Good grief, ZR! You need to put a WARNING on that!
I think the file name says it all, though.![]()
What? Zardoz1? Am I supposed to know what that is?
Good grief, ZR! You need to put a WARNING on that!
I think the file name says it all, though.![]()
Good grief, ZR! You need to put a WARNING on that!
I think the file name says it all, though.![]()
What? Zardoz1? Am I supposed to know what that is?
I think she was kidding ZR.
Things that come to mind
Zardoz
Cage in most of his roles, but the remake of Wicker Man takes the cake...
the first Casino Royal...
any actor in a Uwe Boll film.
though TV tropes, which is rapidly approaching the list of "Super awesome websites" has a classic "Bruce Boxleitner in The Mockbuster Transmorphers: Fall of Man. This being a freaking Mockbuster, it can't be any other reason. Hell, anything he's done apart from TRON and Babylon 5 probably does."
How bout Frank Langella as Skeletor in Masters of the Universe.
Dennis Hopper in Super Mario Brothers.
He once said in an interview that his son asked him why he took that part. Dennis explained: well, you needed new sneakers so daddy needed a job. His son was quiet for a moment, then replied: I didn't need new sneakers that bad.
I really don't think Casino Royale belongs with those others. Yes, the Bond purists scoff because it's not part of the official series and yes, even as a spoof it's not without its problems, but it can't in seriousness be called the worst gig ever for any of the principals involved.Things that come to mind
Zardoz
Cage in most of his roles, but the remake of Wicker Man takes the cake...
the first Casino Royal...
any actor in a Uwe Boll film.
though TV tropes, which is rapidly approaching the list of "Super awesome websites" has a classic "Bruce Boxleitner in The Mockbuster Transmorphers: Fall of Man. This being a freaking Mockbuster, it can't be any other reason. Hell, anything he's done apart from TRON and Babylon 5 probably does."
I really don't think Casino Royale belongs with those others. Yes, the Bond purists scoff because it's not part of the official series and yes, even as a spoof it's not without its problems, but it can't in seriousness be called the worst gig ever for any of the principals involved.
I really don't think Casino Royale belongs with those others. Yes, the Bond purists scoff because it's not part of the official series and yes, even as a spoof it's not without its problems, but it can't in seriousness be called the worst gig ever for any of the principals involved.
Peter Sellers might disagree. Didn't he walk out in the middle of the production, which was part of the reason it was so disjointed?
There would seem to be a number of versions of what happened, including one in which Sellers was fired for erratic behavior including frequent departures from the script, failure to appear on the set for days at a time and a refusal even to be in the studio when Orson Welles was present. I suspect we may never know exactly what happened, and anything about it being anyone's worst gig is necessarily speculation. What's reasonably certain is that shooting it was a messy business which ran far over schedule and required significant editing and rewrites to fix or replace scenes which were supposed to feature Sellers but for which some of his parts were never filmed. What they finally ended up with was pretty entertaining, though.I really don't think Casino Royale belongs with those others. Yes, the Bond purists scoff because it's not part of the official series and yes, even as a spoof it's not without its problems, but it can't in seriousness be called the worst gig ever for any of the principals involved.
Peter Sellers might disagree. Didn't he walk out in the middle of the production, which was part of the reason it was so disjointed?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.