If it's not a black hole sun, what is it doing coming and washing away the rain?
That wouldn't make it a black hole. Just a very massive star.1. Intense gravity that does not allow or create orbital transits around the Sun but would in fact pull everything to the Sun based on the objects mass. Objects with larger mass might possibly be able to enter into an orbital transit around such a Sun but would have to be extremely enormous in size.
A sun cannot and does not have an event horizon unless all of its mass has collapsed into a singularity. An object can cross into an orbit too close or at too low of a velocity to escape, but that again does not make the star a black hole.2. An object passing across the Event Horizon of a Sun that due to its smaller mass the object would not be able to escape the gravitational influence of the Sun regardless of how much thrust the object created against the gravitational pull.
No they don't.3. Black Holes and Stars do occupy each other at the some moment.
Then it is, by definition, not a black hole.If a sun therefore does not emit enough energy to keep from collapsing but does not collapse....
That's because the density of the sun's inner layers is insanely high; light travels much slower in a medium than it does in a vacuum. There are places in the sun's upper core here SOUND actually travels faster than light.It takes light millions of years to leave the Sun and is not an instant process.
Anyway, here is a link that addresses your question head on and explains precisely why UY Scuti is not a black hold. Spoiler: it is not about semantics!
https://www.quora.com/Star-UY-Scuti...black-hole-how-come-light-can-escape-the-star
A black hole isn't really black, of course. It does emit Hawking radiation. Its effective temperature is inversely proportional to its mass and the power radiated is inversely proportional to its mass squared. The power radiated by a black hole of 10 solar masses is only 10^-30 W, so it is effectively zero. Its temperature is 10^-8 K, which is less than that of the CMB (2.7 K). It cannot lose mass by Hawking radiation until the CMB temperature becomes lower than its temperature as the Universe expands. In the current epoch, for a black hole to evaporate, its mass must be approximately 0.8% that of the Earth, which is less than the Moon's mass.
http://www.einstein-online.info/elementary/quantum/evaporating_bh
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.
UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
Jesus wept, the false meme is spreading.
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.
UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
Try harder. That comparison does not work. By your logic, living people and dead people are the same because living people eventually die.
I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.
UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
Basically I am trying to make a comparison that a black hole and a sun are the same because some suns do in fact become black holes. If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.
No, a black hole and a sun are not the same. It does not matter how frequently you say that, it is not so.I don`t really understand. It means that the mass of Scutti is so large that it draws all the nearest objects? As I also now that the red giant and according to it`s definition it expands as the burning inside of it is not so strong as it was earlier. So then it will become as black hole?UY Scuti the first Sun powerful enough to consume everything in its gravitational field.
UY Scuti the first Solar Black Hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlUUxWM0-c
Basically I am trying to make a comparison that a black hole and a sun are the same because some suns do in fact become black holes. If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.
If a sun never became a black hole then it would never have the potential to become one and would therefore never become a black hole.
I don't know about that. It's conceivable that a massive enough star could be cannibalized by a companion black hole to the point that it no longer has enough mass to become a black hole itself.If a sun never became a black hole, it is solely because it never had the mass to become one to begin with.
Jesus wept, the false meme is spreading.
Preaching I see. Looking for a free meal out of life?
If you read the article you'll realize what they are talking about is not remotely like what you suggested.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.