I was at a friend's house a few weeks ago and my wife and I were getting ready to leave. Their TV was on and Me-TV was showing "The Trouble With Tribbles.' This friend, who is roughly my age - she's about 45ish - stopped saying goodbye to us to ask me a question about how the tribbles moved when they approached Klingons. "Honestly," I said, "I'm not 100%. Looks like a mechanism or--" and she interrupted to blurt out, "is Shatner just twitching them with his hand?" "Uh, maybe, I guess that's a possibility." She laughed - I mean really hard - and said, "this show was so poorly made!"
This is kind of what I see sometimes and it's annoying, really. I mean, Jesus H. Peterson, it's a 50 year old show and even with the (not cheap) budgets, the technology, not to mention time, just wasn't there to do what can be done today. What astonishes me is that this wasn't some kid spoiled by CGI. She's an intelligent science whiz who is only a few years younger than I am. I just don't get how people cannot, or refuse to, see shows and movies in the context of the times they were made. So, no, the sets won't be up to modern standards, the composite model shots won't be without heavy grain, bleed or garbage mattes, and the costumes and performances will be indicative of the styles of the day.
Star Trek wasn't cheap, it wasn't poorly made (for the most part), and it wasn't camp (for the most part). It was made 50 years ago. And it holds up a hell of a lot better than a lot of other TV of the day.
Why King Kong gets a pass and Star Trek doesn't remains a mystery.
This is kind of what I see sometimes and it's annoying, really. I mean, Jesus H. Peterson, it's a 50 year old show and even with the (not cheap) budgets, the technology, not to mention time, just wasn't there to do what can be done today. What astonishes me is that this wasn't some kid spoiled by CGI. She's an intelligent science whiz who is only a few years younger than I am. I just don't get how people cannot, or refuse to, see shows and movies in the context of the times they were made. So, no, the sets won't be up to modern standards, the composite model shots won't be without heavy grain, bleed or garbage mattes, and the costumes and performances will be indicative of the styles of the day.
Star Trek wasn't cheap, it wasn't poorly made (for the most part), and it wasn't camp (for the most part). It was made 50 years ago. And it holds up a hell of a lot better than a lot of other TV of the day.
Why King Kong gets a pass and Star Trek doesn't remains a mystery.
Last edited: