• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A Solar Black Hole

1. Intense gravity that does not allow or create orbital transits around the Sun but would in fact pull everything to the Sun based on the objects mass. Objects with larger mass might possibly be able to enter into an orbital transit around such a Sun but would have to be extremely enormous in size.
That wouldn't make it a black hole. Just a very massive star.

2. An object passing across the Event Horizon of a Sun that due to its smaller mass the object would not be able to escape the gravitational influence of the Sun regardless of how much thrust the object created against the gravitational pull.
A sun cannot and does not have an event horizon unless all of its mass has collapsed into a singularity. An object can cross into an orbit too close or at too low of a velocity to escape, but that again does not make the star a black hole.

3. Black Holes and Stars do occupy each other at the some moment.
No they don't.

Why do you keep repeating this even though it's wrong?

If a sun therefore does not emit enough energy to keep from collapsing but does not collapse....
Then it is, by definition, not a black hole.

It takes light millions of years to leave the Sun and is not an instant process.
That's because the density of the sun's inner layers is insanely high; light travels much slower in a medium than it does in a vacuum. There are places in the sun's upper core here SOUND actually travels faster than light.

You are attempting to describe a core collapse deep within a star that forms a singularity before the rest of the star shows any signs of its formation. There are alot of very basic problems with this theory, not least of which is the fact that the OUTER layers of the star have no gravitational effects on the core and therefore the collapse can only be caused by the pressure of the outer layers from nuclear reactions. This is part of the reason black holes are only believed to form from extremely energetic supernova detonations: nothing else in the universe actually produces enough pressure to collapse a stellar core to that density.
 
A black hole isn't really black, of course. It does emit Hawking radiation. Its effective temperature is inversely proportional to its mass and the power radiated is inversely proportional to its mass squared. The power radiated by a black hole of 10 solar masses is only 10^-30 W, so it is effectively zero. Its temperature is 10^-8 K, which is less than that of the CMB (2.7 K). It cannot lose mass by Hawking radiation until the CMB temperature becomes lower than its temperature as the Universe expands. In the current epoch, for a black hole to evaporate, its mass must be approximately 0.8% that of the Earth, which is less than the Moon's mass.

http://www.einstein-online.info/elementary/quantum/evaporating_bh
 
A black hole isn't really black, of course. It does emit Hawking radiation. Its effective temperature is inversely proportional to its mass and the power radiated is inversely proportional to its mass squared. The power radiated by a black hole of 10 solar masses is only 10^-30 W, so it is effectively zero. Its temperature is 10^-8 K, which is less than that of the CMB (2.7 K). It cannot lose mass by Hawking radiation until the CMB temperature becomes lower than its temperature as the Universe expands. In the current epoch, for a black hole to evaporate, its mass must be approximately 0.8% that of the Earth, which is less than the Moon's mass.

http://www.einstein-online.info/elementary/quantum/evaporating_bh

Stephen Hawking said it, so it must be true.:vulcan:
 
UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.

UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?
 
UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.

UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?

Basically I am trying to make a comparison that a black hole and a sun are the same because some suns do in fact become black holes. If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.
 
Try harder. That comparison does not work. By your logic, living people and dead people are the same because living people eventually die.
 
UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.

UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?

Basically I am trying to make a comparison that a black hole and a sun are the same because some suns do in fact become black holes. If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.

The use of the word "become" in this post counters the title of your thread.
 
Personally, I think that coal and diamonds are the same because coal has the potential to become a diamond. And a block of marble is the same as the sculpture "David". And being a Presidential candidate is the same as being the President.

I recommend we slip over and put a gallon of crude oil in the OP's car. It's the same as refined gasoline, after all. Potentially.
 
UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.

UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?

Basically I am trying to make a comparison that a black hole and a sun are the same because some suns do in fact become black holes. If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.
No, a black hole and a sun are not the same. It does not matter how frequently you say that, it is not so.

If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.

This sentence alone shows you do not have a lot of understanding of how to write. It is virtually nonsensical and is the sort of gibberish you repeatedly post and thereby bring down the contemptuous responses you receive.

If a sun never became a black hole, it is solely because it never had the mass to become one to begin with.
 
If a sun never became a black hole, it is solely because it never had the mass to become one to begin with.
I don't know about that. It's conceivable that a massive enough star could be cannibalized by a companion black hole to the point that it no longer has enough mass to become a black hole itself.

---------------
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top