However, the original series (Re-broadcast in Japan around the 1970s) had fairly poor ratings, and it lasted only a few weeks on the air.
I don't think that broadcasting history of "a few weeks" is exactly right.
Kor
However, the original series (Re-broadcast in Japan around the 1970s) had fairly poor ratings, and it lasted only a few weeks on the air.
I don't think that broadcasting history of "a few weeks" is exactly right.
Kor
I'd be amazed if sales of TAS on Blu-ray cover the costs of the remastering.
It's nothing to do with fingers on pulses.I don't think CBS/Paramount have their finger on the pulse of fan desires at all. How can they be so out of touch?
DS9 will probably be the last series to get Blu Ray. Voyager is a better candidate sales wise. DS9s ratings during its original run is a stigma it will never shake with execs.
As far as I know that's not really true. Or it's an overstatement, at most. Deep Space Nine's effects for most of its series run were produced just as they were on The Next Generation: with optical effects done in camera. The vast majority of ship effects were done with physical models, CG models were the exception, not the rule. Also, Odo's morphing effects are such a minor part of the show, that I'm wondering why they are always brought up in these discussions. All in all I'm not convinced, Deep Space Nine would be a bigger remastering endeavour than TNG. I get it, DS9-R would generate fewer sales than TNG, but let's be honest here: It wouldn't be harder to do a remastering.All of the files for the effects shots (it was mainly computer generated, not filmed like TNG) ...
I don't think CBS/Paramount have their finger on the pulse of fan desires at all. How can they be so out of touch?
The vast majority of ship effects were done with physical models, CG models were the exception, not the rule.
Personally, I'm far more interested in TAS on Blu-ray than DS9 or Voyager.
This comment and the "like" for it depresses me.
I think it's just the fact that there are people out there that prefer TAS to DS9...Why? I wouldn't be depressed if they had decided to do Deep Space Nine or Voyager instead. Hell, I wanted TMP remastered and it is no where in site.
Life goes on...
I think it's just the fact that there are people out there that prefer TAS to DS9...
I'm sure you're right !I'm sure there are people out there that prefer lots of other things to DS9. Or TOS or TNG, for that matter.
I think it's just the fact that there are people out there that prefer TAS to DS9...
Not exactly. Season 4 is only when they began to do select episodes with a lot of CGI in place of miniatures, ala "Starship Down." M is right on the money when he says the vast majority of ship effects were done with physical models. They didn't switch to entirely replacing models with CGI until Season 6's "Sacrifice of Angels." And even after that, Gary Hutzel's VFX team continued to shoot motion control miniatures on 35mm film until his last supervised show late in Season 7. All told, roughly 20% of DS9's episodes, around 35 or so, use CGI for ships exclusively in place of physical models. Unfortunately I don't remember the exact count, but Digital Muse's David Lombardi and Bruce Branit are credited with a combined 28 DS9 episodes on IMDB from 1997-1999.From season 4 onward, CGI replaced physical models.
I don't think CBS/Paramount have their finger on the pulse of fan desires at all. How can they be so out of touch?
DS9 will probably be the last series to get Blu Ray. Voyager is a better candidate sales wise. DS9s ratings during its original run is a stigma it will never shake with execs.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.