Will Rachel Return As Catwoman in Batman 3?
- Thread starter Aike
- Start date
She is not Catwoman.
Have you actually watched the movie? She was locked in a building that was blown to smithereens. How could she possibly have survived? We didn't see her die because of the frigging explosion!
She's not coming back as kitty litter, never mind Catwoman.
She's not coming back as kitty litter, never mind Catwoman.
Sean Young has a better chance at being Catwoman than Rachel Dawes.
^ Sean Connery probably has a better chance too ...
I'd pay to see that.
Yeah, I have seen it. But how do we know that the Joker gave them the right address?
Catwoman = Selina Kyle. Even I know that. 
You don't read a lot of comic books do you?
I don't think she'll be back, but it'd take a lot more than an explosion to ensure the permanent demise of a Batman character.
Because Batman found Harvey's two-face coin at the site of the explosion which had been in Rachel's possession.
You know, I wouldn't put it past Nolan to have Rachel actually be Talia al Ghul, which a lot of people seem to speculate from time to time. I kind of seriously doubt it but hey, you never know.
Would you please pass the straws?
You don't read a lot of comic books do you?
I don't think she'll be back, but it'd take a lot more than an explosion to ensure the permanent demise of a Batman character.
This isn't a comic book. Did you miss the bit where Nolan said he was trying to do a realistic, real-world take on the Batman mythos?
Here are two possible plots for Batman 3:
1. Rachel did die. But only metaphorically. She will become Selina Kyle, also known as Catwoman, and Batman will have to face his worst nightmare: fighting the woman he loved and thought was dead.
2. Rachel didn´t die. But will be Batwoman and help Batman in his battle against Catwoman. From the FAQ of The Dark Knight on IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0000184/
1. Rachel did die. But only metaphorically. She will become Selina Kyle, also known as Catwoman, and Batman will have to face his worst nightmare: fighting the woman he loved and thought was dead.
2. Rachel didn´t die. But will be Batwoman and help Batman in his battle against Catwoman. From the FAQ of The Dark Knight on IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0000184/
I'm sorry, but this has to be one of the most clueless questions I think I've ever heard. You claim to have watched the movie, but, if that's true, you obviously weren't paying attention to what happened. Batman, in following The Joker's instructions, was going to try and save Rachel - the woman he loved - himself, while entrusting Gordon and the police to rescue Dent. It turned out, however, that The Joker had switched the addresses; the location where Rachel was supposed to be being held was actually where Harvey was being held, and the location where Harvey was supposed to be being held was actually where Rachel was being held.
I appreciate the thought you're putting into this... and stranger things have happened. Tonally, I just don't think either scenario would fit in with the world Christopher Nolan has created.
You don't read a lot of comic books do you?
I don't think she'll be back, but it'd take a lot more than an explosion to ensure the permanent demise of a Batman character.
This isn't a comic book. Did you miss the bit where Nolan said he was trying to do a realistic, real-world take on the Batman mythos?
That is pretty much a contradiction in terms. Neither of Nolan's films were realistic. The notion of doing a "realistic, real-world" film about a billionaire who fights crime in tights is nothing short of laughable.
Similar threads
