Same here.I'll eat my proverbial hat if it's a crossover, but if it is, then I've been gravely mistaken - nay, deceived - about the ethos of STC.
So far I've enjoyed each of the three productions even though if pressed I'd have to say "Lolani" is the episode (I feel) is most in keeping with TOS' approach to stories. While "Pilgrim Of Eternity" was a respectable followup I don't think it's a revisit TOS would have actually done. And "Fairest Of Them All," again while quite enjoyable, was a pure indulgence since it's highly unlikely TOS would have even considered doing something like it.
So while I'm appreciating STC I also feel they're walking a rather fine line that, so far, they haven't crossed yet. And, of course, I'm hoping they don't cross that line.
You may want to tell me to spack off for saying this but i think people can get too obsessed with 60s purism. That's why I like the other show, they are not afraid to acknowledge The Movies/TNG/Era.
The episodes are very good at capturing the feel of the 60s but there's nearly half a century of Star Trek following TOS. For continuity they should be acknowledged.
OK the movie/TNG era is my own so I would say that but fans can get very nitpicky. Maybe I say this because Continues, Exeter, Farragut, Ajax etc have all been based on the 60s show and I feel I like a change.
From someone who grew up with the original, and enjoys that type of storytelling, I personally hope that STC stays with its intended goal, to finish seasons 4 and 5 as authentically as possible. Although I enjoy TNG onward, the universe they created takes itself too seriously, and the movies became a parody of TOS (ST4)? A crossover would be a big departure from their stated goal, and I really hope they don't go there.

