• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Worst lines of dialogue in Trek?

It's like in the US Flag Code, which talks about the proper way to honorably dispose of an old flag (via burning) as opposed to those who would disrespect the flag (via burning). The sacred tree has been dishonored, (literally) soiled by this alien creature, and Archer needs to destroy it and restore its honor.

A flag is only that, a piece of cloth that only exists for the symbolic value superimposed on it. A flag serves no other purpose, in principle. (Well, you could perhaps try to use it as a jacket or a shopping bag but that's not what it's intended for). The tree is a living biological entity with its own independent existence, with a symbolic value superimposed on it. If you have to destroy it because it has become "soiled" in that symbolical sense, but only in that symbolic sense (biologically there's nothing wrong), it becomes more like a sacrifice, in my eyes, (an animal that had to be slaughtered because something in the symbolic, or at least immaterial domain went wrong, for example to "appease" a god).

Besides, even if the flag has been soiled (but not damaged beyond repair), there is no objection to simply cleaning it according to that code, as I understand it, at least. Burning is only called for when the flag is so tattered that it cannot be used again. If they can think of that provision for a simple cloth, why can't it be done for a living thing?

(And that's not even considering my own opinion, which would be that after the piece of cloth served its purpose as a flag and is now worn out, it simply loses to have that symbolic meaning and can be disposed of as seen fit; it's the symbol that is important, not the material object. Having to burn it in an "honourable" way would feel to me as symbolism taken a bit too far, but I'll agree that's personal.).
 
Last edited:
EDIT: just rewatched the ep. So, Porthos pees on a sacred tree, and Archer has to ritually apologize by (chain)sawing a tree in small slices arrange those slices in geometric patterns, and present those to the "elders" or some such persons. The same tree Porthos peed upon? If so, that's one messed up culture ....

Well, it is an episode of Enterprise, so some stupidity is to be expected.
 
EDIT: just rewatched the ep. So, Porthos pees on a sacred tree, and Archer has to ritually apologize by (chain)sawing a tree in small slices arrange those slices in geometric patterns, and present those to the "elders" or some such persons. The same tree Porthos peed upon? If so, that's one messed up culture ....

Honestly, I doubt that Braga and Berman thought about it that deeply. They just wanted the non-sequitur from Hoshi when she asks "Do we have a chainsaw on board?" right before the cut to commercial. And then later they we got the 'funny' visual of Archer with the beads in his hair while wielding the chainsaw.
 
^ Well, the scene includes a shot of this PADD (https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ritual_sectioning ) which Archer is consulting when sawing. So I would argue that him "sectioning" a tree of at least the exact same kind (an "alvera tree") was very much part of their explicit intention. If it was from the very beginning, or only a detail thrown in at the last instant for a bit more coherence, I can't say, of course.
 
I'm almost positive that a PADD diagram like that would have been created by the art department as a part of the production process. I'd be very surprised if it was described in the script in any detail.
 
Even if it was planned from the very beginning, they probably didn't think very deeply into it. As amp wrote they probably just thought it was funny so they put it in the script.
You can frequently see things in shows (even/especially serialized ones) where it's clear that somebody just wanted a scene they thought would be "cool" or "funny" but that doesn't make much/any sense withibln the larger fictional work or fails common logic.
 
From "Thine Own Self"

DATA: "Counsellor, have you been promoted in my absence?"
TROI: "That's right. Which means from now on you can call me sir."
DATA: "Yes, sir."


I hate everything about that exchange: calling women "sir", Data not being a commander himself, and the fact that I don't think Deanna passed the test (it was a test of character, not a puzzle to be solved). That plus Data would have simply wrecked it: "Do not worry, Geordi. I will repair the ODN conduit myself. The radiation will not harm me."
 
Isn't this a bit like referring to the United Federation of Planets as the Federal Federation?

I am redundently annoyed by the many redundent claims that the phrase "Klingon Imperial Empire' is redundent, so I will redundently refute that claim several times over.

One) Isn't it common in English for words to have more than one meaning, and for more than one word to have the same meaning.

So it is perfectly possible that :Imperial" is a translation of a Klingon adjective that is completely unrelated to the Klingon noun which is trnslated as "empire" in "kingon Imperial Empire"..

Two) There were a number of separate Boer or Afrikaner states and republics in 19th century Africa - usually 2 or more at the same time. This is an example of a nationality or an ethnic group having more than one sovereign state at the same time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boer_Republics

How many separate and independent soverign Greek city states were there in Classical Greece and around the Mediterranean? Tens. Possibly more than a hundred. So that is an example of an ethnic group or nationality having tens or even more than a hundred separate soverign states.

There grew to be over 1,000 city-states in ancient Greece, but the main poleis were Athína (Athens), Spárti (Sparta), Kórinthos (Corinth), Thíva (Thebes), Siracusa (Syracuse), Égina (Aegina), Ródos (Rhodes), Árgos, Erétria, and Elis.

https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/greek-city-states/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ancient_Greek_cities

In the present time there is North and South Korea, the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China, the former South and North Vietnam, and the former German Democratic Republic and Federal Republic of Germany. All showing that a nationality or ethnic group can have more than one soverign state at the same time.

So if the Klingons are analogous to a nationality or an ethic group they can have more than one sovereign state.

If Klingons are defined as a species of intelligent beings, scientists do not agree on more than one such species existing at the present time with political organizations which can be studied. I note that I have seen a historical article claiming that the total number of separate independent sovereign politcal entities among the human species has declined from about tens or hundreds of thousands several thosuand years ago to about 50 at one point in the 20th century and then increased to about 200 today. I believe the article calculated that there should be only one sovereign human government by about AD 4000 or so.

So I suspect that various splinter groups of Klingons constantly found their own states which last for longer or shorter times. I think that Gorkon's Klingon realm was probably not the only Klingon realm in his time, though probably by far the most important, and that a lot of Klingon groups broke away from Gorkon's realm and founded their own realms after the events in Star Trek: The Undiscovered Country.

So possibly there are a bunch of Klingon realms in the era of TNG with names like Klingon Imperial Republic, Klingon Royal Republic, Klingon Republican Republic, Klingon Imperial Kingdom, Klingon Royal Kingdom, Klingon Republican Kingdom, Klingon Imperial Empire, Klingon Royal Empire, and Klingon Republican Empire, to say nothing of the Klingon realms with long and complicted names.

Three) What is the best example of an emipire in Earth history? There could be many possible examples, but one which many would choose would be the Roman Empire.

The first emperor seized absolute power with his army, but pretened to be merely the mos tinfluential senator, and had the Senate and people grant him a number of Republican offices and powers to provide Repuliban justification for his authority. Thus Roman emperors were known by a number of different titels, such as: Princeps, Caesar, Imperator, Augustus, Pontifex Maximus, Dominus, etc.

Often a heir to the throne or a junior emperor would be an Imperator Caesar, while a senior emperor would be an Imperator Caesar Augustus. This sort of implies that the word .Augustus, or the three word phrase .Imperator Caesar Augustus, should be considered to be the imperial title.

In the Greek speaking east of the Roman Empire, hte imperial titles were often transliterated into the Greek alphabet. But they were also often translated into Greek words which were not very accurate translations.

The Emperor was often called Basileus, which originally meant the king of a tiny Greek city state, but was then used in the sense of "King of the World", and very roughly equivalent to Emperor.

And the Latin tittle of imperator was translated, not very accurately, into Greek as autokrator.

By about AD 900 the title of the senior eastern emperor was usually Basileus kai Autokrator ton Rhomaion, which is usually translated as "emperor and Autocrat of the Romans". A more literal translation would be "King and Empreror of the Romans". Basileus kai Autokrator could be considere a three word phrase emeaning emperor, making the title "Emperor of the Romans", or it could be translated as "Emperor and Emperor of the Romans"..

Charlemagne,the first Holy Roman Emperor, use a long title:

In his official charters, Charles preferred the style Karolus serenissimus Augustus a Deo coronatus magnus pacificus imperator Romanum gubernans imperium[109] ("Charles, most serene Augustus crowned by God, the great, peaceful emperor ruling the Roman empire") to the more direct Imperator Romanorum ("Emperor of the Romans").

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne#Imperial_title

Imperator augustus was the title of the early Holy Roman Emperors. Imperator augustus could be interpreted as a two word phrase meaning "emperor"..Or it could be interpreted as "emperor emperor".

By about 1200 the person elected future emperor used the title of Rex Romanourm et semper Augustus, which seems to translate as "King of the Romans and always Emperor". When and if he was crowned emperor in Rome by the pope, he used the title of Rex Romanourm et semper Augustuss, "Emperor of the Romans and always Emperor".

I have seen semper Augustuss translated into English as "always august". And I suspect that was done by people who never suspected that that there could possibly have been redundently imperial imperius Roman Emperors.

Four) So I get a little annoyed when peopel write that "Klingon imperial Empire" is redundent.

What I don't like is the order of words in the phrase. It seems much more natural in the English language to write names like "Royal Klingon Republic" and "Demoratic Klingon Kingdom" and "Imperial Klingon Empire"

So I wonder if the "Klinngon Imperial Empire" is named to show that it is different - being ruled by Klingons - from some other "imperial empires" which are known, such as the Romulan Imperial Empire, the Breen Imperial Empire, the Denubian imperial empire, etc.
 
Last edited:
That plus Data would have simply wrecked it: "Do not worry, Geordi. I will repair the ODN conduit myself. The radiation will not harm me."

Wesley’s experience in “Coming of Age” seems pretty conclusive that Starfleet’s weird psycho-torture tests are heavily customized and individually crafted to specifically traumatize the person taking them. Data’s version of the test would’ve been very different (and may even have had a different solution, if his proctor thought he wouldn’t hesitate to make the rational call of sacrificing a friend to save the ship, and so needed Data to demonstrate another aspect of command ability).
 
Also Last Outpost, Data and Riker basically having the same conversation twice in a row. Riker says the Ferengi sound like his ancestors, Data tells him not to be so optimistic.
 
RAND: He's the real spook. Suppose he's going space happy or something? (“The Man Trap”)
h60UD15.jpg

SPOCK: The, er, impostor had some interesting qualities, wouldn't you say, Yeoman? (“The Enemy Within”)
gVIPwMW.jpg

DESALLE: Maybe we can't break it, but I'll bet you credits to navy beans we can put a dent in it. (“Catspaw”)
2QojB41.jpg

ADAM: Oh, Herbert, you are stiff! (“The Way to Eden”)
lbBISEU.jpg
 
RAND: He's the real spook. Suppose he's going space happy or something? (“The Man Trap”)

DESALLE: Maybe we can't break it, but I'll bet you credits to navy beans we can put a dent in it. (“Catspaw”)
What's wrong with those lines?

ADAM: Oh, Herbert, you are stiff! (“The Way to Eden”)
That's what she said!

(Sorry, I can never resist the obvious.) :shrug:
 
The line from “The Man Trap” sounds like corny space opera that would have been hard for even Nelson Bond to write with a straight face. It doesn’t track with the hard-edged, timeless realism that colors the dialogue between the leads throughout the episode. And the whole Rand/Sulu scene doesn’t sound at all like George Clayton Johnson.

As for “Catspaw,” well I guess I just don’t care for updating 20th century cliches to fit into the 23rd. Or maybe it was Barrier’s line reading.

Out of 80 episodes, though, these are only ones that make me wince.* YMMV, of course.

*All of the hippie speak sets my teeth on edge, but that’s true of Lost in Space, Dragnet, and any other show that couldn’t get down the idioms of the times they were written in.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top