I'll never get over that lame 'Captain Killy" thing.
What's so strange? They're basically equal rank in the sense that Michael was stripped of rank and Tilly hadn't yet earned one.
Tell it to Star Trek: Phase II ?It's been greenlit, episodes are written and Michelle Yeoh is signed on to do it. Barring something like everyone suddenly stops watching Disco altogether and no one watches the Picard show at all, the Section 31 show will make it to air.
Barely begun? She had already served six months in prison. Granted, it was a life sentence, but six months in prison is hardly "barely begun." Regardless, she was on work release, and was therefore a functioning member of the crew, just one without rank, so being roomed with a cadet seems proper rooming protocol. Also take into account Lorca was trying to assemble a team of Prime Universe counterparts of people he knew in the Mirror Universe, and maybe it gave him amusement to assign two people who were ruthless Captains in the Mirror Universe to the same low-ranking accommodations?I don’t know how it’s not strange. She’s a TRAITOR barely begun her sentence and Tilly’s a cadet barely out of childhood. It’s a wonder Burnham wasn’t assigned to a broom closet, with an ankle monitor at all times.
Apples and oranges. There's currently two Star Trek shows in production and the Section 31 show is one of three additional shows confirmed to be in development, with Section 31 being the one furthest along with episodes written, lead cast and a set already built. There's absolutely no reason to expect this show won't make it to air unless Disco's popularity does a dramatic 180.Tell it to Star Trek: Phase II ?
One thing I'm glad about is know we won't have to hear anyone wondering if Kirk and Spock were working for Section 31 in "The Enterprise Incident" anymore.
I can't see Spock ever willingly doing a thing for them.
Key word is willingly. Section 31 could still be behind it, just Kirk and Spock wouldn't know that. The way it played out in the novels, the order came down from Admiral Cartwright, who was himself working on Section 31's behalf.I can't see Spock ever willingly doing a thing for them.
Key word is willingly. Section 31 could still be behind it, just Kirk and Spock wouldn't know that. The way it played out in the novels, the order came down from Admiral Cartwright, who was himself working on Section 31's behalf.
Barely begun? She had already served six months in prison. Granted, it was a life sentence, but...
Regardless, she was on work release, and was therefore a functioning member of the crew, just one without rank, so being roomed with a cadet seems proper rooming protocol.
There's currently two Star Trek shows in production and the Section 31 show is one of three additional shows confirmed to be in development,
with Section 31 being the one furthest along with episodes written, lead cast and a set already built.
There's absolutely no reason to expect this show won't make it to air unless Disco's popularity does a dramatic 180.
Michael wasn't officially blamed for starting the war. It's true, many believed she did anyway, but even Admiral Cornwell said that was an unjustifiable claim.But nothing? 6 months is barely begun when you’re in for life, for a war going on all around them – one heading toward genocide of Earth.
The only one on the ship who had such an opinion of Michael was Landry, and look where that got her.Why not kill Tilly in her sleep, steal a shuttle, and run? We know we can trust Burnham (mostly), but to them, she's a traitor in for life.
This has nothing to do with being a fan, it's simply the facts. Despite the hiccups with Disco in the early days (most of which seem to be because of Fuller dicking around) CBS seems to have its shit in the sock when it comes to their current crop of Star Trek shows. If there's a chance of any not making it to air, it would be the two animated shows or Nick Meyer's Ceti Alpha V miniseries. The Section 31 show I feel is a safe bet at the moment.I get it; you're a fan. I am too (of DSC more than 31) but there's lots of reasons a TV show might not make it to air, and many countless ones don't
Commander is a high enough rank to warrant private quarters. Regardless, protocol dictates that a person's roommate be someone of equal rank exactly to avoid situations where a person would try to pull rank on their roommate.Some people might not like the reasoning, but why would their quarters be re-assigned? What would be the reason. Normally a request for a change of quarters comes from one of the occupants, unless there's a lack of space for visiting diplomats or some such temporary emergency.
Is that Starfleet protocol or real world military protocol? Because it seems Starfleet is more lax. I remember Lt. Cmdr Valtane being roommates with Ensign Tuvok on the Excelsior, as revealed on Voyager.Commander is a high enough rank to warrant private quarters. Regardless, protocol dictates that a person's roommate be someone of equal rank exactly to avoid situations where a person would try to pull rank on their roommate.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.