I am going to cosign everything Marynator has said. She is obviously well read and well researched on this topic.
She's certainly read a lot of feminist blogs. But she's also been mega-judgmental and accusatory in this thread, to the point that last night I had to get up and walk off some of the anger I was feeling before I could read further or even begin to compose the replies that I did post... which were a lot more restrained than I would have posted elsewhere.
As a white woman that is also a mother to two littles, I hear the mantra about self care often. I read this article a few months back, which linked white guilt, self care and white fragility in a way that spoke to me.
https://medium.com/@margostebbing/i...-white-guilt-and-white-fragility-76eeea262ec0
Wow. So this non-white woman comes across as quite a bigot herself. Really, she's playing the "cultural appropriation" card because a white woman in her group likes to do yoga? She's upset that a white woman in her group isn't into social justice 24/7/365 and wants to maintain some kind of balance in her own life? Granted, I find the whole bath-in-rose-petals thing silly, but what this blogger has done is tar all white women with the brush she's using against the women in her group who she feels are not giving their energies 24/7/365.
It seems to me that she doesn't think white women have any right to involve ourselves in social justice issues because her perception is that no white woman ever goes through problems that are unjust. Okay, fine. The next time I get an email from Amnesty International, asking me to sign a petition or write a letter on behalf of a non-white person, I'll just delete it because my "white privilege" means I really don't care, that it's just a hobby and I'd rather be doing yoga or bathing in rose petals.
Does this woman have knowledge of what her white colleagues' personal lives are like? They may be in situations that preclude their working more hours on the group's work. There may be psychological reasons. There may be family obligations. And yeah, some may see it as one cause among several. Does that mean that what they do accomplish is meaningless? According to the blogger, white women who don't give 24/7/365 might as well not do anything at all.
Well, if that's her attitude, what is she doing in a "mixed race group" in the first place?
Oh, and this "white fragility" phrase is repugnant. Does she really think that Oprah Winfrey has never taken a bubble bath with expensive, frivolous soaps or oils? What about Michelle Obama? Or any other wealthy black woman?
You're welcome to consider yourself "guilty" and "fragile" and responsible for the actions of people centuries ago, and just for being born with the skin color you have, if you feel you really have to... but do not sit there and expect every other white person to follow suit, if we don't see it your way.
Still don't feel guilty. I do have a headache now though, so thanks for that. I do hope the white guilt thing becomes a point of ridicule in the future.
Agreed. The bigotry was just dripping from that blog post.
I guess I am secure enough to admit my privilege, to admit that my skin color affords me advantages that people of color don't get. It is not about feeling guilt, it is about taking responsibility. I have never understood why people get so offended by the word guilt, when it is really a stand in for words like responsibility. Is it more palatable if we talked about white responsibility?
Why is it that some here appear incapable of understanding that throwing the word "guilt" around is basically an accusation that people have committed a crime, or have done something immoral? Are you responsible for who your parents were? Did you choose to be born a white person?
I've stated this numerous times: I am not guilty for being born a white female in an average Western Canadian city. I'm not guilty for the acts of people in the past before I was born, or for the acts of people after that if I didn't know they happened (ie. the Sixties Scoop is something I just learned about last year; it's not something that was taught in Canadian history classes in school), or for the acts of people who I can't stop from doing what they do.
What I am responsible for is what
I do. I'm responsible for not actively seeking to make bad situations worse. I'm responsible for
acknowledging that oppression happened in the past and happens now.
I take voting extremely seriously. There's a party I never vote for here (two, actually; the provincial one is an offshoot of the federal one) that's anti-science, anti-choice, anti-same-sex marriage, anti-LGBT, anti-age-appropriate sex education, and would love to roll back all the social programs we have now. Some of the people in that party are determined to drag Canada back to the 1950s, and some of them are unabashed Trump fans. They praise Trump on the news sites, and say they wish Canada could be like the U.S., where certain demographics are having their rights slowly stripped away by oppressive legislation. My answer to them is this: Go outside. Turn south. Keep walking. Don't let the border hit you on the rear end as you cross. And don't come back. Canada does not need such people. Attitudes like theirs do not enhance our country.
The times I've felt shame for another person's actions are the times when people in my family said awful things; while I couldn't reason with my mother over her hatred of Indian/Pakistani people, I did manage to get my grandmother to delete the "n-word" from her vocabulary by explaining that it was no longer acceptable to use and that if she were to use it in public people would consider her a vulgar and terribly bigoted person.
Don't blame me for your headache. Take an aspirin, and next time don't read articles that you know will just make you angry to read.
Given that you posted the link with the intention of inducing people to read it, your "don't read articles that you know will just make you angry" is unreasonable.
The article didn't give me a headache, but it did make me disgusted... not with myself, but with the author.