Any thought's on Ruddock's sacking? It seemed a bit out of the blue and is a bad look. Did Ruddock organise the coup that Andrew Robb hinted at?
Aussie politics is very interesting at the moment.
Sure is. Never a dull moment. But
jazamul is right, it's not the main game. It's a distraction from the real issue : the halving of iron ore and coal prices in the past year that has totally changed the game for this country. This graph shows just how much we rely on income from these two commodities.
Cut those top blue lines in half, and we have a very big problem. Hockey should be all over the press with charts like this, explaining that the Commonwealth's finances are the equivalent of someone maxing out a platinum credit card then waking up the next morning and learning he's just had half his pay cut!
One thing Hockey did get right, apparently, was counselling Abbott to bring the spill forward a day to Monday. It probably saved Abbott the humiliation of being voted out of the job even though there was no challenger.
Ruddock, as whip, is supposed to communicate with the backbench on behalf of the leader and above all know how spooked the horses are. Apparently he assured his boss he could count only 16-18 votes for the spill. As it turned out it was 39. A whip who can't count is a pretty dangerous thing, so, father of the house or not, he had to go.
Predictably the Ruddock sacking will be used by those who want Abbott gone to start building momentum against him. Just get it over with. There are ministers in more senior positions who need to be moved along -- the country has bigger problems to face.