That doesn't mean you shouldn't have a good reason for your premise.Well, that's what writing is for.
Seeing how poor the writing got on VOY I think you're asking a little too much of it.Well, that's what writing is for.
No argument there.Seeing how poor the writing got on VOY I think you're asking a little too much of it.Well, that's what writing is for.
If not for Learning Curve, there would be hardly any acknowledging of the Maquis on board in the first season.I didn't necessarily require more conflict, per se, but after a few episodes the Maquis crew may as well have just been Voyager crew. There was no narrative reason to have two crews when you're just going to ignore the fact that they are, in fact, two crews.
And what if you weren't familiar with DS9? Voyager barely even gave us an explanation about who the Maquis were.
I mean, honestly, the pilot could have been "Voyager investigates a comet and gets sucked into the Delta Quadrant. With her first officer and chief engineer dead, Commander Chakotay and B'Elanna Torres are promoted to take their place."
In the grand scheme of things, it would have barely changed anything.
What really made Voyager special was the premise about a ship with a mixed Starfleet and Maquis crew stranded 75 000 light years from home. Without it, I doubt that Voyager would have been as good as it actually was, despite erratic writing.
I don't understand why some posters wanted more conflict between the Starfleet and Maquis crew. Just look at the horrible "Stargate Universe" with its constand bickering and arguing between people and factions to see how blessed we are that we didn't have to stand that on Voyager.
Paradoxically, it's towards the end of the series with episodes like nothing human that the maquis starts voicing its differences.What really made Voyager special was the premise about a ship with a mixed Starfleet and Maquis crew stranded 75 000 light years from home. Without it, I doubt that Voyager would have been as good as it actually was, despite erratic writing.
I don't understand why some posters wanted more conflict between the Starfleet and Maquis crew. Just look at the horrible "Stargate Universe" with its constand bickering and arguing between people and factions to see how blessed we are that we didn't have to stand that on Voyager.
We don't want Stargate Universe level bickering, we want a middle ground.
If Voyager is 0 and Stargate Universe is 100, I would have dialed it to 30 or 40.
I would have set it up so there are lots of Maquis who are rumbling about going off on their own or even talking about a mutiny, but Chakotay is the voice of reason who calmed them down and kept them in line, but also insisted on their interests as well. They kind of did that in season one, but then they all conformed completely, even ideologically.
Problem was, they did that episode where they met the humans transplanted from Earth like Amelia Earhart and Janeway told them that if they wanted to stay they could.
Hardly anyone left, so anyone who stayed was there by choice and had no right to complain.
Being on this forum is like being stuck in a conversational time loop where the same crap gets discussed over and over.....it provides me with a profound sense of comfort
Problem was, they did that episode where they met the humans transplanted from Earth like Amelia Earhart and Janeway told them that if they wanted to stay they could.
Hardly anyone left, so anyone who stayed was there by choice and had no right to complain.
Being on this forum is like being stuck in a conversational time loop where the same crap gets discussed over and over.....it provides me with a profound sense of comfort
Anyway
Far more unrealistic than people not wanting to stay was the 37's not wanting to leave. Earhart is an adventurer who was notorious for taking risks and looking for excitement. Voyager has us believe that she's given up on all that and decided to stay on a planet and push out babies. She was adventurous, a risk taker, a thrill seeker and she was circumnavigating the globe then......poof......she wakes up in the future.
......And has suddenly decided to become someone who wants to settle down on a planet and make a nice cosy home
Go explore the universe and visit a potential future Earth that is beyond your comprehension......nah, I'll stay here and make some lovely home made soup
Bye then Kath
Neelix started his "relationship" with Janeway by lying to her and tricking her and her staff into going in a dangerous situation just to free his girlfriend under false pretenses and for that he's quickly rewarded with a plum function on the ship. I don't know. Some things just don't make a lot of sense. Also note that everyone that hates Paris' guts in the first episode... dies. I suspect foul play.Problem was, they did that episode where they met the humans transplanted from Earth like Amelia Earhart and Janeway told them that if they wanted to stay they could.
Hardly anyone left, so anyone who stayed was there by choice and had no right to complain.
I don't agree with that logic. "Give up all hope of seeing your home again tomorrow" or "Absolutely conform to a military you didn't enlist in" is a false imperative. Neelix was expected to act within the rules, but not to conform absolutely, and that shouldn't have been expected of the Maquis either.
This kind of intrigues me, the separate Trek shows working in a more open context with each other.IMO Stargate SG-1 and Atlantis got that right by not denying the multiple shows were all co-existing in different places of the same universe in their various plots, freely referencing and crossing over plots, characters and backstories.
Mark
The central premise of Voyager was to put two diverse crews (and then some) and cut them off from all that was familiar to them, and set them on a journey home. Whether that was successful or not is one thing, but that was the idea.
But far earlier than that, there was originally talk of just prolonging TNG into season eight and beyond; if Patrick Stewart wasn't continuing, to place Riker in charge, get a bunch of new crew, and keep on truckin' on the Enterprise-D.
So let's split the difference here. What if Berman & Piller & Taylor had decided to do with a new ship and wholly Starfleet crew and keep them doing along various Alpha Quadrant adventures? Heck, what if we got a show with the original Voyager crew, including Commander Cavit, Dr. Fitzgerald, Lt. Stadi, and some un-named Chief Engineer?
I think it could have been fine keeping it local. There would be lots of potential to interact with TNG and DS9 crews, plus we'd develop the AQ while still having both good and mediocre new worlds and new civilizations to bump into. Post-First Contact, the Borg would surely be brought back into it as well.
So would things have been that different? Based on how Voyager turned out, I don't think it would have. Your thoughts?
Mark
Dukhat said:The thing is, most of the time in VOY we got exactly what we would have gotten if they'd been in the Alpha Quadrant anyway.
And I would have left the series when it happened.It could've allowed the war to be even larger and on a grander scale, with crossover episodes between DS9 and VOY.
It is doubtful in the extreme I would have returned for this either.Then after the war ended and DS9 finished the crew could've been reassigned to relief and reconstruction work in Cardassian space.
It is the character work explored like it is that I am drawn to, has my admiration.Character work could also have been explored differently.
<sigh> This character is as dull as dishwater to you, and others. This character is interesting and an integral necessary part of the dynamic to me and others.(thereby removing the dull as dishwater Kim)
Well, there it is. I admire your clearly well thought out ideas of where and how Voyager could improve to better serve your tastes and what you think it needed under the OP scenario. And clearly I just don't relate.EMH only as a recurring character. No Neelix, Kes (unfortunately), or Seven.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.