If they could work out the licencing, I personally would love it if Mars in the Star Trek universe was Barsoom. With essentually the history and culture ERB wrote of.Add John Carter of Mars to the list.
If they could work out the licencing, I personally would love it if Mars in the Star Trek universe was Barsoom. With essentually the history and culture ERB wrote of.Add John Carter of Mars to the list.
How do you know that Alpha Centauri only had a population in the thousands? Hell, it could have grown in population until it was comparable with any of the other founding worlds. For that matter, it could have been settled by Humans, Vulcans, Andorians, AND Tellarites (maybe it was divided up into four parts like Vienna after WWII). We've got very little information to go on.Well it kind of does. Five homeworlds with populations in the billions, and one (former?) colony with a population in the thousands, form a federation with each having equal power, an equal vote in affairs?
Okay, let's do some math. Terra Nova was the first extra-solar colony sent out in 2069, so we know that alpha centauri was subseqent to that. The AC colony is no older than 95 years. The SS Conestoga carried about 200 people, and that ship was used one way and disassembled for building materais upon arrivial, and was said to have been low warp.How do you know that Alpha Centauri only had a population in the thousands?
A population increase into the billions in less than a century? No. There no way they could have produced/imported that kind of support inferstructure in less than a century.Hell, it could have grown in population until it was comparable with any of the other founding worlds.
Because, again, that's more of a title than introducing someone to someone else.I don't understand - how is this different from saying "Lawrence of Arabia"? That is, how would you say something like that in a "nondescriptive" manner? What would you do differently?
That's not true at all. They've used that style on several occasions, particularly in reference to Vulcans and Sarek especially (but I do recall it being used occasionally with other species, too). Here's an example just after a quick Google search, from the episode "The Ultimate Computer:"Amusingly, in Trek, nobody is identified with his place of origin - not Kahless, not Zora, not Li Quan.
Terra Nova was the first extra-solar colony sent out in 2069, so we know that alpha centauri was subseqent to that.
Now if AC had a indiguious civilization, comparible to the other federation founders, then a population in the billions would be possible, a indigious population plus a few thousand Humans.
Because, again, that's more of a title than introducing someone to someone else.
That's not true at all. They've used that style on several occasions, particularly in reference to Vulcans and Sarek especially (but I do recall it being used occasionally with other species, too).
Here's an example just after a quick Google search, from the episode "The Ultimate Computer:"
Captain James T. Kirk: But a genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. Did Einstein, Kazanga, or... or Sitar of Vulcan produce new and revolutionary theories on a regular schedule?
Considering you address it in your next quote below, you seem to be purposefully obtuse here. It's called "context." Kirk was clearly introducing Cochrane and identifying what world he was from. Hell, for all we know there were other famous Zephram Cochranes. Not that it matters, because the context was pretty clear. Aside from people purposely trying to ignore that so that their weak rationalization for the conflict of information makes sense in their heads, of course.I just don't get it. How do you say it differently so that it becomes (ceases to be) one thing or the other? What is the relevant word combination, the relevant inflection, the relevant nudge or wink?
Because "Lawrence of Arabia" is not a common parlance, and it wasn't being used in the same context at all. Like, not even a little. Especially since he's never labeled that way, like ever again. Unlike, you know, Lawrence of Arabia who's almost always addressed like that when he comes up. Kind of like in this thread...There's no context around "ZC of AC". There's just "ZC of AC". So something else than context must be separating it from "Lawrence of Arabia" in your mind. What is it?
Now your argument is that it's "redundant" to describe what world some prominent aliens are from? Really? That's what you're going with here? That they don't use it for every single person in the universe?Not for introducing Sarek of Vulcan, though. It's a somewhat redundant description applied later on in the game. One wonders if there's a danger of confusion there, with Sarek of Sweden, say.
I dunno, where is Bronq, Stendoric, or Xalamaroo from? What exactly is your point here?So where was Kazanga from?
Again, no, it's not limited to Vulcans. There's just plenty examples of it being used with Vulcans on the show. As opposed to it never being used in a Lawrence of Arabia sort of way as far as I can recall. Like, ever. The closest example I could come up with to Lawrence of Arabia (notice how the full title keeps being used for him, as opposed to Zephram Cochrane?) was "The Sisko is of Bajor," and that was the Prophets telling him that's where he's bound to, not so much a title or name for him.It seems only Vulcans are subject to this treatment...
Or was perfectly class M, but the locals didn't immediately open it to immigration from Earth. After some haggling over terms, a Human colony was permitted, and colonists began to arrive.Intriguingly, Terra Nova was essentially said to be the only Earth-like rock within 20 lightyears that could have been colonized. Alpha Centauri is of course within 20 ly, so the implication is that it's not Class M.
Would depend on how many people were in the first generation.A population explosion on a Class M planet, producing millions of settlers within a couple of generations, would appear inevitable
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.