There will probably be a version of "rebirth" in production soon.I imagine the New 52-ness of the in-continuity DCUAO movies (we really need to think of a simpler term for those) will be reduced a bit following DC's Rebirth initiative.
I imagine the New 52-ness of the in-continuity DCUAO movies (we really need to think of a simpler term for those) will be reduced a bit following DC's Rebirth initiative.
And Hamill really, really can't do the Joker voice anymore, he needs to follow through on the promise -- that he's made multiple times -- that he's going to hang it up.
Well, perhaps the motion comic I watched was edited, but that stuff happens "offscreen," so to speak. It's mentioned later, and the photos are shown to Commisioner Gordon at the carnival (with no nudity shown for Batgirl, and "007-in-Casino-Royale" nudity for Gordon), but it's something that is implied and not shown. But I haven't read the comic...I just saw the hourlong audio/visual comic on YouTube, so I don't know. I assumed it included all the pages and panels.
My point is THAT, to me anyway, would be pretty much PG-13 today. Since it's mostly left to the imagination and not shown explicitly. The producers did mention in the featurette that by the standards of today, they might sneak by with a PG-13. But maybe it's framed or interpreted differently in the actual film that makes it hit harder psychologically, enough for the MPAA to deem an R rating was warranted.
I guess I was more than happy with the work that John DiMaggio did in Under the Red Hood.
Yeah...that was my thought too. I figured they'd do this in the style of the old animated series, but this looks kinda low-rent and like they rushed to get it done, cut corners, something.The style doesn't bother me, but the animation is surprisingly jerky.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.