• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Will Jaylah Replace Chekov?

I'm torn. I quite liked her in Beyond, but couldn't help wondering whether her time should have been used either to do something with the villain (the villain is why Beyond just doesn't work for me) or further develop Uhura, Chekhov etc.

It might be wisest for them to use the screentime on either established characters or on developing the antagonist. But I'm sure I'd enjoy seeing her again, if they bring her back and if there's a 4th movie at all.
 
I like her tremendously but I'm hesitant to think she could become the Kelvin universe's Seven of Nine, shoe-horning out the supporting regular cast. I think she's far more interesting as an assistant for Scotty than Keenser. Stick Ilia at navigation.
 
With a big cast like this, the lack of development for most of the regulars, and the trend of making it the kirk show already, I understand and share some people's trepidation over them possibly shoe-horning Jaylah or another original character when the little screentime they have in a movie could, and should, be used to further develop the existing characters and their dynamics - not to try to find pretexts to give new characters something to do.

The problem with new characters is exactly that because the iconic crew is taken for granted and might get sidelined under the assumption the audience knows them already or enough, while with the new character there is an effort to make them visible and known to the audience, which may result in them being pretentioustly placed in certain scenes (eg the comics writer did that a bit with Carol in some issues where she'd be included in some moments just for the sake of reminding us of her presence and not because she had something to do, all the while you wouldn't see some of the main 7 for entire issues regardless their expertise possibly being useful for the mission at hand)

I think new characters should stay secondary and play secondary roles in context of scenes where their presence makes sense. They should be a plus that the narrative permits, but the priority for me is developing what you already have before painting yourself into a corner by adding too many characters and stories you won't be able - wont have the time - to develop.
 
Eh, I like her as a character but I should point out she wouldn't be "replacing" or shoveling in the TOS cast.

I'd basically think of her as becoming the Kelvin-verse version of Saavik.

The person who is there as the newer unfamiliar member of the crew now that everyone else is older and more settled.
 
I think the idea is that NuBurnham for instance might have led a very different life. How would Vulcan being destroyed affected her? Or maybe her life veered off course at an earlier point than that. Maybe Captain Georgiou was Lt Georgiou on the Kelvin and was killed in 2233 in the Alt timeline, and never had a chance to mentor Burnham. Or somesuch. It wouldn't be story continuity crossover, just reimagined versions of the same characters and unlike TOS, the same actors could play the same parts.

Honestly, since she wasn't beamed up with the Vulcan High Council, I imagine Michael died on Vulcan.
 
Many Vulcans presumably live off world, and not just those in Starfleet or in foreign embassies. Colonies, merchant traders, etc. Burnham could easily be anywhere. Sybok I assume was off world, maybe Saavik and elderly T'Pol too. At the very least it would be easy to have them alive as needed.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top