..
Well observed.
TWD:
So, we see this behavior is nothing new, yet for whatever reason, Strand is painted as the villain for protecting his resources and safety, and not wanting to listen to this questionable group.
- Season two: Hershel initially wanted to help Carl, then argued several times for Rick's group to leave.
- Season three: Rick flatly refused to accept Tyreese's group.
- Season three: Rick refused to rescue the backpack man on the road, which guaranteed the man's death.
- Season six: Rick argued with Daryl about not even looking for others to bring in. He only changed his mind after disaster struck the ASZ, and Carl was shot.
And for those incidents listed above, those people realized their mistake later on. Certainly Hershel was wrong on many levels... but he was able to grow out of it.
Strand seems to be very solid in his stance, so we (many audience members) don't expect any attitude change this season.
I'd nominate you for that award, if you hadn't unilaterally voted on it.You're the winner of the 2016 Missing the Point award.
The bug you seen to have up your ass about Strand completely ignores facts:
- The Travis group would be dead if not for the plan Strand already had in place (house / boat). From the moment they boarded its been constant ungrateful, hostile behavior, when they conveniently forget that if they remained in L.A., they would be dead from the bombings, or walkers.
- So, Madison and Travis trust and accept Daniel--a man who tortures--yet they are acting like Strand is this series version of the Governor. See an extremely warped sense of morality & judgement from those two?
I don't doubt their morality is shady in those situations. But the difference is - Daniel put his "safe place" and his family on the line for Travis & Madison's family, and himself, where he could have been shot by the soldiers. And Daniel in fact lost his wife due to helping the family...so they feel like they can forgive Daniel's "sins" and can trust him with their lives.
[*]Constantly arguing with and now threatening the person responsible for their lives not ending in L.A. is the height of ungrateful, asshole behavior, and only keeps conflict center stage, when the focus should be on escape and survival.
You also missed the point that common decency can go out the window, but property rights and privacy rights -- both human-made rights, trumps helping people who would otherwise die.So far, the series paints a clear picture of who is trying to survive, and who is interested in creating conflict.
And as people have mentioned with Alex...if those other survivors were able to see the boat's name, or worse, the faces of the passengers.. expect some vengeance if they survive further. Contrast that to Madison...who I expect in season 3 to be rescued by Tobias in gratitude for saving him early on.
I think most people would agree that they don't like Travis & Madison & family... and that we all think Strand is one of the most interesting characters on the show, but as a "person", we don't like or trust him.
However, I am very interested to see if some of the theories here of who Strand really is will pan out. And if so, what do you say if we find out that the boat isn't actually his, or the reason he is in jail is because of that theft and/or murder of the real owner?