I am not sure. But I am sure that this can and will affect non - Vulcans.
Much of the modern view of the Federation comes from how Picard describes it in TNG and, as I've pointed out before, Picard is quite often full of shit on that kind of stuff. He is rather elitist and likes to speechify on why the Federation is so much better than everyone else.Here's the thing: the idea that the Federation is literally one, big, giant, centralized "utopia," as opposed to an alliance of civilized worlds sharing certain common values and interests, is a very modern one, that bears little or no resemblance to the way things were depicted on the Original Series. Indeed, TOS often portrayed the Federation as a very loose consortium of worlds who often had very little in common -- and whose members didn't always get along. (See "Journey to Babel.")
If anything, it seemed more like the United Nations than one single unified government.
The way I see it, the Federation (and Starfleet) is an organization driven by "utopian" ideals, not literally a utopia.
And, as is alway the case, reality doesn't always live up to a culture's highest ideals.
Hence, the drama and paradoxes of the human condition.
Is Vulcan a utopia?Seems so. But it also seems to go a bit against this "utopia" thing. Which is impossible anyway, it should be "we do our best" thing (which is more as it was in TOS anyway).
It always bothered me a little how the Federation was quite passive when it came to certain things. Especially what they were willing to ignore. It's pretty clear that the Federation values free will a lot. And they want their citizens to be happy. But they seem to be letting Vulcans do things that may be seen as oppressive. Like their arranged marriages.
I'd say the Federation definitely did not share a common military in TOS. After all, in Journey to Babel it's stated that there are Federation worlds on the verge of going to war with other Federation worlds. That'd be a bit tricky if they all shared a common military.In TOS the Federation was more like the UN or EU - a union of independent nation-states with a common military and currency.
Yeah, "Journey to Babel" doesn't work with the TNG conception of the Federation.I'd say the Federation definitely did not share a common military in TOS. After all, in Journey to Babel it's stated that there are Federation worlds on the verge of going to war with other Federation worlds. That'd be a bit tricky if they all shared a common military.
The intent in TOS was Starfleet was strictly an Earth organization.
No where is it stipulated that individual Vulcans are forced to participate.
I'd say the Federation definitely did not share a common military in TOS. After all, in Journey to Babel it's stated that there are Federation worlds on the verge of going to war with other Federation worlds. That'd be a bit tricky if they all shared a common military.
The intent in TOS was Starfleet was strictly an Earth organization.
![]()
Not all traditions are evil or bad.
Yeah, "Journey to Babel" doesn't work with the TNG conception of the Federation.
Sarek's family strikes me as a bit of an outlier. In "Yesteryear" (TAS), Spock impersonates a cousin who states he is going on a journey to honor the gods at the family shrine.Along the lines of this thought and going back to the subject of arranged marriage, was it ever stated that was a Vulcan norm? Maybe this is unique to some philosophy that Sarek's family follows? Maybe this is not some planet wide one size fits all tradition.
In the first place, the Prime Directive. It's not for anyone else to tell the Vulcans what is and is not acceptable, unless it goes against the Federation Charter. Like caste based discrimination, as stated in DS9's "ACCESSION".It always bothered me a little how the Federation was quite passive when it came to certain things. Especially what they were willing to ignore. It's pretty clear that the Federation values free will a lot. And they want their citizens to be happy. But they seem to be letting Vulcans do things that may be seen as oppressive. Like their arranged marriages. They certainly put a lot of pressure on children to go through with it. The only way out seems to be pretty brutal and even then, it is still discouraged. Also, there is the fact that they think all Vuclans should control their emotions and claim it would be catastrophic and these Vulcans would hurt others and themselves. But, for all their faults, Romulans seem to have a functioning society. I think Vulcans could do without arranged marriages. And they have huge potential for generating problems. Why does the Federation allow that?
I'd say the Federation definitely did not share a common military in TOS. After all, in Journey to Babel it's stated that there are Federation worlds on the verge of going to war with other Federation worlds. That'd be a bit tricky if they all shared a common military
In TOS the Federation was more like the UN or EU - a union of independent nation-states with a common military and currency. Each political entity sent ambassadors to other Federation member worlds.
In TNG the Federation is more like the United States. One dominant federal government overseeing semi or quasi independent states that, ultimately, are subordinate to the centralized government.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.