^Well, they did reveal themselves to Bashir. Although...Sloan noted he was confident that, "In time, you'll come to agree with me."
Are you people going to just completely ignore Sci's point that, their criminality aside, Section 31 is just blatantly incompetent and would have cost thousands more Federation lives if their little genocide trick succeeded?
How is it incompetent to decapitate the enemy's leadership, especially when they are all genocidal assholes? Sure, the morphogenic virus wouldn't kill them all quickly and there would be higher Federation casualties in the near term, but in the long term, it would've removed the Dominion as a major threat. Odo managing to get the Female Changeling to stand down was a fluke, given how the Founders ignored all of his experiences when they linked with him at the end of season 4.Are you people going to just completely ignore Sci's point that, their criminality aside, Section 31 is just blatantly incompetent and would have cost thousands more Federation lives if their little genocide trick succeeded?
Are you people going to just completely ignore Sci's point that, their criminality aside, Section 31 is just blatantly incompetent and would have cost thousands more Federation lives if their little genocide trick succeeded?
How is it incompetent to decapitate the enemy's leadership, especially when they are all genocidal assholes?
Sure, the morphogenic virus wouldn't kill them all quickly and there would be higher Federation casualties in the near term, but in the long term, it would've removed the Dominion as a major threat.
Are you people going to just completely ignore Sci's point that, their criminality aside, Section 31 is just blatantly incompetent and would have cost thousands more Federation lives if their little genocide trick succeeded?
Factually wrong as the Dominion wants to dominate solids, not eradicate them.
But they are not all genocidal assholes. It is a canonical fact that there are infant Founders; are you saying it's okay to kill children now? And we don't know enough about the internal politics of the Great Link to know that every adult Founder agrees with Dominion policy.
Don't be absurd. It just would have destabilized the Dominion, with either factions of Vorta claiming the mantle of Dominion leadership for themselves, or the Jem'Hadar being loosed on the galaxy with no one left to control them.
It's really hard to project how the Dominion would fare if the Founders died, because we've seen Vorta show little patience for the Jem'Hadar's schtick and a willingness to kill them all, along with Jem'Hadar willing to disobey the Founders on their own initiative in addition to the suicides in response to a Founder's death. For all we know, killing the Founders would've caused a Dominion civil war as any surviving loyal Jem'Hadar dealt with less loyal Jem'Hadar before being killed by the Vorta poisoning the White supplies.Okay...let's recap:Don't be absurd. It just would have destabilized the Dominion, with either factions of Vorta claiming the mantle of Dominion leadership for themselves, or the Jem'Hadar being loosed on the galaxy with no one left to control them.
First, the Jem'Hadar are addicted to the White. They literally can't survive without it. The Vorta oversee the production.
Second (and more importantly), I refer you--and all others using the argument of their being "turned loose"--to "The Ship". Recall how it ended: When the Founder died, the Jem'Hadar crew charged with defending him/her committed suicide. Is is absurd to hold that the Jem'Hadar en masse would probably do the same, were the Founders to die?
Yeah, that's why the Dominion is a Founders only club, that's why kill all the solids in the Gamma quadrant.For the simple reason that there are far too many of them in the universe to eradicate. But as the build-up episodes (the episode with the holographic villiage comes to mind), as well as episodes like "The Quickening", make clear, they are not above genocide as a tactic. They have no qualms about such things--they are only "solids", after all. If they could, they would.
But they are not all genocidal assholes. It is a canonical fact that there are infant Founders; are you saying it's okay to kill children now? And we don't know enough about the internal politics of the Great Link to know that every adult Founder agrees with Dominion policy.
The implication is--there is a groupthink in the Link, as far as the solids are concerned--not genetic (Odo, of course, disagrees), but as a culture. This groupthink is absolute in the Link--otherwise, we'd have seen defectors on the Founder end, not just the Vorta end (a la "Treachery, Faith...").
Second (and more importantly), I refer you--and all others using the argument of their being "turned loose"--to "The Ship". Recall how it ended: When the Founder died, the Jem'Hadar crew charged with defending him/her committed suicide. Is is absurd to hold that the Jem'Hadar en masse would probably do the same, were the Founders to die?
For the simple reason that there are far too many of them in the universe to eradicate. But as the build-up episodes (the episode with the holographic villiage comes to mind), as well as episodes like "The Quickening", make clear, they are not above genocide as a tactic. They have no qualms about such things--they are only "solids", after all. If they could, they would.
Yeah, that's why the Dominion is a Founders only club, that's why kill all the solids in the Gamma quadrant.
Propaganda about the enemy being oh-so-wicked. More fascist shit coming up the toilet. When do we reach the part where the Founders or the Vietnamese eat little babies?
...but in the long term, it would've removed the Dominion as a major threat.
This groupthink is absolute in the Link--otherwise, we'd have seen defectors on the Founder end, not just the Vorta end (a la "Treachery, Faith...").
First, the Jem'Hadar are addicted to the White. They literally can't survive without it. The Vorta oversee the production.
Is is absurd to hold that the Jem'Hadar en masse would probably do the same, were the Founders to die?
The reason why the Jem'Hadar soldiers in "The Ship" killed themselves is because they failed - they were the personal guard assigned to save that Founder, and they didn't do it. The Founder died because they didn't do their jobs to protect it. That's why they committed suicide.
If the entire Founder race died, we don't know what the Jem'Hadar would do.
This groupthink is absolute in the Link--otherwise, we'd have seen defectors on the Founder end, not just the Vorta end (a la "Treachery, Faith...").
What do you base this on? The only Founder we ever saw aside from Odo and Laas was "the female Changeling" - there may well have been other founders arguing within the Link we never met. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
...but in the long term, it would've removed the Dominion as a major threat.
There's absolutely no way of knowing that.
First, the Jem'Hadar are addicted to the White. They literally can't survive without it. The Vorta oversee the production.
The Jem'Hadar aren't stupid - and the only thing keeping them dependent on the Vorta is the Founders' commands.
The reason why the Jem'Hadar soldiers in "The Ship" killed themselves is because they failed - they were the personal guard assigned to save that Founder, and they didn't do it. The Founder died because they didn't do their jobs to protect it. That's why they committed suicide.
If the entire Founder race died, we don't know what the Jem'Hadar would do.
The Jem'Hadar are charged with serving the Founders--and that includes defending them. The en masse death of the Founders would mean the greatest failure of all, for them--failing to protect the Founders from death. Hence...mass suicide.
The reason why the Jem'Hadar soldiers in "The Ship" killed themselves is because they failed - they were the personal guard assigned to save that Founder, and they didn't do it. The Founder died because they didn't do their jobs to protect it. That's why they committed suicide.
If the entire Founder race died, we don't know what the Jem'Hadar would do.
The Jem'Hadar are charged with serving the Founders--and that includes defending them. The en masse death of the Founders would mean the greatest failure of all, for them--failing to protect the Founders from death. Hence...mass suicide.
Plenty of cultures in real life have venerated their emperors and other rules as living gods. Guess what? The Romans didn't commit mass suicide when the last Roman Emperor was toppled.
The Japanese did not commit mass suicide when Hirohito renounced the idea of imperial divinity. Mass suicide does not usually follow when the emperor turns out to be naked.
I see no reason to think that all, or even most, Jem'Hadar are going to react in the exact same way a handful of them did, once. Jem'Hadar are people, not machines; you can't stereotype them like that.
This groupthink is absolute in the Link--otherwise, we'd have seen defectors on the Founder end, not just the Vorta end (a la "Treachery, Faith...").
What do you base this on? The only Founder we ever saw aside from Odo and Laas was "the female Changeling" - there may well have been other founders arguing within the Link we never met. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
Except a defector from the Link would be, for all intents and purposes, one of the grestest turmning points in the entire War
But here's something I find amusing, regarding the argument of the other side:
They say wiping the Founders out would've angered the Jem'Hadar and caused them to launch a full-scale war.
Here's the difference, though: were the other side driven to all-encompassing rage--blinding them to all other concerns
And what of the White? Even if the Vorta weren't to poison the White, and were the Jem'Hadar to rebel against them, etc.--that means there is no way to replicate the White, which means the Jem'Hadar eventually en masse fall into withdrawl,
What do you base this on? The only Founder we ever saw aside from Odo and Laas was "the female Changeling" - there may well have been other founders arguing within the Link we never met. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
Except a defector from the Link would be, for all intents and purposes, one of the grestest turmning points in the entire War
Kestral's point is not that there was a defector, but that there's no evidence that all Founders think alike and support genocidal policies. We have no idea what kinds of decision-making mechanisms occur within the Link, or whether or not there may be some form of dissidence.
And if not all Founders think alike, that hurts the idea that they all deserve death.
No. We've said that it would leave the Jem'Hadar in chaos, loosing them on their galactic neighbors with no stabilizing force.
Who said that was the inevitable reaction of the Jem'Hadar? I would be as concerned at the thought of ambitious Jem'Hadar Firsts setting himself up local warlords, with no Vorta around to curb their tendencies towards extreme violent repression of the peoples they rule (thereby further spreading long-term instability in the Gamma Quadrant).
And what of the White? Even if the Vorta weren't to poison the White, and were the Jem'Hadar to rebel against them, etc.--that means there is no way to replicate the White, which means the Jem'Hadar eventually en masse fall into withdrawl,
Right, 'cos it's not like there's any possibility of rebellious Jem'Hadar maybe figuring out how to create White by themselves or anything.![]()
Except a defector from the Link would be, for all intents and purposes, one of the grestest turmning points in the entire War
Kestral's point is not that there was a defector, but that there's no evidence that all Founders think alike and support genocidal policies. We have no idea what kinds of decision-making mechanisms occur within the Link, or whether or not there may be some form of dissidence.
And if not all Founders think alike, that hurts the idea that they all deserve death.
If those "non-genocide" Founders do not try to put a stop to those policies--knowing full well what is going on--than their guilt is even greater than those that support those policies. Why? Because they "know" that their bretheren are committing atrocities--and are doing nothing to stop it.
And their lack of stabilization would not be an advantage to them--at all. Just the opposite. Without rationality, there is no rational planning.No. We've said that it would leave the Jem'Hadar in chaos, loosing them on their galactic neighbors with no stabilizing force.
Who said that was the inevitable reaction of the Jem'Hadar? I would be as concerned at the thought of ambitious Jem'Hadar Firsts setting himself up local warlords, with no Vorta around to curb their tendencies towards extreme violent repression of the peoples they rule (thereby further spreading long-term instability in the Gamma Quadrant).
I thought the "idea" was that their agenda would be to avenge those who killed off the Founders?
And what of the White? Even if the Vorta weren't to poison the White, and were the Jem'Hadar to rebel against them, etc.--that means there is no way to replicate the White, which means the Jem'Hadar eventually en masse fall into withdrawl,
Right, 'cos it's not like there's any possibility of rebellious Jem'Hadar maybe figuring out how to create White by themselves or anything.![]()
And...how would you think them capable of such things? Need I remind you of their programming?
Need I remind you of the episode with the young Jem'Hadar, programmed to be violent, with a need to destroy--and no desire to create?
In fact--a civil war between the Jem'Hadar and the Vorta would work to the Allies' advantage. "A house divided against itself cannot stand."
Drugged and programmed clones, free will thereby drugged and programmed out of them. As the Jem'Hadar First in "Hippocratic Oath" found out the hard way, he was the tragic exception, not the rule.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.