great grandfather?
.
I don't know what you mean by similar. He's played by the same actor but usually that doesn't mean anything.
It would be like arguing that the Klingon lawyer that defended Archer was an ancestor of Martok for example. I don't think you have a leg to stand on.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.