Its a cola.This is a silly topic.
Is it Soda, Pop, or Soda Pop?
Different names, same product. If you want operational differences I refer you to the tech manuals for TNG and DS9.
Its a cola.This is a silly topic.
Is it Soda, Pop, or Soda Pop?
Different names, same product. If you want operational differences I refer you to the tech manuals for TNG and DS9.
They are the exact same product made by different manufacturers hence the different name.
Or... a holodeck needs a gigawatt of electricity to run and a holosuite needs 1.21 gigawatts to run.
Different ranking in different organizations.What's the difference between an admiral and a general?
And you didn't say which Admiral/General.Different ranking in different organizations.
Right. So when Starfleet puts a holodeck in a starship, it's a holodeck. When Quark puts it in a mostly stationary civilian station, it's a holosuite. There don't have to be differences in functionality, there's just differences in how they're used. Training and free recreation for a crew vs. to make money for Quark.Different ranking in different organizations.
There is no money in the 24th century.I would assume the main difference is Holodecks were 10x the cost of Holosuites due to Government and Military procurement practices. They simply changed the name to fool the auditors.
There is no money in the 24th century.
Just watch "First Contact"
IIRC, in ST:FC when Picard is going into the Dixon Hill program, he enters a largeish area called a Holosuite which is subdivided into several rooms each of which is called a Holodeck.
Or maybe it's the other way around.
Too, given what we know of Quark...'holosuite' sounds like a place where one would do 'naughty' things vs. a 'holodeck' which sounds like normal...business.
There's plenty of money. Just watch Deep Space Nine.There is no money in the 24th century.
Just watch "First Contact"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.