You repeatedly told us what Pegg "literally" said (that is the word you used), which he actually did not say.if you want to nitpick and use semantics, it goes both ways and thus your interpretation of his words (read post above) isn't what he 'literally' said either, it's words you are putting in his mouth (in other words: your interpretation. In other words, no more valid than mine) to fabricate your own explanation of what he meant beyond the quote itself
I gave what was obviously an interpretation based on what he said, and never tried to assert that it's something he actually said.
That's the difference.
I have no idea if Pegg's treatment of female characters will be as good as his treatment of the male characters. There is no evidence to base an opinion on, only general chat about the writing process, and past examples.and again, before declaring the man a 'good example' and take for granted that he improved his writing for women, wait for the movie or at the very least wait for an interview from him that vaguely hints he doesn't only talk about the guys and their dynamics because so far I read nothing that suggests that.