Given Lucas never fully planned stuff out (AOTC being an extremely famous example) I imagine Kennedy thought she could do the same.
Lucas already challenged that template and the Mythology when he did "I am your father". It was never that straightforward.
So stagnate, very good.
They would have, if they'd had anything to work with for Post-ROTJ...but they didn't.
Finn and Poe were never meant to be more than Plot Devices to get Rey involved in the plot, neither of them were even supposed to survive TFA to begin with. The plot of the Sequels was always going to revolve around Rey and Ren.
Honestly, the First Order bothers me the least of the ST things. I see it as a foreign power that people didn't know about due to being out in the Unknown Regions/Uncharted Territories. I really liked the TLJ Visual Dictionary had a much more interesting in Snoke's origins, and I think that would have been more interesting to explore.
Yes, but the negative reactions started already after the first two episodes, right?
Freedom is only one generation from extinction.First Order didn't bother me. Because, as we've found out in the real world, Nazi's never die.
I'm glad to see someone else recognize this, it's been driving me crazy since The Force Awakens came out. Personally, I've had no problems with what's been happening in the franchise under her leadership, but I could see where people who are unhappy could argue she could be hiring better people. But it's ridiculous to blame her personally for creative decisions, since she had nothing to do with them.Kathleen Kennedy isn't even involved in the creative side of Star Wars, she strictly handles the business side, so I fail to see why we're always laying blame for the story related issues in the franchise with her.
I don't know if I want to drive traffic to Collider, but they have an article that's been making the rounds:
Star Wars' Biggest Problem Is the Fans
I'd say the biggest problem is how risk adverse studios have become (not just Disney). So we just get the greatest hits over and over again.
Someone needs to explain to "toxic fans": It used to be, if people didn't like a show for whatever reason, they stopped watching it. Now they "hate watch" it and kvetch about it on the internet. Hollywood doesn't care why you watch something, only that you do. If you don't like a show, don't watch it and stop talking about it. Promote what you like, not what you don't.
Do they really watch it though? It seems to me people start complaining and review bombing before the product even comes out, or much too quickly after it comes out to have watched. I think it is more like the Project 2025 group that immediately reacts to inappropriate content without ever bothering to examine the actual content.
A more recent example of people not being familiar with what they're complaining about is The Handmaid's Tale, both book and series. I used to frequent a bunch of review channels on YT, and finally quit the ones run by women. They basically turned into screechfests and complaining about "How DARE anyone write a book or make a TV show about white women suffering or being enslaved, and EVERY character who dies is black!!!!"
...
They were convinced that the show was about Trump, and wouldn't listen to those of us who pointed out that the book had been published in 1985, the author was Canadian, and who in Canada knew or gave a nanosecond's worth of a damn about Trump in 1985?
I think it's legitimate to take a position that, based on a trailer or review, that you don't have an interest in something, or think it sounds like a bad idea, but otherwise generally agree.My own view is that if you're going to criticize something, you should have at least tried to read or watch it, or be able to cite what it is that you're criticizing if you're going by previews and trailers. Don't just say you hate something because someone else said it was bad.
The book made it very clear that the Sons of Jacob only wanted white people in the Republic of Gilead. Everyone else was either deported or shipped off to prison camps in the middle of nowhere.
I think it's legitimate to take a position that, based on a trailer or review, that you don't have an interest in something, or think it sounds like a bad idea, but otherwise generally agree.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.