• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if we were foolish enough to accept what he wrote at face value, how incredibly stupid is it to post that you have a law firm willing to represent you pro bono, but basically in the very next sentence diss them and post that you hope to get a real good law firm instead. :cardie:
 
Alec Peters said:
I noted one know-it-all blogger said it would be impossible for us to find pro-bono representation. Well, as with just about everything else this newly minted IP expert posted on that blog, that is just wrong.

Dear Mr. Peters,

As a concerned former fan of Axanar, I feel obligated to point out the areas where you are making yourself look like an arrogant, egotistical shithead bad. It is my hope that this will help you when you step away from the keyboard and into the courtroom. Hopefully this will prevent you from being laughed out of court losing your case before it begins.

I have, of course, thoroughly edited this missive to ensure that it meets with your personal standard of revision.

The first issue at hand is your reference to a certain blogger. If you wish to appear less like a fucktard more professional, you could simply drop the term "know-it-all". Without that word, that sentence could appear to be completely professional. Instead, you come off like you're still in second grade as unnecessarily antagonistic, and it only serves to weaken your position.

Second, the phrase "newly minted". In addition to the same point as regards the term "know-it-all", the following issues apply (presuming that we know to which blogger you are referring (because duh!)):
  • You fail to back up the assertion that this individual is not an expert. That you say it, does not make it true. This makes you look like a complete asshole like a vindictive jerk like a child as though you are casting unwarranted and unsupported aspersions.
  • Even if you had supported it, the individual in question has never professed to be a lawyer -- quite the opposite in fact -- and even posts a disclaimer to that effect in the footer of most posts. This results in the inescapable conclusion that you are nothing more than the aforementioned vindictive asshole trying to start a fight by provoking the blogger in question.
  • The individual in question is professing an opinion. This is allowed behavior on the Internet, and in all other facets of life. To be such a condescending prick attempt to cast doubt on him in such a childish fashion only strengthens his credibility, while simultaneously diminishing your own. For you, even bothering to bring this up is a lose-lose scenario.
Finally, your assertion of "just about everything else ... is just wrong". I do hope, Mr. Peters, that you are prepared to bet the farm on it. You were personally named in the lawsuit. Now, I am not even remotely qualified to be a lawyer, and you should certainly ask one about this, but that strikes me as a very bad thing! As in, Paramount and CBS will own your actual ass if they win, not just some shell company! Unlike PoopPropworx, which appears to be an incident of corporate bankruptcy, you could very well end up in personal bankruptcy!

As this missive is being posted publicly, I'm sure someone with actual legal credentials will eventually correct me there if I'm mistaken.

To summarize, your statements give the immediate impression that your case cannot stand on its own, and thus requires a completely inept vocal defense by yourself to give the illusion of merit. You do not address the actual concern -- on what grounds you expect to beat the IP owner -- so you give us nothing to judge your position by. Instead, you shit on attack anyone else who holds an opinion and dares to speak it.

This makes you look like a disturbingly desperate man.

If I might suggest, again as a concerned former fan, you might want to try simply ignoring your critics. Right or wrong, this will make you appear to be far more professional, and (for better or worse) far more likely to be in the right. It goes to the old adage: they're looking for a response, so you're only giving them what they–

No, you know what? To hell with it. Peters, SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY! YOU'RE NOT HELPING ANYTHING!

Yours truly,
Ion.

cc: everyone you hate over at TrekBBS.

PS: You have three business days remaining until your deadline for reply, and you've not yet so much as selected a fuckin' lawyer?! Are you fuckin' mad?!

PPS: Gawd am I glad I never gave you any money. You're clearly not qualified to manage it.
 
^
Of course, the editor that supports it is... decidedly iffy. It sometimes displays the wrong URLs for emoticons, resulting in smiley links that look like Peters will when CBS gets through with him.

:sigh:
 
^
Of course, the editor that supports it is... decidedly iffy. It sometimes displays the wrong URLs for emoticons, resulting in smiley links that look like Peters will when CBS gets through with him.

:sigh:
I expect those wrinkles will be ironed out soon. AntonyF is hard at work getting things in proper order. I suspect by the end of the month most moderate to major issues will be resolved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ion
I expect those wrinkles will be ironed out soon. AntonyF is hard at work getting things in proper order. I suspect by the end of the month most moderate to major issues will be resolved.

S'why I've not been bugging anyone about it. I figure he's probably swamped as it is. Speaking as someone who has professionally migrated many large systems, that went damn smooth. :)
 
S'why I've not been bugging anyone about it. I figure he's probably swamped as it is. Speaking as someone who has professionally migrated many large systems, that went damn smooth. :)
As someone who helped migrate a large board from vBulletin to Xenforo, I agree completely with your analysis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ion
Yeah, the message editor definitely has some bugs. Sometimes instead of working the tags just appear in the messages, and other times they work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ion
Saying you have a firm agreeing to represent you could mean they said sure if you want to throw your money away, we will represent your for 1000$/hour. But the statement *suggests* that Axanar has a firm which reasonably could be engaged. I have never really understood how people think that its not obvious when one has to crowbar-parse a statement to get at any concrete information. The silence of the recipients is just their weighing of whether to call you out now, or wait a bit and call you out later. Its is not a sign they have been fooled.
 
It really is too bad I'm not in Cali anymore, and that I don't have anywhere near enough legal background to pass the bar. I usually feel like I dodged a bullet not going into that profession; I would get bored far too easily, and I'd forever be missing court appearances. That way lay much badness. But for Axanar?

I think I might have enjoyed soaking them for thousands on a hopeless cause...
 
Pro- writer of several Trek publications, Stephen H Wilson, blogs about fans and copyright and the current situation here:

http://www.stevenhwilson.com/do-star-trek-fans-just-not-understand-copyright/

Many sensible points.

David Gerrold's reply on his Facebook page is somewhat naive, I think. He starts off by saying that Wilson's take on the situation is accurate, and then follows that with a ginormous "But..." And after a discussion of a "public relations disaster" that would ensue if CBS shuts down Axanar, he write, "in the best of all possible resolutions -- they have to come to some kind of accommodation with fan films."

No, they don't. CBS doesn't need a "win-win for everybody." CBS doesn't have to look out for anyone but themselves. CBS doesn't have to be benevolent to the fan community. Would Gerrold be as accommodating as he wants CBS to be if someone made a Chtorr or Star Wolf fan film? I harbor serious doubts, especially given that he's been trying to interest anyone in a Star Wolf television series for years.

He's worked in Hollywood for a long, long time. He knows how the studios work. His viewpoint, which he argues well, seems strangely doey eyed and naive to me.
 
Dear Mr. Peters,

cc: everyone you hate over at TrekBBS.

PS: You have three business days remaining until your deadline for reply, and you've not yet so much as selected a fuckin' lawyer?! Are you fuckin' mad?!

PPS: Gawd am I glad I never gave you any money. You're clearly not qualified to manage it.

OK, I have a problem now. I was allowed to say Thank You on this missive only one time. I'm not a lawyer, but it would probably be against the rules to create some sock puppets to Thank you some more. I've never had a sock puppet but consider your post liked massively.
 
^
Haven't updated to blu-ray for the movies yet. Is it on the DVDs? :)


Sadly, no. Most of the features like extras have migrated from DVD to Blu-Ray, which means that you have to buy the Blu-Ray/DVD combo pack of a movie or the Blu-Ray to get them.

However, Blu-Ray players have come down in price a lot, as have Blu-Ray discs.

i find the allegations of Dominic disturbing
:wtf::eek: What. The. Fuck. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
David Gerrold's reply on his Facebook page is somewhat naive, I think.
He apparently thinks so, too. I get a "you can't access this link" message.

No, they don't. CBS doesn't need a "win-win for everybody." CBS doesn't have to look out for anyone but themselves. CBS doesn't have to be benevolent to the fan community.
From your description, it sounds like he's trying to imply that the courts will (for some strange reason) force it. I can't imagine that would happen. The best case scenario (for Axanar), as far as I can tell, is that they get their asses stomped, but don't get personally bankrupted by the time it's over. And maybe the donors get (some of) their money back.

Yeah, I don't think so either.

He's worked in Hollywood for a long, long time. He knows how the studios work. His viewpoint, which he argues well, seems strangely doey eyed and naive to me.
To close to the problem, maybe? Drinking the Kool-Aid?

Really, it has to be the latter. I can't see any industry pro throwing so much weight behind Axanar unless they have a deeply personal investment in it. There's just too much to lose. Or maybe he considers himself retired, and this is a good way to get a bit of fame while trying to do something historic on the way out?

Dunno. Personally, I'd rather my swan song didn't have me going down in flames... :devil:
 
Gerrold hasn't done anything in televison or film that wasn't a fan film since 1999. He's woefully out of touch with the way the business operates today.

Based on his IMDB, it looks like he's occasionaly picked up work as a voice actor during the past fifteen years, but outside of The Martian Child (2007), which was based on his novelette (he didn't write the screenplay), there sure aren't any writing credits.

The merits of the case notwithstanding, it probably didn't help that he sued Paramount Pictures and Gene Roddenberry for "created by" credit on Star Trek: The Next Generation. Hollywood doesn't have a short memory about these things (a lesson Alec Peters will soon learn, no doubt). Since that case was settled, it's pretty telling that the only professional screenwriting credits Gerrold has earned since were a few freelance gigs offered by two of his friends (J. Michael Straczynski and Marc Scott Zicree).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top