• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Would you prefer if this new Star Trek show was on a different streaming site?

Why would CBS give business away to a competitor?

I do expect a DVD/Blu release at some point. I'm waiting for that, because there's no way I'm paying to watch commercials. And there's no way I'm paying a second tier to get rid of them. If the quotes from my post above is at all representative, CBS has some real work to do because the business model can't rely on compelled Trekkies alone.
Good thing that there are people like me who like CBS shows :techman:
 
Then why are they partnering with Nexflix outside of N. America?

Individually creating new legal relationships with hundreds, maybe thousands of networks, and then paying accountants to keep track of it, is time and money.

The alternative is that Netflix writes one huge cheque, at the beginning of every new business year.
 
Each of the major studios' syndication divisions, operates an international arm, that can-and already has been, selling to networks, stations and cable systems anywhere and everywhere. For decades. Selling to Netflix outside of N America, was because Netflix offered a fat enough check, and the knowledge that the show would still be desired by buyers and could be sold for just as much money in the "second run", the period that begins after the initial broadcast is done with.
Six months on Netflix, then six months on home video, then available for licensing to basic cable or local tv stations, the same as any other tv show has been handled...the Trek gravy train rolls on. ;)
 
Different arms of the company are competition with one another for bonuses and to avoid punitive dismissals.

The streaming arm of CBS (controlled by a vice president) is not the syndication arm (controlled by a different vice president).

If the streaming arm has to use and farm out it's responsibilities to the syndication arm, until the streaming arm is effectively doing no work at all, what actual point is there to there being a streaming arm to CBS? People will get fired and the division will be absorbed by other elements of CBS who produce noticeable labour and work-product to justify their huge cheques.

(Above is wild speculation based on looking at corporate greed for 30 years. Some companies base their interactive internal policies on synergy, but really? When does that ever end well?)

More so, if this so called streaming arm who controls CBS All Access and creates original material for CBS All Access is only allowed to stream it's original material because of a division of labour in the corporate structure, then other than taking CBS all Access Global, which would have been a huge risk, the only thing out there bigger than Netflix is their foreign language counterparts catering to billions of Chinese, Indians and Russians, or Pornhub.

CBS would have loved that.

"We have an exclusive global deal to let Pornhub distribute Star Trek... But we have to refilm a lot of the first season, adding sex scenes and excessive shirtlessness for mostly the male cast."
 
Last edited:
"We have an exclusive global deal to let Pornhub distribute Star Trek... But we have to refilm a lot of the first season, adding sex scenes and excessive shirtlessness for mostly the male cast."

"Thats not canon!"
"Did someone say canon?!" Trousers off.

Alright, I'm in. Who do I complain to about subscription charges?
 
If the streaming arm has to use and farm out it's responsibilities to the syndication arm, until the streaming arm is effectively doing no work at all, what actual point is there to there being a streaming arm to CBS? People will get fired and the division will be absorbed by other elements of CBS who produce noticeable labour and work-product to justify their huge cheques.

(Above is wild speculation based on looking at corporate greed for 30 years. Some companies base their interactive internal policies on synergy, but really? When does that ever end well?)

"
You're getting hung up on this new fangled "streaming service" labeling. Relax and be calm John Spartan. :)

Everything that has happened before, will happen again. The production and distribution funnel behind the new show is not wildly dissimilar from how things have always worked, the only difference is tne new digital method of delivery....
CBS All Access is merely the "network" if you will. CBS-The Studio will make the show for their corporate sibling. The sale of the program is handled by the studio's distribution division, not the "network" that airs/streams it.

Now, you can now go to The Taco Bell, and chill while munching on a triple double crunchwrap. :rommie:
 
Would you prefer if this new Star Trek show was on a different streaming site, like Netflix or Hulu or Amazon etc?

I have not heard good things about CBS All Access, its library is very limited, it has a ton of commercials, its player is not very good etc. Most user reviews give it a thumbs down. It seems like CBS is trying to take on a couple of giants and they don't have the right tools for the job. CW just made a deal with Netflix to have all its shows stream there and Disney is working with Netflix to stream old and new content.

It would have been way easier if they just put Star Trek on Netflix and made money as a third party content maker, rather then CBS trying to beat Netflix at its own game, where it likely will not win. If CBS All Access fails to be profitable, will this new show get cancelled or will they move it to a better streaming site?

I hope its on Netflix in Canada.



I thought Netflix did make deal with Trek. Aldo, I thought it was going to air on CBS? Is this wrong?
 
CBS owns Star Trek and is making the new series.

In Canada and the US, Star Trek will air on CBS All Access, which is a streaming service that costs 6 dollars a month.

Globally, everywhere else except Canada and the US, Star Trek will air on Netflix.
 
I thought Netflix did make deal with Trek. Aldo, I thought it was going to air on CBS? Is this wrong?
In the US, the show will be exclusively shown on CBS All Access. In Canada, cable network Space will have it. Netflix bought rights to show it outside of the US and Canada across their 188 country footprint.
The rollout for the new STAR TREK series in Canada will mirror the launch in the U.S. The first episode will premiere on Canada’s most watched broadcast network, CTV, on the same night as CBS. All remaining episodes will initially be televised on Bell Media’s cable networks, Space (in English) and Z (in French), and then later exclusively on CraveTV™, Bell Media’s streaming video-on-demand service.
http://www.bellmedia.ca/pr/press/ne...e-long-and-prosper-in-canada-with-bell-media/
 
Well, sorry for saying that I dislike something, esp. since under the current circumstances, I can't watch the show, which I would like to.

Welcome to the rest of the world in the 90s. We got Emissary on subscription tv (actually it was pre-scramble on sky one, just, but most with sky had subscription, and by the end of the season all channels were scrambled) in August 93, not January.

But that was nothing. "Face of the Enemy", from TNG Season 6, was broadcast Dec 93 in the states. In the UK it was October 1995 - nearly 2 years late. All Good Things came out in June 1996 (Generations by comparison was released in the UK in February 1995).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top