• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers STAR TREK BEYOND

At first I thought it was a terrible, terrible scene from Beyond. I panicked!
I thought it was terrific as a commercial..almost felt like the tour of the surface of a memory alpha planet and then the "machine" pops up.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Hewlett%20Packard%20Enterprise%20The%20Machine%20Star%20Trek%20Beyond%20promotional%20image_zpsail5f9fn.jpg


http://www.thetrekcollective.com/2016/06/hps-machine-coming-to-star-trek-beyond.html

Over the course of several months, team members from Hewlett Packard Enterprise – from researchers and engineers to industrial designers and UX specialists – collaborated with the creative minds behind Star Trek Beyond to develop three conceptual technologies for the film, all based on HPE’s biggest and most ambitious research project – The Machine.

Without giving away the plot, Ms. Freeman said one technology that will appear in the movie is called the Quarantine, which is basically the data center of the future. "It is a fusion of hardware and software that enables all of the possibilities of data science and the IoT," she said.

Another technology that will appear in the movie is called the Diagnostic Wrap, a data-harnessing tool, Ms. Freeman said. "It is the future vision of the internet of things -- how enterprises of all kinds will be able to benefit form a hyperintelligent IoT. All of these concept technologies are based on what The Machine will enable."
 
Last edited:
Right, because why in God's name would Star Trek fans ever watch to re-watch any or all of the movies? These things should be watched once, once only and then destroyed. Good God, what was I thinking??

:rolleyes:
You were probably thinking, "Is this all that I am? Is there nothing more?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
I am looking forward to seeing how Idris Elba is able to be menacing and evil whilst only being able to express emotion with his body and his voice.

That one scene with Uhura in the trailer gives me life! He is great.
I was thinking, though, that since him and Sofia are covered with make up they could have easily given them some no-make up cameos in the movie as background characters on the Dubai set

I have noticed that differently from the last movie, there isn't too much promotion for Krall the villain. Most of the attention in terms of new characters is all on the alien gal we still have to discover who Lydia Wilson and Joe Taslim will play.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

That's so cool! I see the Starfleet academy uniforms by Kaplan are back there! I loved those!

Interesting that Uhura's line in the commercial is different, but that's not uncommon. They constantly manipulate lines too in trailers, or sometimes use different takes than those used in the movie.
 
Considering just how different the two displays are, I'm more likely to chalk it up to the advert having an inaccurate model than anything else. (That's if it even is the Enterprise.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
I really don't understand why they moved the nacelles closer together? That was the worst thing they could've done with the design, in my opinion.
 
IMO, "The Machine" sounds more reminiscent of 1984, not Trek. :wtf:

Kor
Information makes the oppressed even more powerful, as we have seen over the last decade or so around the world.

In fact, "The Machine" sounds like something we've seen but has been ill-defined for years in Trek: doutronics (which supposedly has quantified all data in the Federation/galaxy that is known) and the Memory Alpha planets where all the information is backed up and can be accessed. Hopefully we'll get to see a more well-realized "computer core" as well.
 
The average human gets 2.21 billion heartbeats in a lifetime. Let's say each movie is roughly two hours. At a resting pace of 60 bpm for a healthy person (although not necessarily true for Trekkie couch potatoes), that's 86,400 spent watching things we might already have seen 10 times. Looking at it that way, is a binge watch really worth giving a slice of our life?
Right, because why in God's name would Star Trek fans ever watch to re-watch any or all of the movies? These things should be watched once, once only and then destroyed. Good God, what was I thinking??

:rolleyes:

You were probably thinking, "Is this all that I am? Is there nothing more?"

Yep, you nailed it. All I ever do is rewatch Trek movies and nothing more.

Are you sure you're on the right forum?
Yes. So I must wonder if you are. Do you see anything familiar in my previous post? I'll make this easy for you: It was an exercise in humorous (probably to me only and, apparently, Kor - thanks Kor!) self-aware irony (or perhaps self-parody) from my post about wasting heartbeats on rewatching Star Trek movies, yet making a revealing reference to a Star Trek movie I've rewatched many times - made obvious by making the reference any Trekkie knows.

The answer to my first post above - about heartbeats - from any self-assured Trekkie could simply be "Yes!"
 
Last edited:
I really don't understand why they moved the nacelles closer together? That was the worst thing they could've done with the design, in my opinion.

Totally agree. I can reconcile every other design decision on the JJprise bar this, even the oversized nature of the nacelles themself.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top