Ok, having slightly raised an eyebrow at this, I'd like you to explain to me how revealing any more potentially revealing information to a total stranger with whom my interactions thus far have been antagonistic would in any way help this thread. This question becomes even more cogent when placed in the context of the actual thrust of my argument that exactly such presenting of real world credentials is by and large a meaningless exercise on a discussion board where one is based on the quality of their local input.
There are, in fact, several people in these forums who are verifiably aware of my real world identity (and vica versa) but that level of disclosure is in each case based on trust established over time and repeated interactions. I have several reasons not to wish that information publicly shared. If you can make a convincing case that this would be constructive beyond some anatomical measuring contest I will consider sharing more information about the nature of my work in private but please note I will not humour any attempts to personally identify me, I simply don't know you anywhere near well enough.
It was never about measuring anything, if you're going to insinuate I am espousing falsehoods, then I'd like the opportunity to provide my credentials, and since you mentioned yours, it was incumbent upon me to take that and examine if your credentials were also real. If so, we could then dispell charges of lying, and continue with our debate. However, as you said your conversations with me are antagonistic. I suppose there's no real reason except the one above that would warrant such reveals of each other. To your point, it doesn't matter to what we are discussing in this forum.
Our main disagreement is that of human nature. Role models and the scientific studies that support hypothesises of how boys and girls react to gender models on Tv.
My supposition is there is a natural draw to want to see yourself in a role model similar to ones self and as a child growing up, the figures and role models you are attracted to are part of the process developing the ego, and role as a person.
As for my intelligence comment, in the context above, I was relating what was a motivator in the choices of protagonist I sought as a child. Not playing a victim as has been said. So, it is nice to see ones words not be twisted against one's self.
But that's not what this forum is about..
I see why it's difficult to get a word in dissent without mob tactics being employed to those who don't think like the PC police. it's definitely ideology over rational debate, and that's unfortunate.
If your credentials are as you say. Then you of all people should know and see the difference, whether you agree with a poster or not.