Trek's formula has been changed several times. Besides, you can't keep doing something that you've done for 50 years even after it stopped working 20 years ago. That would make you insane.
Trek Returning to TV in 2017!
- Thread starter Squiggy
- Start date
Trek's formula has been changed several times. Besides, you can't keep doing something that you've done for 50 years even after it stopped working 20 years ago. That would make you insane.
That's not how forums work.
But it would make you a pretty good Presidential candidate.
Then bring Captains Sulu and Worf out, look directly into the camera, and phaser them both in the heads.
The first scene should be an Alternative-Spock on a grassy knoll shooting and killing a young Prime Universe James T Kirk.
I want a cameo from Detective John Munch or I'm boycotting this overrated train wreck.
Put it at the beginning of the 24th century. Have them already using slipstream drives, sentient androids in Starfleet, overran the Klingon Empire, monstrously large starships and so on.
Yet all the while, having them say it takes place in the Prime universe.
Yet all the while, having them say it takes place in the Prime universe.
Followed by blowing up the Excelsior and the... um... Worfaprise?
And a brewery as engineering.
And transwarp beaming. I mean, you gotta have transwarp beaming.
Star Trek started stomping over its own cannon in the 70's and has been doing so ever since.
It's a good thing I'm not running the show. I'd be the biggest dick in the universe while putting on the best Star Trek people ever saw.
You sound like an old friend of mine. He used to say back when Enterprise was airing that he would just intentionally mess up continuity to get nerds' undies in a twist. At the time, even that thought to me seemed like heresy.
I'm pretty sure the show will be respectfully handled, and like King Daniel says, there will be broad strokes continuity. Even if they set it in the Abrams verse, they might ignore transwarp beaming. We have to face it right now, there are things that they are going to ignore. I'm OK with that.
It's a good thing I'm not running the show. I'd be the biggest dick in the universe while putting on the best Star Trek people ever saw.
You sound like an old friend of mine. He used to say back when Enterprise was airing that he would just intentionally mess up continuity to get nerds' undies in a twist. At the time, even that thought to me seemed like heresy.
I'm pretty sure the show will be respectfully handled, and like King Daniel says, there will be broad strokes continuity. Even if they set it in the Abrams verse, they might ignore transwarp beaming. We have to face it right now, there are things that they are going to ignore. I'm OK with that.
Sorry my memory of some of that canon stuff is a little off. I blame the radiation I was expose to from the nuclear war known as WW3 back in the 90s
You, sir, are my hero.
In the 1970s we got one and a half seasons of animated Trek, and then finally The Motion Picture. How did those stomp on anything?
Kor
It's a good thing I'm not running the show. I'd be the biggest dick in the universe while putting on the best Star Trek people ever saw.
You sound like an old friend of mine. He used to say back when Enterprise was airing that he would just intentionally mess up continuity to get nerds' undies in a twist. At the time, even that thought to me seemed like heresy.
I'm pretty sure the show will be respectfully handled, and like King Daniel says, there will be broad strokes continuity. Even if they set it in the Abrams verse, they might ignore transwarp beaming. We have to face it right now, there are things that they are going to ignore. I'm OK with that.
Sorry my memory of some of that canon stuff is a little off. I blame the radiation I was expose to from the nuclear war known as WW3 back in the 90s
Don't be silly. The Eugenics Wars were in the 90s. WW3 should be coming along any day now, along with the first manned mission to Saturn and homeless camps in all major American cities . . .
It's a good thing I'm not running the show. I'd be the biggest dick in the universe while putting on the best Star Trek people ever saw.
You sound like an old friend of mine. He used to say back when Enterprise was airing that he would just intentionally mess up continuity to get nerds' undies in a twist. At the time, even that thought to me seemed like heresy.
I'm pretty sure the show will be respectfully handled, and like King Daniel says, there will be broad strokes continuity. Even if they set it in the Abrams verse, they might ignore transwarp beaming. We have to face it right now, there are things that they are going to ignore. I'm OK with that.
Sorry my memory of some of that canon stuff is a little off. I blame the radiation I was expose to from the nuclear war known as WW3 back in the 90s
I just want to know why I wasn't selected to be a gentically engineered superman. I mean, sure I would have to turn my back on my family, but the benefits of having my own rocket to flee Earth when things go bad is too good to pass up.
I think we all miss this guy and his superior knowledge.
I have always wondered how a TOS/Columbo Cross Over would have worked out.
But I'm pretty sure we'll see the "officer under suspicion of murder" episode. I also want "artificial intelligence fights for its rights" Episode, the "Transporter splits/joins people" episode and the "this planet's water turns you into a sex-maniac" episode.
Mine too.
Similar threads
