• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

X-Men FC: Only $56 Million estimated for opening weekend.

Both X:FC and Green Lantern were affected by this. They had uninteresting, unengaging, dragging boring stories. Its that simple.

Green Lantern yes.

First Class? VERY engaging. Sorry you disagree. I would definitely pay to see First Class again. And will most likely buy the DVD. It was the best X-man movie since X2, and my favorite action movie of the summer so far.
 
This week was there really only a 44% drop off and it stayed at Number 4? That is pretty good, isn't it. Proves people are still seeing this almost a month out. Not bad with no frigging marketing!
 
$317 million worldwide total at the moment and I don't know how much steam is left in the oversea markets I think $350ish is the likely totally so I would be surprised not to see a sequel though maybe at a tad cheaper rate.
 
Amazing how we are hoping there is a magic number for a First Class sequel but Green Lantern has had bad reviews, a 65% drop with only $100 mil plus and Warners is already shouting sequel for that one. No fair! I bet they will just reboot themselves, hehe.

I sure as hell will take a First Class 2 with less money. Again, I thought time and money was wasted in extra players with CGI crappy powers.
 
I really hope Fox pulls a "Magicians Nephew" and is just waiting to get the final box office receipts from overseas before making an announcement. I really want that First Class 2 sequel. I'm really looking forward to the DVD release this Oct.
 
Amazing how we are hoping there is a magic number for a First Class sequel but Green Lantern has had bad reviews, a 65% drop with only $100 mil plus and Warners is already shouting sequel for that one. No fair! I bet they will just reboot themselves, hehe.

What Studios say and what happens... well... don't believe everything a studio says. Keep in mind, they kept saying they were going to do a sequel to Superman Returns...
 
Still, the good word of mouth might help sales on home video, and the studio is well aware that the film had to deal with the poor word of mouth of the two previous sequels.
Its simple psychology. American and World audiences do not want to see non-contemporary settings in their science fiction movies. Both Watchmen and X:FC proved that. Poor word of mouth for previous movies mean squat if the movie itself is engaging, interesting and doesn't drag. Both X:FC and Green Lantern were affected by this. They had uninteresting, unengaging, dragging boring stories. Its that simple.

Most Sci-Fi movies are non-contemporary, after all for a Sci-Fi movie to be considered contemporary it has to be set in the present day (at time of release).
 
Its simple psychology. American and World audiences do not want to see non-contemporary settings in their science fiction movies. Both Watchmen and X:FC proved that.

If that's the case, then why is the 1970s era Super 8 doing well at the box office? Why did the 1970s era X-Men Origins: Wolverine also do well at the box office?
 
Its simple psychology. American and World audiences do not want to see non-contemporary settings in their science fiction movies. Both Watchmen and X:FC proved that.

This is true as a general rule, but there are always exceptions.

I don't think Watchmen's period setting had much to do with its reception one way or the other.

Super 8 is doing well against its budget but certainly trailing FC.
 
If you asked the average joe on the street, they would probably have no idea that Watchman was a period piece. It suffered at he box office because it was a crappy movie.
 
Watchmen is about as good an adaptation of the comic to film as one could reasonably expect. At least that's what devotees of the comic tend to say.

The apathy toward the film preceded its release and was reflected in the box office. You could already tell during the trailer that preceded The Dark Knight that there was going to be a problem. If you looked around at the faces of the people sitting near you, you saw completely blank expressions for the most part. There was no excitement whatsoever. Then, by the time the film came out, most theater-goers were dutifully lining up for Slumdog Millionaire like the sheep they are, because the Academy Awards rang Pavlov's bell. Most of these people never heard of Danny Boyle and were the ones who looked at you like you were speaking Chinese if you said the word "Trainspotting" to them during the 90s.
 
Last edited:
Watchmen is about as good an adaptation of the comic to film as one could reasonably expect. At least that's what devotees of the comic tend to say.

The apathy toward the film preceded its release and was reflected in the box office. You could already tell during the trailer that preceded The Dark Knight that there was going to be a problem. If you looked around at the faces of the people sitting near you, you saw completely blank expressions for the most part. There was no excitement whatsoever. Then, by the time the film came out, most theater-goers were dutifully lining up for Slumdog Millionaire like the sheep they are, because the Academy Awards rang Pavlov's bell. Most of these people never heard of Danny Boyle and were the ones who looked at you like you were speaking Chinese if you said the word "Trainspotting" to them during the 90s.


Come on... if you were a general audience which would you choose? A dreary comic book movie or a feel good movie? Choices, choices....
 
People always conjure up explanations for box office failure and for box office success, and the only right answer is Goldman's: Nobody Knows Anything.
 
Look, if a movie I like is successful, it means that audiences know a good movie when they see one. If a movie I like is unsuccessful, it means that audiences are sheep who don't know quality when they see it. The same is true if a movie I dislike is successful. If a movie I don't like fails, it's because the movie stunk.

Seriously though, Dennis hit the nail on the head.
 
The audience is always right.

That's because the verdict that the audience passes on something is, ultimately, that they like it or they don't. They cannot be wrong about that.
 
The audience is always right.

That's because the verdict that the audience passes on something is, ultimately, that they like it or they don't. They cannot be wrong about that.
:vulcan:
This is the TREK BBS where a failed show sparked a franchise and the last "failed" series lasted 5 years is it not?
 
I don't think the audience is always right. Box office successes like Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen disprove that notion. It's a shit movie. I don't care how much money it made.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top