• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble film?

Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

@Malaika, I'm far more interested in your Compare & Contrast post, once you've seen the movie, between how you thought it would go and how it actually did, than reading this continued speculative debate about it. Waste of time in a vacuum.

FYI - I'm skimming this thread for a change of tack until the subject becomes relevant, or just different.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Uhura has done more in these two movies than she did in the entire run of TOS, so I'm not sure what the complaining is about that she isn't doing enough.

Agreed she has done more but it would be nice to see a little more to her job imo. Regardless I will be seeing the next movie anyway(Yep I actually have gone to the theater for all the Abrams ones. I do enjoy these films to some extent even though some may not think so.;)) and it will be interesting to see what Pegg does with her character and her interactions with Kirk, Spock and hopefully McCoy. The biggest thing that it seems Pegg is going to do is have the crew meet something totally different and I think that will bring the characters in new directions that the previous films didn't.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Uhura has done more in these two movies than she did in the entire run of TOS, so I'm not sure what the complaining is about that she isn't doing enough.

Agreed she has done more but it would be nice to see a little more to her job imo.

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Uhura has done more in these two movies than she did in the entire run of TOS, so I'm not sure what the complaining is about that she isn't doing enough.

Agreed she has done more but it would be nice to see a little more to her job imo.

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.

True. I had forgotten that part.:) The only time in I remember the original Uhura trying to do something like that was to talk to the Klingons without using the universal translator in ST:TUDC. She was pretty bad at it. I would guess the NuUhura would have not had a problem.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Nichelle Nichols herself hated that scene where Uhura used the dictionary, it made no sense to her. Orci is a trek fan, maybe the fact that new Uhura called her klingon 'rusty' and yet she's fluent with it (wasn't the message she intercepted and translated in the first movie in klingon too?) was a 'take that' for that scene with tos Uhura. (to a lesser extent even Spock's birth scene - that was cut - might be a little 'fix' of Sybok's version of his birth) Either way, I'm glad they corrected that aspect.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Nichelle Nichols herself hated that scene where Uhura used the dictionary, it made no sense to her. Orci is a trek fan, maybe the fact that new Uhura called her klingon 'rusty' and yet she's fluent with it (wasn't the message she intercepted and translated in the first movie in klingon too?) was a 'take that' for that scene with tos Uhura. (to a lesser extent even Spock's birth scene - that was cut - might be a little 'fix' of Sybok's version of his birth) Either way, I'm glad they corrected that aspect.

I think the message she intercepted was Rommalan....Womuwan.....Wommuan!

Wha? I hab nubtug?!



:)

No, I think you're right. Message : Klingon. (Ship...Wommuan). :D
 
Last edited:
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.
She's nuTrek's Hoshi Sato with a thing for the Vulcan first officer, which might have been really quite more interesting in Enterprise.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.
She's nuTrek's Hoshi Sato with a thing for the Vulcan first officer, which might have been really quite more interesting in Enterprise.

Too predictable.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.
She's nuTrek's Hoshi Sato with a thing for the Vulcan first officer, which might have been really quite more interesting in Enterprise.

And still, nuUhura has done more than both TOS Uhura and Hoshi Sato combined, so still not seeing an issue here.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.
She's nuTrek's Hoshi Sato with a thing for the Vulcan first officer, which might have been really quite more interesting in Enterprise.

15209230785_7c40ef685a_o.png
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Yes.

That said, the original Star Trek was not an ensemble. It was about Kirk and Spock.
I believe it was the Trinity of Kirk, Spock & McCoy that was so dynamic about Star Trek. Hopefully, they will bring that back in the next film. :techman:
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Her job now is quite a bit more sophisticated than being the boat's radio operator as it was in TOS. Her facility with alien languages is a big part of it, and was central to her participation in STID.
She's nuTrek's Hoshi Sato with a thing for the Vulcan first officer, which might have been really quite more interesting in Enterprise.

15209230785_7c40ef685a_o.png
Well, Hoshi and T'Pol work pretty well together in my vivid imagination. Sorry you can't see it that way.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

A thread elsewhere on the topic of McCoy's insulting of Spock has me wondering if that aspect will be played up in the new movie. It hasn't really been seen in NuTrek so far, but after they've known each other a few years they might settle into a combative rapport.


In some of his past and present interviews about all the movies where he's in or that he had written he's constantly stressing the fact that the male characters are IT for him
If you are unable to verify this assertion, there's no reason we should believe it's true.
I dunno if it even computes to you that I'm only sharing my opinion
If you say "he's constantly stressing the fact that the male characters are IT for him", that is not an opinion, it is an assertion of fact.

you are the one saying that what I stated is untrue (yet posted no quote from him to support you thesis)
I don't have to support any thesis; it is you making assertions, so it's up to you to prove them.

That said, here's some examples:
“Traditionally, there’s a triumvirate at the center of Star Trek, and it’s Spock, Kirk and Bones​
That's not any kind of pro-male, anti-female statement. It's a description of TOS which any sane fan would agree with.

That bond is just so lovely, it’s kind of more interesting than any sort of romance in the entire story… And Zach and Chris play that so well, you know. They’re great friends in real life, and to play that sort of… almost like romantic tension, they have great fun with it.”​
He said a similar thing about his roles too, he keeps saying that the real bonds are the male friendships only
No, what he's saying here is that in the NuTrek movies the Kirk/Spock relationship is more interesting than the Spock/Uhura relationship. That might be debatable, in the case of STID anyway, but Kirk/Spock has certainly gotten more play on-screen in NuTrek, without any help from Simon "I hate women apparently" Pegg.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

I guess I found the Simon Pegg fans....


"which any sane fan would agree with."

here we go again... :rolleyes: next time say 'real fans' too and you complete it.

And then I'm the one expressing their opinions as if they were facts :rolleyes:

It seems to me some here want to somehow dny the evidence of his own comments and pretend that there is no reason someone should be unsure about him when it comes to some aspects and thus keep their expectations accordingly.
Like, he keeps saying the male characters are IT for him and he even put down the dynamics with the female character (e.g., Uhura) in an apples vs oranges unnecessary comparision to praise the dynamic between the dudes. He also admitted he can't write good female characters and he wrote out female characters from his movies because he wasn't able to make them as important as the male characters were (hence him constantly saying that the real romances are the platonic friendships between male characters. There seems to be a funny pattern in his interviews in that he seems to keep attributing to the guys female roles and the kind of dynamics that in his movies are given to women hence the whole 'guys have a romantic tension', Mccoy is Kirk's 'other woman' etc..at the same time he dissmisses the actual 'romances' with women).
I guess I have to blindly trust him and have absolutely no doubt that he will write Uhura, S/U and new female characters better than JJ&co. Like, why should I even be unsure about Pegg even caring? Noooope. No reason, at all.

I guess, also, it's just a coincidence that at the end of stid there were two female characters to balance the prominence of male characters a bit but now it seems that the secondary female character (whose possible connection with the existing characters was hinted for future movies) was written out by the current creative team.
Of course, there is Boutella's character (who according to rumors might play an alien) I guess there can be only two female characters for movie.

I love that apparently I'm the one trying to convert others to my 'creed' (lol) yet, others trying to 'convince' me that my feelings are wrong, and them being forceful with their opinions dragging me into an endless argument obessing over whatever I honestly think that not trusting Pegg too much when it comes to certain aspects and not have big expectations is the realistic thing to do for me, is totally fine and not over the top or an useless argument here.


That bond is just so lovely, it’s kind of more interesting than any sort of romance in the entire story… And Zach and Chris play that so well, you know. They’re great friends in real life, and to play that sort of… almost like romantic tension, they have great fun with it.”​
He said a similar thing about his roles too, he keeps saying that the real bonds are the male friendships only
No, what he's saying here is that in the NuTrek movies the Kirk/Spock relationship is more interesting than the Spock/Uhura relationship. That might be debatable, in the case of STID anyway, but Kirk/Spock has certainly gotten more play on-screen in NuTrek, without any help from Simon "I hate women apparently" Pegg.

His wasn't a generic statement about k/s having more screentime nor he was talking about tos.
He specifically put the dynamic between the guys as the one having more depth and being more interesting than Uhura's relationship and the other romances with women. (he said similar things about his male characters too) He didn't say it was more interesting than any other sort of friendship between the guys in the movies too, like kirk/bones - that I can argue gets as much screen time as the romance gets and in fact a lot of people prefer that dynamic over reboot k/s - or the interactions between his character and Kirk and Keenser, that in fact he seemed to overrate as deep relationships while promoting stid. It was a dig at, coincidence, ONLY the dynamics with women and, basically, the work Saldana had done with Quinto (both actors are proud of their own on screen dynamic and did their best making it interesting and convincing..which it is for many) tbh.
Why he felt he had to make it a petty competition between two completely different dynamics rather than, say, compare it to the other friendships (if petty comparisions were so needed for him) is a mystery for me. Or maybe not. (But I give up here).
Either way, it was unnecessary and it comes across as insecurity too as if he believes that the male friendships need to get compared to the romances with women to make a point about them being interesting. That's weird. I think romances and platonic friendships can co exist on their own merit.

Anyway, back to the point: Pegg can have opinions and I'm not against him having them. But since he unfortunately co-wrote this movie I really can't pretend that his opinions and stated preferences won't influence some things when, well, it's possible that they did. That's pretty simple and reasonable to me.

Had he said he thought Uhura and romance were more interesting than Mccoy and the original trinity, I have a feeling the Mccoy and trinity fans around here wouldn't hope his movie would be so great with those aspects.
I feel some people here had been negative in their expectations about these movies for much much less.


Eta: and I NEVER said he hates women. Let's not be too touchy on his behalf. That's ridiculizing the actual point here that apparently you don't get (even though one could say Pegg himself has explained it)
Let's not turn this board into trekmovie 2, just on reverse and thus the 'fans of all the writers and optimistic at any cost or GTFO/shut up' side because it's starting to feel like that.
 
Last edited:
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

If it makes you Pegg supporters feel better, I had similar opinions and doubts about Lindelof too. Though, with Lindelof one might be glad when their favorite characters and the female characters aren't his fav because, tbh, he writes his fav as s*it (guess the one from Lost...) at least with Pegg you can hope he will write his fav decently.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

I guess, also, it's just a coincidence that at the end of stid there were two female characters to balance the prominence of male characters a bit but now it seems that the secondary female character (whose possible connection with the existing characters was hinted for future movies) was written out by the current creative team.
Of course, there is Boutella's character (who according to rumors might play an alien) I guess there can be only two female characters for movie.

Is the quality of a movie now determined by the the gender of the characters? In a TOS-based movie you'll always have more cocks strutting around than hens.

Personlly, I'd love to see Morrison return as Mrs. Kirk (she must still be around in Starfleet somewhere), but I guess that's not going to happen.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

I guess, also, it's just a coincidence that at the end of stid there were two female characters to balance the prominence of male characters a bit but now it seems that the secondary female character (whose possible connection with the existing characters was hinted for future movies) was written out by the current creative team.
Of course, there is Boutella's character (who according to rumors might play an alien) I guess there can be only two female characters for movie.

Is the quality of a movie now determined by the the gender of the characters? In a TOS-based movie you'll always have more cocks strutting around than hens.

Personlly, I'd love to see Morrison return as Mrs. Kirk (she must still be around in Starfleet somewhere), but I guess that's not going to happen.

No, I don't think the quality of a movie is based on that, though having more representation for other genders beside the male one and more representation for other minorities such as poc and queer people doesn't hurt for sure and some might argue that it does something for the quality of the movie overall too. In the time where we are I honestly believe that keeping trek the way it was in tos isn't exactly a recipe for success, not for the audience of these movies. Movies that had already been criticized for the lack of female roles.
Alice Eve's role in particular got a lot of criticism from both fans and critics (..some too over the top for me, like those pretending she truly was just the girl in underwear) and many expected or hoped the writers would improve the character in the next movie. I'm indifferent about her one way or another but the actress herself seemed to be sure she'd be back for trek 3 which makes me think that maybe the previous creative team made her think that. After all, the comic writer himself had done his best trying to include her in the comics thinking she's part of the crew now.

Nevertheless, the context and point of the current discussion is whatever Pegg is biased and partial about the male characters or not and if there are or not clues that he can do a good job with the female characters. For me, beyond his pro feminism moment, the female characters are not his interest and he's not able to see them as interesting regardless how they are written and by who because he seems to have a default disposition to automatically see the male characters as more interesting. The fact that Alice Eve and thus Carol doesn't seem to come back for trek 3 just adds to this overall idea I have of him. Perhaps, because he wasn't inspired to make her Kirk's love interest he wrote the character out the way he did in the past with others. With Uhura he's more 'stuck' as her character is one of the main ones and her dynamic with Spock was created by someonelse so he'd have to deal with it one way or another. The way he would is up to debate but, and I hope I'm wrong, I have a feeling that if it were for him alone Uhura and her dynamics would get treated as an afterthought compared to the dynamics between the male characters. I have little hope he'd be able to write scenes like the turbolift one or Spock's speech from the shuttle scene from stid.

Of course that's my opinion. I'm sure that for Uhura haters as well as those 'I want the original trinity back!' people it's the opposite and if I'm right they'll basically get the movie they are demanding since 2009 ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Personally, I think Pegg just acknowledged a weakness and his preference for writing characters. Since he has a cowriter, and Justin Lin with the final say in characters and dialog. If Pegg has a struggle, he has resources to draw upon to improve and support him.

At least, I am optimistic about it, because I have really enjoyed Spock and Uhura's relationship, and am hoping that Eve comes back, and if not her, that there is a female role to provide a different voice.
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Personally, I think Pegg just acknowledged a weakness and his preference for writing characters. Since he has a cowriter, and Justin Lin with the final say in characters and dialog. If Pegg has a struggle, he has resources to draw upon to improve and support him.

I'd much rather have a writer who recognizes and acknowledges their own shortcomings, and then takes the proper steps to fix them before the final product.

Hollywood is just chock-full of people who are too quick to say, "My work doesn't suck, YOU suck." (Uwe Boll, I'm looking at you)
 
Re: Will Star Trek 3 be a Kirk & Spock centric film or An Ensemble fil

Personally, I think Pegg just acknowledged a weakness and his preference for writing characters. Since he has a cowriter, and Justin Lin with the final say in characters and dialog. If Pegg has a struggle, he has resources to draw upon to improve and support him.

I'd much rather have a writer who recognizes and acknowledges their own shortcomings, and then takes the proper steps to fix them before the final product.

This.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top