• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Word Usage in Trek

Laura Cynthia Chambers

Vice Admiral
Admiral
While perusing Memory Alpha, I've noticed that some phrases are (mostly) unique to certain Trek shows. Hyperventilat(e, ed, ing, ion), for instance, appears only in Voyager. (3 of 5 times it's applied to Neelix.)

Has anyone else noticed this?
 
All Trek shows from 1966-2005 use the word "technology". Only newer entities seem to use the toddlerfied version, termed as "tech".

Seriously. If it's big and does critical things that help people, it's technology. If it's an overpriced toy to pacify, distract as the 4 to 6" shiny thing that they are known to do, and arguably kill honeybees with signal distortions but all us kids hated calciferous vegetables in favor of corn chips anyway, and/or cause cancer cells to waken and screech "Cooie, I'm awake now, time for radiation treatments!" inside who knows how many species of critters, then maybe "tech" is qualified as a noun, but not to be confused with "technician".
 
"Quantum" became popular with TNG and later shows. To my knowledge, never used in TOS. (Although Demora Sulu says 'quantum interference' in Generations, I'll still count that as TNG ). Which I find interesting, since the term quantum mechanics itself was first used in a 1924 paper, so it was definitely known back at the time of TOS. I take it therefore 'quantum' became cool as a sciency buzzword somewhere between TOS and TNG ?
 
The term "some kind of" tended to get overused in nineties Trek.

Kor
I remember a fanfic that made fun of that, with the bridge officer reporting "some kind of energy surge" and the commanding officer irritably replying "could you at least tell me what kind of energy surge it was?"
 
"Quantum" became popular with TNG and later shows. To my knowledge, never used in TOS. (Although Demora Sulu says 'quantum interference' in Generations, I'll still count that as TNG ). Which I find interesting, since the term quantum mechanics itself was first used in a 1924 paper, so it was definitely known back at the time of TOS. I take it therefore 'quantum' became cool as a sciency buzzword somewhere between TOS and TNG ?
Ah, yes. Quantum torpedoes, quantum phase variances, quantum flux, quantum filaments, quantum resonance, quantum oatmeal, etc. :ack:

Kor
 
Ah, yes. Quantum torpedoes, quantum phase variances, quantum flux, quantum filaments, quantum resonance, quantum oatmeal, etc. :ack:

Kor
Quantum Singularity is the term I remember hearing the most. Most physicists would probably just call it a singularity, but I think for technobabble purposes, the term used was better. Unfortunately, when I think of the term now, I can't help but hear Auralio Voltaire's "Sexy Data Tango".:guffaw:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Tachyon beam seems to be a phrase that pops up a lot. Also ____ distortion. (Fill in the blank)
 
Tachyon beam seems to be a phrase that pops up a lot. Also ____ distortion. (Fill in the blank)

Spatial, energy, localized, time, wormhole, temporal, polarized magnetic, subspace, synchronic, space-time, theta flux, frequency, dimensional, gravimetric, subspace field, sensory, warp, timewarp, chronometric, graviton, asynchronous mode, Orassin, gravimetric field, local field, Cochrane, inertial, thermal, subharmonic, wave, and optical.

That's all the ones I could find.
 
Ah, yes. Quantum torpedoes, quantum phase variances, quantum flux, quantum filaments, quantum resonance, quantum oatmeal, etc. :ack:

Kor

Kate Mulgrew has a story where a lady told her that she quit watching Voyager because she couldn't figure out what a quantum singularity was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
Spatial, energy, localized, time, wormhole, temporal, polarized magnetic, subspace, synchronic, space-time, theta flux, frequency, dimensional, gravimetric, subspace field, sensory, warp, timewarp, chronometric, graviton, asynchronous mode, Orassin, gravimetric field, local field, Cochrane, inertial, thermal, subharmonic, wave, and optical.

That's all the ones I could find.
What, no quantum distortion?? :eek:

Kor
 
I hated cascade failures and level three diagnostics with a passion.
Whats the difference between the diagnostic levels supposed to be anyway? Level 1 = a sloppy diagnosis, 2 = a little less sloppy, 3 = actually trying to find out what the problem is?
 
Higher levels require more time and resources. I think a level 3 proceeds at a pace compatible with a 44-minute TV show.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top