This thread isn't an accusation or a browbeating or a harangue, but an honest question. And, if you'd rather skip my explanation and just start answering the question, feel free:
Why don't you listen to audio Trek?
It's a well-known fact that audio
Trek series get less "viewership" (usually
exponentially less) than a video
Trek series. This appears to be true across the board.
Some of that's not surprising. Obviously,
Phase II, which is the 200-ton gorilla of
Trek fan films (and more power to ya,
jamesmc -- you rock!), gets literally
millions more downloads than teeny little
Star Trek: Eras running irregularly on TWERP Radio, and
Hidden Frontier, which has been around for nine years and built a violently passionate fan base, is going to obviously bring with it a certain cachet that newbie
Star Trek: Outpost, now in its first year at Giant Gnome, does not.
But we see the stark difference in places I wouldn't expect, too: brand-spanking-new shows like
Star Trek: Osiris trounce the download counts of
Lost Frontier, which (counting its predecessor,
Section 31)has been around
forever. Video shows with irregular update schedules (no offense,
Exeter) generate constant queries throughout the fanboards from
hundreds of people for
years after deadlines are missed, whereas, over at my own
Star Trek: Excelsior (shameless plug:
www.starshipexcelsior.com), we have basically a total of two vocal fans who try (but fail) to keep our deadlines honest. Very few shows release hard download numbers (which is a shame), so it's hard to say for certain, but I've heard from a few people that
Federation One saw its numbers crash when it moved from video to audio. Above all, the fan preference for video over audio appears to be
irrespective of acting, writing, or technical quality -- as the case of
Federation One, which was consistent in all things but transmission format, shows most clearly.
As an audio producer myself, I would obviously love it if more people listened to audio
Trek. Moreover, I've found that most (not all) of my favorite fan works are audio shows, mainly thanks to some delightful audio writers and the built-in ability to tell longer, more intricate stories because of the faster production schedule. But, like I said at the top, this isn't a harangue or an exhortation for you to drop what you're doing and listen to the several thousand minutes' worth of available audio-format
Star Trek that's out there right now. I really just want to know what it is that attracts so many people to the video format so exclusively, and if perhaps there's something audio productions can do to interest those fans more in the audio world.
As a (hopefully unnecessary) disclaimer, I'll note that I harbor no resentment toward the video shows whatsoever -- they have a
much harder job than we do, they put a
ton of work into their shows, and, heck, they actually spend
money on this stuff. We on
Excelsior pay $50 a year for the webserver and the rest is
gratis. A single episode of
Intrepid is thousands of pounds sterling. The time, dedication, and production genius of fan-video teams is astounding, and, speaking generally, their products are damn good, too.
However--again, speaking generally--the product of the fan-audio teams is
also damn good, and yet we see much lower download counts and general interest. So, from a die-hard audio fan to a video-centered community: what is it about video? Is it anything that we in audio can emulate?
I appreciate your answers.