...it'd be great. Especially if you got to hang out with Crichton.
To hell with Crichton I wanna meet Aeryn.![]()
Me too, come to think of it.
...it'd be great. Especially if you got to hang out with Crichton.
To hell with Crichton I wanna meet Aeryn.![]()
And Chiana...it'd be great. Especially if you got to hang out with Crichton.
To hell with Crichton I wanna meet Aeryn.![]()
Me too, come to think of it.
Yes, but Star Wars apparently has seat belts.
And I'm almost positive there were safety railings on the bridges of Admiral Ackbar's flagship...
Material wealth isn't the be all and end all of existence. That's a thing of current mentality. Something we as humans strive for today. There would be no desire or need to obtain material wealth in the Star Trek universe but that doesn't mean that there isn't anything worth while to achieve just because you're not making money.
Material wealth isn't the be all and end all of existence. That's a thing of current mentality. Something we as humans strive for today. There would be no desire or need to obtain material wealth in the Star Trek universe but that doesn't mean that there isn't anything worth while to achieve just because you're not making money.
That's a fair point, but you end up with a system where people with glamourous jobs such as starship captain are earning the same 'wage' (nothing) as the person cleaning the toilets at the Starfleet Academy frat houses. How exactly is that fair?
Become a gangster like Jabba.Also I doubt the Star Wars universe would be any better off for one wanting to acquire wealth as an average citizen as per the original posters criteria. In fact it seems to me most people struggle just as much in the Star Wars universe as they do in the real world. Unless you're a Jedi or a politician or already someone with money it's not really a nice universe to be in.
Lightsabers do more damage.
Including to your own anatomy if you're pointing them in the wrong direction. Too dangerous.
Plus, phasers have stun settings. Not only is that ethically preferable,
but do you really want to be inundated in lawsuits from a bunch of people whose arms you've cut off?
Or look at the flip side: since you wouldn't be the only person armed, would you rather endure brief unconsciousness or amputation?
Artoo carries all the sensors I need.
But he can't be folded up and carried on one's belt.
Takeoff and landing are by far the most hazardous actions peformed by any spacecraft, aside from combat. They're also time-consuming, and you probably have to pay hangar fees. Beaming is faster, safer, and pedestrian-friendly.
Except for Wookies, Hutts, astromech droids, Rodians, that guy whose arm Ben cut off, etc., etc. And yet they all seem to understand each other. Either they have some kind of translator implants, in which case the only difference is one of presentation, or they all have to learn one another's languages the hard way even if they don't speak them, in which case there's a lot more studying involved than in Trek.
Except that most "droids" are not actually androids (a word that means "human-shaped"). C-3PO broadly qualifies, but most don't.
Overrated when you own your own ship and can go anywhere you like.holodecks,
But there's money in the SW universe, so presumably it costs a lot more to buy, maintain, and fuel a ship, as well as paying any necessary license, berthing, and customes fees, than it does to say, "Computer, run program."
Besides, at least Trek holograms have full color and opacity and don't constantly have scan lines sweeping through them. The technology to cross the galaxy in days and they can't make a hologram that looks better than a 1950s TV transmission?
However, to your second question, I think I might prefer being a Jedi to a starship captain. I can't really explain that choice with logic, being a Jedi just always sounded cool.
That's a fair point, but you end up with a system where people with glamourous jobs such as starship captain are earning the same 'wage' (nothing) as the person cleaning the toilets at the Starfleet Academy frat houses. How exactly is that fair?
Right, so you learn to handle it properly, just like any other weapon. That's a common sense problem, not a flaw in the concept.
But not tactically preferable if it doesn't put your enemy down for long enough.
The droids in the SW universe may be misnamed, but they serve sentient beings, like they're supposed to do.
True, but I can settle down somewhere and sell the ship, and then I'd have the extra money, something I could never have living in the socialist utopia that is the United Federation of Planets.
Yeah, but they have the technology to cross the galaxy in days. The Trekkers have beamers and phasers and life-like holograms and their ships travel at a slow crawl by comparison.
I'll take a fast ship and monochrome holoprojections over that any day.
However, to your second question, I think I might prefer being a Jedi to a starship captain. I can't really explain that choice with logic, being a Jedi just always sounded cool.
Being a Jedi is terrible. You're taken away from your family at a young age and brainwashed into their bizarre quasi-religious cult. They make you go into battle and yet not form attachments to your fellow soldiers which is the normal reaction of people in combat.
You're not allowed to form attachments with other people, period....
But the worst thing is that Jedi are always in danger of abruptly joining the enemy for reasons that still remain rather unexplained. To put that in Trek terms, envision Starfleet personnel running around with Borg nanoprobes in their bodies, just swimming around and waiting to be activated by some unpredictable outside stimulus. This could happen not just to you but to everyone around you. You never know when and where the boom will be lowered. I don't think I could take the stress.I'm amazed the Jedi aren't a lot more paranoid about each other.
Oops, I just joined the Dark Side. At least they have cookies here.
Star Trek, by leaps and bounds. If I want the excitement of Star Wars, I can run a holoprogram.
Material wealth isn't the be all and end all of existence. That's a thing of current mentality. Something we as humans strive for today. There would be no desire or need to obtain material wealth in the Star Trek universe but that doesn't mean that there isn't anything worth while to achieve just because you're not making money.
That's a fair point, but you end up with a system where people with glamourous jobs such as starship captain are earning the same 'wage' (nothing) as the person cleaning the toilets at the Starfleet Academy frat houses. How exactly is that fair?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.