• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Trek Returning to TV in 2017!

Well, there goes the thought that CBS is simply happy to sit on the profit pile with nothing new of its own.

And I guessing that Paramount won't be launching Michael Gummelt's Star Trek Uncharted...

:bolian:

Looks like they saw an opportunity and took it... I am Beyond excited. This is awesome!
 
What about non US fans? how are we getting it. I always hoped Netflix would do a Trek show
 
^
Netflix would have been the preferable service to use for a new show.

Captain Worf will probably happen at some point, even if Michael has to find a way for the Star Trek Continues writers to put him into a script using time travel or he gets on an episode of Renegades. Nobody said Captain Worf had to be an "official" appearance. ;)
 
Why are people getting hung up on this streaming thing when the article implies it will be on TV too?
 
I'm kind of enh about it. I hope the show will return to more of a Star Trek feel; the movies have been more of a Star Wars feel in my opinion.

The streaming bit bothers me too. I get the big push for streaming from people who have access, but large parts of the U.S. still have crap internet access. The AT&T guy fixing my land line just told me that the equipment enabling him to have internet in his neighborhood was condemned, and AT&T is not replacing it. All of those people were just effectively cut off from the net unless they use their spotty cell phone signal or an overpriced satellite service.
 
I'm torn on the fact that it's not related to the new films, they've gone to all this trouble to make all the new concepts that it seems a shame to not utilize them, but it will also be good to get back to the Prime universe. I'm hoping for another 100 year jump past the TNG era for new stories.

I haven't seen anything stating they are going back to the Prime universe?

The official notice has this comment:
The new television series is not related to the upcoming feature film Star Trek Beyond which is scheduled to be distributed by Paramount Pictures in summer 2016.

I seriously doubt they would make a *third* universe for this new series.

I could see them doing what they did to relaunch Doctor Who back in 2005, a "soft reboot" of sorts, where they just started telling stories with only vague allusions to the previous TV series, until they they had solidified their story telling and then brought the old and new together.





Announcement:
http://www.startrek.com/article/new-star-trek-series-premieres-january-2017
 
It will be on TV elsewhere - as of now streaming only in the US.

I kinda hope that the plans change and it eventually airs on a channel over here. Some fans probably aren't too keen on the idea of paying for a streaming service they don't already have and didn't want because it offers nothing else of value.
 
Well, there goes the thought that CBS is simply happy to sit on the profit pile with nothing new of its own.

Yes. There were all too many people here who made pronouncements that Trek wouldn't come back to TV. It couldn't work. Too expensive, etc...

I knew with a franchise like this that it was only a matter of time. However, I too am disappointed that they chickened out and just brought in a nuTrek guy to work on this.

Even with better writing, I don't like the nuTrek "look". The lens-flare, Applestore bridges with a "window" viewscreen, brewery engine-room, phasers that shoot like blasters, shaky-cam, and the crappy ship designs. It would have been better to schedule a continuity reboot or go back to prime continuity in order to get out of the prison of that aesthetic.
 
Kurtzman out.

Manny Coto and Ron Moore in.

Then I might watch it. Get Frakes on board as director as well.

I'm struggling to see where all these new stories are going to come from. The well ran dry after about season 2 of Voyager. My money's on it just being a rehash of what has already gone before. Next to no one will watch it, mainly due to access issues, and it will be canned after the first season.

I'd rather watch Axanar which I've not got around to seeing yet.
 
Old time fan here. First off, I enjoyed ST09, but didn't care for STID precisely because I though it was too derivative. If I want to watch "Wrath of Khan", I already have the DVD, thank you.

Also as a student of politics I can tell you that the way to expand your base is not by alienating your preexisting supporters, but rather by keeping them and adding new people by targeting portions of your "product" to their interests.

Admittedly, a taller job, but I certainly think it can be done.
Thank you. At least someone with brains sees it, instead of this keen jerk assumption that older fans are scum who must be wrong in the head and cast aside.
 
A clean reboot is possible, whiners. But then they couldn't share costs with the movie franchise, which is a long Trek tradition.

And there would be whining anyway.
 
It's produced by the guy who wrote produced the 2009 movie and Into Darkness. It's going to totally be related.
Then I'm not watching.

On the Star Trek OS press release it says they are returning to the storytelling of old. Social themes, etc. Well, I can't say how much faith I have in that with a clown like Kurtzman on board. THis guy doesn't know Star Trek or understand the fans at all. He only understands a section of them, and the division in fandom caused by the reboot, especially Into Darkness, is a testament to that.

That's very well put.

I know that people can't kill themselves stressing over how to make a new movie or show.... but couldn't Abrams, Kurtzman and Orci have navigated the currents a little better than to utterly divide the fanbase?

I'm sure Trek could have been popular AND faithful.

Just look at how this has been done with so many other properties. Did anyone truly expect that a film as nerdy as "The Martian" would ever be made, or that the "Lord of the Rings" would ever be so faithfully adapted, or that an unrepentant space western like "Guardians of the Galaxy" would break the box office, or that "The Avengers" would be so true to Marvel? Did they really have to butcher the characters as much as they did, with unprofessional arguments on the bridge, hyperactive pacing, etc? Surely both could have been satisfied, and Trek could have been done at a dignified pace like say "Interstellar"?
 
The streaming bit bothers me too. I get the big push for streaming from people who have access, but large parts of the U.S. still have crap internet access.

Large parts, but not many people live in those large parts.

When you include mobile broadband, the US is over 80% penetration.

Heh.
 
This news has certainly brightened up a dreary Monday for me! Let's boldly go on television (or at least a streaming service) once again!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top