(BTW...I'd say my quote would be a most interesting sig for ya. You have my permission if you like--just use my standard name, Rush Limborg.)

Now, now. Let's not rush anything here.

(BTW...I'd say my quote would be a most interesting sig for ya. You have my permission if you like--just use my standard name, Rush Limborg.)
Britain? Surely you jest.
(BTW...I'd say my quote would be a most interesting sig for ya. You have my permission if you like--just use my standard name, Rush Limborg.)
Now, now. Let's not rush anything here.
![]()
Seeing as the conversation here has cooled down quite a bit since my last post, forgive me for changing my mind but I'd like to throw in two more cents. Or at least emphasize my previous two cents.
What you all need to realize...or, more accurately, recall, since I'm sure you already know, is this: 'beauty', 'attractiveness', and 'likability' are all qualities that are in the eye of the beholder. They are OPINIONS, not facts. So you can't tell someone they're wrong about a person's beauty, or say that someone is 'definitely' more attractive than someone else. It's a personal, subjective opinion.
Now as for the more interesting discussion about equality...a lot of you have made some excellent points. While I may not agree with the SEVERITY of your opinions about Jadzia (for those of you, like my friend Rushbo, who don't like her attitude towards men), I can see the basis of those qualities in her. I see where you're coming from.
I saw an interesting t-shirt the other day...it said "Never fight fire with fire. Nobody can handle two fires." While it's a funny slogan, it's true in regards to things like sexism and chauvinism. It's not right for someone who has been a victim of racism by individuals of a certain race to then be racist towards all members of that race, and the same goes for chauvinists and sexists. Sexism and racism go both ways, and tolerance needs to go both ways as well. Although in my humble opinion, 'tolerance' is a weak, overused word. Tolerating someone doesn't mean you like them or accept them, just that you don't show your displeasure with them.
In short...can't we ALL just get along?
Seeing as the conversation here has cooled down quite a bit since my last post, forgive me for changing my mind but I'd like to throw in two more cents. Or at least emphasize my previous two cents.
What you all need to realize...or, more accurately, recall, since I'm sure you already know, is this: 'beauty', 'attractiveness', and 'likability' are all qualities that are in the eye of the beholder. They are OPINIONS, not facts. So you can't tell someone they're wrong about a person's beauty, or say that someone is 'definitely' more attractive than someone else. It's a personal, subjective opinion.
Now as for the more interesting discussion about equality...a lot of you have made some excellent points. While I may not agree with the SEVERITY of your opinions about Jadzia (for those of you, like my friend Rushbo, who don't like her attitude towards men), I can see the basis of those qualities in her. I see where you're coming from.
I saw an interesting t-shirt the other day...it said "Never fight fire with fire. Nobody can handle two fires." While it's a funny slogan, it's true in regards to things like sexism and chauvinism. It's not right for someone who has been a victim of racism by individuals of a certain race to then be racist towards all members of that race, and the same goes for chauvinists and sexists. Sexism and racism go both ways, and tolerance needs to go both ways as well. Although in my humble opinion, 'tolerance' is a weak, overused word. Tolerating someone doesn't mean you like them or accept them, just that you don't show your displeasure with them.
In short...can't we ALL just get along?
+1
Quoted for truth. Couldn't have said it better myself.
On a sidenote while while on the subject of sex and t'shirts. I just got myself a t'shirt that says "I don't need sex. The government fucks me every day." You wouldn't believe the looks i got when passing by the parliament today.
But hey--it's what happens when you put an Italian and a lad with an Irish background in the ring....![]()
First of all, I must thank CindyLouWho in her mod's hat for her support (not necessarily of my position, but of my style of posting). I bow to wisdom, since I have no intention of causing any ruckus in this thread. At the same time, it was a little unsettling being dubbed IT and talked about like a children-eating monster...![]()
I concede I might be seeing motives in your way of address that aren't present in your mind, even if I consider it mighty coincidental that you start with the over-formal style any time you disagree with someone. It's really a basic rhetorical trick to put the opposing side of the debate at a disadvantage. Now, I have no problem with using rhetoric in a debate (not surprisingly, I guess), but claiming innocence in its use strikes me as disingenuously naive. Still, as I said, I'm not in your head, so I'll take your words at face value.
I've long disliked Ezri as well, my friend. You are not alone. The lack of appreciation and love for Jadzia has always been startling to me. She's one of my favorites, and clearly the most attractive woman ever in Trek. The "faults" people state about her character are exactly what I like about her. She was a great balance of many traits. She wasn't too diminutive or superfluous like Uhura, Crusher or Troi. She wasn't too much of a hard-ass like Kira (whom I like, mind you). She wasn't cold like Seven. She wasn't whatever Janeway was (whom I also like; but no where near as much as Jadzia). She wasn't over-the-top like B'Elanna. Wasn't a jerk like T'Pol. Wasn't a flake and a whiner like Hoshi. Wasn't a useless nut like Ezri.
She was Jadzia. Strong, but sensual. Wicked sense of humor. Not afraid to show emotion, but didn't wear it on her sleave. Comfortable with who she was on near every level. Confident, unique, mischevious...
Sigh.
Jadzia is my singular favorite female character in all of Trek, and she is deeply missed.
Want to know what really sucks? In the Trek novels, some idiot had the brilliant idea to make Ezri Dax a STARSHIP CAPTAIN within 5 YEARS of DS9's end!
...*Disgust*
However, just to strike the difference between cultures, around here in Italy I'm the Vulcan: cold-blooded, composed, reserved, and stoic. So that you know if you would ever plan a visit to Rome or Venice.![]()
^Mamma Mia.
If you're a Vulcan in Italy--I am NOT going there any time soon!
Nope. Britain for me.
(I know--Italy's food is infinitely superior, as anyone knows...but I'd say it'd be worth the sacrifice. Maybe Switzerland....)
Because I am not given in to the Tellarite concept of "fun". And you, iguana, are a Tellarite.![]()
I saw an interesting t-shirt the other day...it said "Never fight fire with fire. Nobody can handle two fires." While it's a funny slogan, it's true in regards to things like sexism and chauvinism. It's not right for someone who has been a victim of racism by individuals of a certain race to then be racist towards all members of that race, and the same goes for chauvinists and sexists. Sexism and racism go both ways, and tolerance needs to go both ways as well. Although in my humble opinion, 'tolerance' is a weak, overused word. Tolerating someone doesn't mean you like them or accept them, just that you don't show your displeasure with them.
In short...can't we ALL just get along?
I concede I might be seeing motives in your way of address that aren't present in your mind, even if I consider it mighty coincidental that you start with the over-formal style any time you disagree with someone. It's really a basic rhetorical trick to put the opposing side of the debate at a disadvantage. Now, I have no problem with using rhetoric in a debate (not surprisingly, I guess), but claiming innocence in its use strikes me as disingenuously naive. Still, as I said, I'm not in your head, so I'll take your words at face value.
In honesty, IT, I don't think he was using words like 'sir' to be a jerk. I know what you are saying about how some people use formalities to manipulate the discussion, but I am inclined to believe that this sort of manipulation was not St. William's intent in this instance. The requisite level of sarcasm wasn't present, it didn't seem like to me.
Of course, guys, this is a completely subjective judgment call on my part...
....but for the time being that is my feeling.
And I just KNOW that St. William will not prove me to have been in error in that assessment.![]()
![]()
I saw an interesting t-shirt the other day...it said "Never fight fire with fire. Nobody can handle two fires." While it's a funny slogan, it's true in regards to things like sexism and chauvinism. It's not right for someone who has been a victim of racism by individuals of a certain race to then be racist towards all members of that race, and the same goes for chauvinists and sexists. Sexism and racism go both ways, and tolerance needs to go both ways as well. Although in my humble opinion, 'tolerance' is a weak, overused word. Tolerating someone doesn't mean you like them or accept them, just that you don't show your displeasure with them.
In short...can't we ALL just get along?
VERY well said. Racism is racism, sexism is sexism...there is no such thing as "reverse" racism or sexism. It's wrong and degrading to the soul of whoever does it, as well as the effect it has on the victim of the moment.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.