• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why such poor continuity?

commodore64

Vice Admiral
Admiral
Some of the writing on ST has been like, "Uh, where were you for the last __ episodes?" if not the entire season. I was always amazed that T'Pol's Pa'naar, Trellium, Fallara all were completely ignored from season to season (except for Kir'Shara's pathetic mention of Pa'naar syndrome). I was offended when Reed and Archer said, "Wow, T'Pol has a sense of humor. Go figure!" when they had both witnessed it and Archer had commented on it before.

Time and time again easy and obvious storylines were missed or ignored. Why?

What do you guys think? Did it bother you as much as me? Do you think they purposefully ignored stuff and hoped we weren't smart enough to figure it out? Do you think they dumped storylines (trellium) because they couldn't handle it?

I'm stumped!
 
Perhaps they didn't find them as interesting as you do. As for the sense of humor thing. Seems like a pretty minor thing to get offended by. In the real world one can comment on someone's surprising sense of humor or lack there of repeatedly. An injoke or running gag among friends and co-workers.
 
eh being a star trek fan since first run it didnt bother me because we have seen so much of it through the series incluuding tos itself.
rather there were story lines i wish had been revisited then gotten hung up on whether tpols sense of humor had become more above board then the subtle kind we had seen before (which is how i took the bound scene)
shrug.

i think the season season would have been far better if some of the first season enterprise story lines had been explored in the second season and if cease fire had happened earlier.



you even had tos saying things like
spock// Pure energy. Matter without form.
jim ...Impossible.


in a freaking second season episode well after the organians and other similar beings had been seen.


it is what happens in episodic tv with a heavy often rushed production schedule.

add in as different writers come in they have their own vision of the characters.
 
The longer a show is on the air, the more chances of continuity errors taking place. As was stated, there are a lot of people getting their hands into the production of the show.
It reminds me of the business with Richie Cunningham's older brother, Chuck.
 
Continuity glitches and snafus occur on all TV shows, even fairly important ones like to which you refer. It's just a fact of programming; the guys writing these shows are neither encyclopedias nor geniuses.
 
These aren't errors so much as not following up on something (or, what seemed more common, following up on it only when they felt like having an episode specifically for it). T'Pol's Panaar plot did continue (starting in season one, continuing to season 2, and finishing in season 4), but it was practically an episode a piece (I can't remember if there were 2 episodes in season 2 that mentioned it. Probably just one, unless it was mentioned in The Expanse). T'Pol sense of humor things were just jokes in the show, so that's not really a big deal.
 
I don't think the continuity was that bad. Frankly, I don't blame them for not following up on the Panar Syndrome storyline too much, considering the how dare you do an AIDS allegory episode 15 years too late!? response Stigma got. As for commenting on T'Pol's sense of humor: happens all the time in real life. I can recall lots of times when someone has said something along the lines of "X has a sense of humor/X made a joke! Who knew?" Doesn't mean X has literally never said anything humorous ever. The comment was itself a joke, not a serious observation. No offense taken here.
 
JingleBell Jarok said:
These aren't errors so much as not following up on something (or, what seemed more common, following up on it only when they felt like having an episode specifically for it). T'Pol's Panaar plot did continue (starting in season one, continuing to season 2, and finishing in season 4), but it was practically an episode a piece (I can't remember if there were 2 episodes in season 2 that mentioned it. Probably just one, unless it was mentioned in The Expanse). T'Pol sense of humor things were just jokes in the show, so that's not really a big deal.

I disagree. These are just some of the errors, and by the way -- these aren't even including the continuity errors from other series like TOS:

* Archer's father passed away when he was 12 (Cold Station 12) or after he passed a pilot's test (Daedalus). This continuity error was made in the same season.

* T'Pol had to take trellium to release her emotions she claimed in Damage, but in Stigma, she talked about how on the surface her emotions were due to Pa'naar and how she couldn't control them. One would think she could stop controlling her emotions then, rather than take trellium. This continuity error was made less than a season apart. This also doesn't take into account that she indicated when she remembered the Vulcan supression ritual in The Seventh and claimed it'd be harder to control her emotions why she wasn't a nervous wreck. The Seventh, Stigma and Damage are literally one season apart.

* What happened to the Suliban cell ship from Communicator, and why didn't they use it in the Expanse?

* Archer indicated he'd lived all his life in San Francisco, but claimed in season 3 (North Star) that he was born in upstate NY.

* Trip talked about the Starfleet Training Corps in Observer Effect in season 4, but then claimed he'd never graduated from the academy in These Are the Voyages in season 4. (This one bothers me the least. I think it makes more sense if hardly anyone goes through STC back then.)

* Hoshi is afraid of her own shadow in nearly every season (leading up to season 3 where she learns to grow up a little), but suddenly claims in Observer Effect she's a martial arts expert and a bad ass.

I'm sure reasons can be made up - like my comment about Trip, but ... it's noncanon. It just seems weird to me. The Bible, which I've seen, is less of a character sheet and more of a couple of bullet items per person. The writers, imo, didn't care as much about these characters and the resu lt - despite the Enterprise gang being fun and likable characters - shows. I feel sorry many times for the actors, who (as Jolene has mentioned many times) probably saw a few scripts and went, "WTF?"

I don't think the continuity was that bad. Frankly, I don't blame them for not following up on the Panar Syndrome storyline too much, considering the how dare you do an AIDS allegory episode 15 years too late!? response Stigma got.

I don't really think they paid any mind to anyone here. And if they did -- they weren't too bright. This place tends to talk in black and white absolutes about pretty much every issue with venom, anger and with a level of detail no one cares about other than ... the small number of us.

As for commenting on T'Pol's sense of humor: happens all the time in real life. I can recall lots of times when someone has said something along the lines of "X has a sense of humor/X made a joke! Who knew?" Doesn't mean X has literally never said anything humorous ever. The comment was itself a joke, not a serious observation. No offense taken here.

I didn't think Bakula delivered the line that way -- with sarcasm. And the line wasn't, "Well, look who developed a sense of humor." It bugged me. Besides, Archer in some of the tag scenes (like Future Tense) shakes his head as T'Pol delivers a zinger. I think that works much better in the same way I loved when Kirk gave a wry smile to McCoy after Spock got in the last zinger.
 
Kegek Kringle said:
Continuity glitches and snafus occur on all TV shows, even fairly important ones like to which you refer. It's just a fact of programming; the guys writing these shows are neither encyclopedias nor geniuses.
They didn't have to be.

All that was necessary is that someone would review the aired episode and add the events and any backstory details mentioned in the show to the character bibles.

Then the writers could have a source to be sure they they weren't contradicting something that had come before.

The most grating one that comes to mind for me: Archer's father dying twice.
 
commodore64 said:
* Archer's father passed away when he was 12 (Cold Station 12) or after he passed a pilot's test (Daedalus). This continuity error was made in the same season.

Who's to say he wasn't 12 when he passed the pilot's test??
* T'Pol had to take trellium to release her emotions she claimed in Damage, but in Stigma, she talked about how on the surface her emotions were due to Pa'naar and how she couldn't control them. One would think she could stop controlling her emotions then, rather than take trellium. This continuity error was made less than a season apart. This also doesn't take into account that she indicated when she remembered the Vulcan supression ritual in The Seventh and claimed it'd be harder to control her emotions why she wasn't a nervous wreck. The Seventh, Stigma and Damage are literally one season apart.
It was never a question about controlling them as much as exploring them. The same way college kids experiment with sex and drugs.
Since T'Pol's emotions were close to the surface, she always seemed sympathetic to those who explored those, which is why she tried to mind meld. The Panar syndrome conundrum was explained quite well in the 4th season Vulcan arc. The evolution of Vulcan behaviour from xenophobic arrogant assholes to the Vulcans we know and love by Spock's time is a journey we were going to see in the series. That was pretty obvious from day one and developed through the four year run. The Trellium allowed T'Pol tp access her emotions more readily and she experimented with the drug and it gave her some kind of emotional high she was willing to explore until she realised that she had become addicted. Having known many friends who were addicted to various things and watching them become a casualty of such, I thought T'Pol's addiction was played pretty well, for Hollywood, anyway..As far as the Seventh.. that guy was totally playing with her head because he knew that the Vulcan High Council had messed with her head and he was doing everything to get under her skin to get away scott free. That was the point of the whole episode.
* What happened to the Suliban cell ship from Communicator, and why didn't they use it in the Expanse?
It was likely left on Earth for study.
* Archer indicated he'd lived all his life in San Francisco, but claimed in season 3 (North Star) that he was born in upstate NY.
My last girlfriend was born in upstate NY and lived all her life in Hallendale, FL. You were from Boston but now live on the West coast..How's that possible?? Your life is a continuity violation by your logic!! ;)
* Trip talked about the Starfleet Training Corps in Observer Effect in season 4, but then claimed he'd never graduated from the academy in These Are the Voyages in season 4. (This one bothers me the least. I think it makes more sense if hardly anyone goes through STC back then.)
STC and SA aren't the same organization. One could go through one without the other.
* Hoshi is afraid of her own shadow in nearly every season (leading up to season 3 where she learns to grow up a little), but suddenly claims in Observer Effect she's a martial arts expert and a bad ass.
Hoshi was a white knuckle space traveller.
I hate to fly, but I am still a bad ass!!
I'm sure reasons can be made up - like my comment about Trip, but ... it's noncanon. It just seems weird to me.
Well, how can anyone even discuss this, if you consider anything they say to be "non-canon?" That's just silly and counterproductive to the discussion!!
The Bible, which I've seen, is less of a character sheet and more of a couple of bullet items per person. The writers, imo, didn't care as much about these characters and the resu lt - despite the Enterprise gang being fun and likable characters - shows. I feel sorry many times for the actors, who (as Jolene has mentioned many times) probably saw a few scripts and went, "WTF?"
The Bible isn't meant to be much more than a couple of bullet items per person. It is up to the writing team and the producers to develop the character over the run of the series. DS9 had a similar bible and the characters are barely sketched out. Additionally some of the points covered in the bible were never in the show!! I don't think the writers "didn't care." The writers tried things that served the story. Some things worked, some didn't, but after all said and done, continuity wasn't as much of an issue as a serious lack of envelope pushing inspired concepts which the series totally lacked. We come to find out much later that it was a network suit issue, more than a lack of creative drive on behalf of the producers. People would only love to blame Berman and Braga for a rainy day, but the facts of the matter say otherwise.
 
JingleBell Jarok said:
These aren't errors so much as not following up on something (or, what seemed more common, following up on it only when they felt like having an episode specifically for it).

Yup, I can agree with this. There was definitely some lazy writing on the show, but I'm not usually bothered by glitches like these, big or small. Makes me think of all the continuity glitches on M*A*S*H, which I enjoyed regardless.
 
Overall, continuity was very good. There were minor, annoying issues like Archer's father giving him flying and piloting lessons as a teenager but then we find out in Season 4 that he died when Jonathan was barely 12 or 13 and the earlier episodes seemed to indicate he lived long enough to see his son be a teen or young adult.
 
I just assumed Jonny learned to fly at an early age. He was shown to have a fascination with aircraft/spacecraft as a very young boy. If this link is correct you can get a student pilot license for a glider or balloon as young as 14. link The rules might be different in the 22nd Century.
 
actually THAT was writer's error/memory. There was a cut scene from "Home" which had Archer visiting his father's grave. The tombstone had birth/death dates on it, which indicated that Henry died when Jon was in his 20s. However, this scene was cut and Soong established in "Cold Station 12" that Henry died when Jon was about 12. But then in "Daedelus" the writers referred back to the scene in "Home", thus Erickson recalled that Henry was there when Archer passed flight school. Its just a case of a very big OOOPS on the writers part because in "Twilight" it is established firmly that Jon was 24 when he graduated flight school and that he asked Margaret Mullin to marry him (thus its highly unlikely that he was 12-14). Also in "Similitude" we see a pic of Archer from the first day of flight school and he is an adult. So basically we just have to disregard old Emory's statement.
 
I thought enterprise had pretty good continuity. Much better than previous trek series.
 
Mythyme - precisely.

Since T'Pol's emotions were close to the surface, she always seemed sympathetic to those who explored those, which is why she tried to mind meld. The Panar syndrome conundrum was explained quite well in the 4th season Vulcan arc. The evolution of Vulcan behaviour from xenophobic arrogant assholes to the Vulcans we know and love by Spock's time is a journey we were going to see in the series. That was pretty obvious from day one and developed through the four year run. The Trellium allowed T'Pol tp access her emotions more readily and she experimented with the drug and it gave her some kind of emotional high she was willing to explore until she realised that she had become addicted. Having known many friends who were addicted to various things and watching them become a casualty of such, I thought T'Pol's addiction was played pretty well, for Hollywood, anyway..As far as the Seventh.. that guy was totally playing with her head because he knew that the Vulcan High Council had messed with her head and he was doing everything to get under her skin to get away scott free. That was the point of the whole episode.

I will not be pushed filed, stamped, briefed .... Oh, you get the idea. I think you're wrong.

It's easy for her to release her emotions, thus it's easy for her to explore them. She indicated previously in too many scripts to quote them all here that her Mindf*ck (Fusion), fallora (The Seventh) and Pa'naar (Stigma) were forcing her to explore her emotions. She felt fear and heard jazz ... and even liked it.

I'll take snippets of your other posts and hope I got everything you think is relevant for context. Feel free to chastise me otherwise.

The point of this isn't, "What does __ think happened," but "they are lame because there are continuity errors that were never explained." For example, your comment about T'Pol above is fact, without really any supposition.

By the way, I really like Berman and Braga and think they receive way too many tomatoes from Trekkies.

Cell ship - It was likely left on Earth for study.

How do we know?

Archer's "I lived there all my life statement": My last girlfriend was born in upstate NY and lived all her life in Hallendale, FL. You were from Boston but now live on the West coast..How's that possible?? Your life is a continuity violation by your logic!!

Commie comment: I was born in Missouri. I never say I'm from there. I say I'm from Texas and Florida (and now Portland). In fact, people typically won't qualify with "I lived there all my life" unless they really did. More likely they would say, "I've lived there pretty much my whole life" or "almost my whole life" or "about my whole life." When you give absolutes, you mean it.

Trip's comment about being in the STC, but never having graduated: STC and SA aren't the same organization. One could go through one without the other.

Was this documented somewhere and I missed it?

Hoshi was a white knuckle space traveller.
I hate to fly, but I am still a bad ass!!

More than just that. She's a white knuckle liver -- she hates the UV suit, space travel, gets flustered when speaking with Klang .... This chick was in academia too long. Although -- I don't know b/c they never clarified it.

Maybe it's a mix of continuity errors and never following up. And I think that's a problem too.

Well, how can anyone even discuss this, if you consider anything they say to be "non-canon?" That's just silly and counterproductive to the discussion!!

I like your double exclamation points!!! (I raised you one!) The point of this discussion - at least my thinking isn't - "Make up a reason for continuity errors." Although, I think that would be an interesting new thread. I have a few. This discussion is more -- how come there are some and did it bother you? Or - use what happened to show Commie she's wrong. Your comment about T'Pol, in my mind, was very much of that nature.

Fact: Archer has brown hair.
Fact: Archer has green eyes.
Opinion: He probably got those traits from his mom. (We don't know -- we've never seen her.)

Facts is how I "roll." That doesn't mean to say you can't continue arguing your opinion. GalleryWest would come down on my like a load of bricks if I said otherwise. And your opinion is welcome.

The Bible isn't meant to be much more than a couple of bullet items per person. It is up to the writing team and the producers to develop the character over the run of the series. DS9 had a similar bible and the characters are barely sketched out. Additionally some of the points covered in the bible were never in the show!! I don't think the writers "didn't care." The writers tried things that served the story. Some things worked, some didn't, but after all said and done, continuity wasn't as much of an issue as a serious lack of envelope pushing inspired concepts which the series totally lacked. We come to find out much later that it was a network suit issue, more than a lack of creative drive on behalf of the producers. People would only love to blame Berman and Braga for a rainy day, but the facts of the matter say otherwise.

Yes. My point is -- I don't think they knew their own characters. And Braga's latest interview kinda underscores that to me. He and Berma indicate they were rushed into Enterprise. Too bad.
 
commodore64 said:
She indicated previously in too many scripts to quote them all here that her Mindf*ck (Fusion), fallora (The Seventh) and Pa'naar (Stigma) were forcing her to explore her emotions. She felt fear and heard jazz ... and even liked it.
T'Pol heard and liked jazz long before contracting Pa'naar Syndrome. I suspect that if examined closely, a fair number of what you think are continuity errors might turn out to be just little memory glitches.

As for following up on stories; some ideas were simply dropped, I suspect, because either they weren't working, or the writers were bored with them, or because they had other stories and ideas they considered more important. As has been pointed out numerous times, there wasn't much time, so the writers picked out what they considered the most important established storylines and continued (followed up on) them, while introducing the new stuff.

Its not that complicated.
 
gblews said:
As has been pointed out numerous times, there wasn't much time, so the writers picked out what they considered the most important established storylines and continued (followed up on) them, while introducing the new stuff.
And yet somehow ``Marauders'' made the cut.
 
commodore64 said:


* Hoshi is afraid of her own shadow in nearly every season (leading up to season 3 where she learns to grow up a little), but suddenly claims in Observer Effect she's a martial arts expert and a bad ass.

Because somebody thought she wasn't enough of an Asian stereotype, even if she was already a bookish near-genius. Had the show continued it would've been revealed that she's into origami, she's a bad driver and has a small penis.

Also Soong only think Archer's father passed away when he was 12. Starfleet faked the senior Archer's death so he could work on the warp 5 program in secret without Vulcan interference.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top