• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

yar's epitaph speech, ridiculous in so many levels

number6;1705180Learn to take what you can dish out and maybe people will [I said:
want[/i] to have a conversation with you.

In that case, then I'm going to the original point and say that using the word 'gay' in a context to criticize isn't really a good way to go about it.
Only if you're predisposed to take offence. That's your choice and your reponse will be respected (or not) accordingly.
That scene was totally gay. I'm not sorry if you choose to be offended by. My choice of words. You can respect my opinion or not. I couldn't really care less, especially if you choose to be condescending because you disagree with my choice of words.

The use of "gay" as a general derogatory is juvenile. You can use whatever words you want, but don't be surprised at the kind of response you will get.
 
I don't think gay is the word I would have selected as my one word response for this part of the episode. I could go with goofy or corny maybe. I thought it was pretty good. I think the Picard-Data ending and Data standing on the hill reminded me of TOS on some level. It had that GR touch of classic Trek.
 
"Gay" is not an insult. The offense is simply in broadcasting one's own intolerance and limited perspective to the internet at large. As an insult, perhaps it is no longer generally accepted. After all, it marginalizes people, and who has the right, really, to do that.
 
Really, insult is always in the ear of the insulted, and thus the insulted party holds sovereign judgement over the issue.

It's just that basic politeness works differently over the internet. In the real world, it goes something like this:

A: "You are green."
B: "Please don't call me green, I find it insulting."
A: "I can call you green if I want. Don't be thin-skinned."
B: (kicks A in the groin, then twice in the head for a good measure)
C: "Wow, B, you are so polite! I would have used an axe!"

Over the net, the kicking part is so much more difficult, thus eliminating one of the most important expressions of good manners.

Timo Saloniemi
 
As a storytelling device and within the context of the universe itself, it makes perfect sense.

\S/

Agreed--the thing itself makes sense. As a Starfleet officer, and a security officer in particular, Tasha would have known there was a real possibility she might die in the line of duty. And the 24th century holotechnology made the means of delivering that farewell message as seen perfectly plausible.

But... on the other hand, watching it last night for the first time in years, I was struck by how awful it was. The writing was trite and Denise Crosby's delivery was just amazingly bad. The 'Hailing Frequencies Closed' ending was goofy as hell. I was cringing.

This is my only problem with the scene. It wasn't executed very well but it was an excellent way to emphasize the themes of the story. Like I said in the other thread, Yar's story in this episode juxtaposes against Armus'. He was able to kill her in a meaningless way yet her death is not a tragedy. She died fulfilling her role in life to be remembered by those who loved her while he remains cursed to live alone and forgotten.

I felt the same way after watching it for the first time. The memorial added a depth to her character and also helped make a subpar episode a little bit better. Sure, the speech has its flaws, but it still gets the job done, IMHO.

Gay. Really gay!!

Even if you didn't like it I didn't find it lively or merry. But, seriously, that statement offends me and I hate seeing ignorant comments like this on a ST forum.
 
Kindly get back on the actual topic everyone.

If you guys want to have an argument about the different current usages, cultural meanings and personal impact of using the word "gay", I'd suggest TNG isn't the best forum for that discussion and you should take it somewhere else.
 
What always strikes me about that episode is the general feeling that the character was let go just as she was developing. I recently watched all of S1 and it's just not true that Tasha Yar was developed that much less than the other bridge crew. There was a greater focus on Picard, Data, and Wesley, but Tasha had about as much to do as Worf, Geordi, or Troi.
That, and the general cheeziness of the oil slick monster. It seems very TOS, where you can see the monster having captured Uhura or McCoy, and even Tasha's death was like that of a red shirt. I wonder if "Skin of Evil" was a rewritten TOS episode, does anyone know?
 
Denise Crosby could make any speech awful.
That said, it was just a little corny she'd address just the folks who are 'before the credits' people. Why not throw in one unknown person into the service to show that she was close to at least one other person from the compliment of 1000.
 
Denise Crosby could make any speech awful.
That said, it was just a little corny she'd address just the folks who are 'before the credits' people. Why not throw in one unknown person into the service to show that she was close to at least one other person from the compliment of 1000.

Because it's Star Trek and anyone who doesn't get a speaking part on the Bridge is canonfodder ;) I agree though, it would've been a nice touch and one they somewhat remedied later on by showing light on Crusher's friendship with that nurse, as well as some spotlight time for the O'Briens
 
-talks about every-single-one that is supposed to be there.
Which is mainly the bridge crew where she worked all the time.

One word,

Wesley.

btw, my main issue with it is not such technicalities but the basic I mentioned: That a very young person is going through a process of making epitaph speeches; and what a person at that: a regular security officer with that character.
 
-talks about every-single-one that is supposed to be there.
Which is mainly the bridge crew where she worked all the time.

One word,

Wesley.

btw, my main issue with it is not such technicalities but the basic I mentioned: That a very young person is going through a process of making epitaph speeches; and what a person at that: a regular security officer with that character.


Again, I don't understand. There were a lot of scenes in season one where she was "guiding" Wesley. He would ask her a lot of questions about morality and so on.

Also if the technology allowed, a holodeck epitaph might be the equivalent of a letter home but more elaborate. SOmeone also mentioned that on DS9 other crewman were observed making similar "goodbye" speeches.

RAMA
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top