I thought it was a nice "next step" to the NCC 1701. Even Doug Drexler once hypothesized the the NX eventually becomes the 1701 through various refits.
Why must the universe be so inbred?
I thought it was a nice "next step" to the NCC 1701. Even Doug Drexler once hypothesized the the NX eventually becomes the 1701 through various refits.
Because it's cool.
I like the idea because it adds a greater depth of history to the ship, makes it more generational and fixes some continuity.I don't find small universe syndrome cool, at all. YMMV.
I like the idea because it adds a greater depth of history to the ship, makes it more generational and fixes some continuity.
If you can appreciate an Akiraprise design and the same old Trek stories, music and shooting style that Enterprise had then it's not all that different from small universe syndrome. Frankly, anything with a saucer and two nacelles in the 22nd century is small universe syndrome. Heck, calling it Enterprise should be small universe syndrome enough for you.
I like the idea because it adds a greater depth of history to the ship, makes it more generational and fixes some continuity.
It's actually attached at both points sort of. It attaches at the rear of the saucer and to the two booms.I think I'd like the refit more if it wasn't quite so close to the TOS ship. How about if the secondary hull was attached to the rear array rather than the saucer?
The refit looks to me to have replaced everything except the saucer.
The only real change besides the bolt on parts was that they relocated this part to the secondary hull. But other than that, the NX-01 was unchanged, besides the secondary hull and extra support pylons.Nothing got replaced. The secondary hull is merely bolted on the underside.
To each their own, but I didn't like the idea of the NX-01 evolving to literally becoming NCC-1701. I think being a fore runner of NCC-1701 is enough of a connection. I like the idea of NX-01 and NCC-1701 being two separate and distinct ships.I like the idea because it adds a greater depth of history to the ship, makes it more generational and fixes some continuity.
If you can appreciate an Akiraprise design and the same old Trek stories, music and shooting style that Enterprise had then it's not all that different from small universe syndrome. Frankly, anything with a saucer and two nacelles in the 22nd century is small universe syndrome. Heck, calling it Enterprise should be small universe syndrome enough for you.
That Kirk's ship was the first Starfleet ship named Enterprise.What continuity does it fix?![]()
But the movie Enterprise and TV Enterprise is ok? They are very different ships too when you look at them in detail.(And I have to agree with BillJ... saying the NX-01 and the NCC-1701 were the same ship doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me.)
Except the NX wasn't prominent in the 600 episodes and movies that take place after it.Sharing a name when it takes place more than a hundred years prior to another series doesn't make for small universe syndrome. Especially a name that is prominent in human history. Neither is using a basic design, that just makes it a consistent universe.
The crew compliment of the Constitution class jumped from 200 to 500 between when we first saw her in Pike's era and when we last saw her in TUDC.But saying one ship morphed from holding 80 to over 400 over the course of a century is non-sense.
That Kirk's ship was the first Starfleet ship named Enterprise.
But the movie Enterprise and TV Enterprise is ok?
That Kirk's ship was the first Starfleet ship named Enterprise.
But the movie Enterprise and TV Enterprise is ok? They are very different ships too when you look at them in detail.
What I think Doug was talking about was that through a lot of refits it would eventually become the future Enterprise..
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.