Likewise, no other book has been so riddled with inaccuracy or by an author so unwilling to openly acknowledge his mistakes. Instead, he waits for his readers to point them out to him so he can fix them in time for the next revised edition, thereby editing the books for him after the fact. Self-publishing aside, these books are being produced by a scam artist taking advantage of fans like you.
As much as I hate to admit it, this is pretty spot on. All one has to do is look at the UESPA book fiasco.
The gift that keeps on giving.
"The UESPA book fiasco"
He didn't even fix the mistake. Instead he wrote a snarky caption that now questions everything in the books and highlights the type of person we're dealing with.
Neil
Neil, I have nothing but respect, gratitude, and awe at the work you have brought to TOS scholarship--certainly as opposed to all the other derivative crap that's out there.
But Cushman's work is not derivative. There IS primary research here. It's only when he has to pad it that it becomes a "load of peanut butter", as David Gerrold once said.
For those of us who, as much as we would like to, can't spend hours at UCLA, it's pretty good stuff. Taken, of course with a discerning eye.
Steve Whitfield's book was beautiful, but somewhat "burnished". Gerrold's "World" doesn't hold up very well. Justman/Solow was a sacred text...but had errors or lapses that were maddening.
Your score series was nearly perfect, but of course, nothing is, is it?
Cushman's stuff? Schloppy, yes, and yet, there are nuggets and hard truths uncovered that were heretofore hidden. Is he an honest man? Who cares? Was Gene?
Oh well, I just keep gobbling it up.