• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Which series would you want next?

Which series would you want after Strange New Worlds?

  • Legacy

    Votes: 48 33.3%
  • Stargazer/Young Picard

    Votes: 5 3.5%
  • Rachel Garrett

    Votes: 17 11.8%
  • Romulan War/Birth of the Federation

    Votes: 23 16.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 51 35.4%

  • Total voters
    144
Sure it could. We got Kor's rehabilitation story in DS9.
Well sure, any series could do any story if they really want to. Enterprise did a story about the invention of velcro. But those Deep Space Nine stories were 30 years before Legacy's time, so it's pretty ancient history at this point.
 
Well sure, any series could do any story if they really want to. Enterprise did a story about the invention of velcro. But those Deep Space Nine stories were 30 years before Legacy's time, so it's pretty ancient history at this point.
Time travel or another Klingon sleeper ship and they have to make peace with the new century.
 
I get the impression the people hoping for Legacy to get made want it to be a very different series. Different tone, different characters, different setting, with all the new storytelling avenues that open up because of that.
Seems to me that those people just want a continuation of 90's Trek because that's what The Lord Terry told them he would give them. Nothing but follow-ups on things and characters from TNG, DS9 and Voyager.
 
It's been too long to hope Legacy will actually be a thing anymore. The hype was high when PIC S3 ended but now it seems like a pipedream.
Yeah I voted for Legacy on the poll but as long as we get a good show out of Academy I'll be content.
 
Seems to me that those people just want a continuation of 90's Trek because that's what The Lord Terry told them he would give them. Nothing but follow-ups on things and characters from TNG, DS9 and Voyager.

Yep. And I for one don’t need any of that.
 
Seems like this theoretical series is ticking all the right boxes.

[✓] Is different enough to Strange New Worlds to offer variety.
[✓] Appeals to a section of the fanbase that currently isn't being targeted by other shows.
[✓] May feature characters people already like and want to see more of.

To be honest, I personally found Picard to be a very dark and cynical show under all of its showrunners and I'd hope that any follow up series has a lot more of Lower Decks' and Prodigy's '90s Trek spirit to it. I think they can do better.
 
Seems like this theoretical series is ticking all the right boxes.

[✓] Is different enough to Strange New Worlds to offer variety.
[✓] Appeals to a section of the fanbase that currently isn't being targeted by other shows.
[✓] May feature characters people already like and want to see more of.

Well, let us all know when this hugely different show gets green-lit.
 
No one's expecting her to "eat shit just to get by." But turning down a lead role in an established franchise where she'd be reprising a fan favorite character isn't exactly the best decision out there, IMO of course.
It kinda feels like it. I just think people should respect her decision rather than comment on her age and the so-called limitations that comes with that. It's not something anyone would say to her on social media without upsetting her.
According to IMDB, her only work since Picard ended is a recurring role on Dark Winds and a voice role in an animated movie. I doubt those paid as much as this hypothetical Trek project which she would have been the lead on would have.
Granted.

No actress is obliged to to update her IMDB with upcoming projects, of course.
 
Excuse the double post. Too many notifications.
They do? It looks more like the studio wants to focus on SNW and SFA. And again I will ask, if they already have a show about a crew on an Enterprise seeking out strange new worlds, why would they need another show about a crew on an Enterprise seeking out strange new worlds?
We talked about it before.

1.I dont believe anything about the Enterprise-G would happen in conjunction with SNW.

2.The format is key.
We're two and a half months away from the two year anniversary of Picard season 3 starting to air.

Unlike SNW, there's been no whispers from behind the scenes that something was coming. I mean, the very fact they built the Bridge of the Enterprise in Toronto, was enough to tell you something was in the works. Plus, there was a genuine feeling of enthusiasm that you could feel brewing.

Legacy has none of that. Infact, there seem to have been actual pitches made that would totally negate the need for Legacy, if Jeri Ryan is to be believed.

Combine that with The God King Terry filling his slate with multiple projects with other studios. Projects that will take years.

I think the writing is on the wall.

If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I'll gladly admit it and watch whatever is produced, as always.
Time is a bit irrelevant in streaming Trek.

And I mentioned Matalas's lack of availability in the post I made.
 
It's been too long to hope Legacy will actually be a thing anymore. The hype was high when PIC S3 ended but now it seems like a pipedream.
Yeah I voted for Legacy on the poll but as long as we get a good show out of Academy I'll be content.
Despite my reservations around Legacy I do think it can still happen. There are just things in motion that necessitate a wait and see.

First, you have Starfleet Academy and that had been in development for a year when Picard Season 3 released. Section 31 was in a similar place so there was already some financial commitments.

Second, you have the merger talks which would have given some pause to anything not already cooking.

Third, you have Paramount in a really bad place financially. We might look back and say, "Of course Season 3 was a hit." But Matalas and company couldn't know that she would reasonably move on to the next project.

All that means is that Legacy might still be able to occur in time. It's not like Paramount is fast at anything.
 
Yeah, soon is just not an option. There  is enthusiasm for the project, both from fans and members of the Trek family, but whether or not that makes a difference is highly debatable.

Think back to 2018 when Section 31 was barely in the discussion stage.

 
It kinda feels like it. I just think people should respect her decision rather than comment on her age and the so-called limitations that comes with that. It's not something anyone would say to her on social media without upsetting her.
What? No one here is talking about her age or any limitations associated with it. The simple fact of the matter is, Jeri Ryan is a working actress who was presented with what many actors would consider a golden once in a lifetime opportunity and she turned it down for silly reasons.
No actress is obliged to to update her IMDB with upcoming projects, of course.
I mean, everyone does it, and Ryan's IMDB does list her upcoming projects anyway, the only one there is that animated movie I mentioned.
 
What? No one here is talking about her age or any limitations associated with it. The simple fact of the matter is, Jeri Ryan is a working actress who was presented with what many actors would consider a golden once in a lifetime opportunity and she turned it down for silly reasons.
There has been mention of her age a few pages back.

You may call It silly reasons, I beg to differ. What if the script was absolutely dire and she did us all a favour by turning it down? Let's just make something the the lead didn't think was worth her time, as I'm sure that'll do wonders for the franchise. :confused:
 
There has been mention of her age a few pages back.
That was probably me. What I was referring to was the inescapable truth that as women age in Hollywood, the less likely they are to be cast in various roles. I'm not saying that this is a good thing. It's a travesty. But that doesn't make it any less true.
 
What if the script was absolutely dire and she did us all a favour by turning it down?
In that case, why didn't she say she turned it down because the script was terrible instead of the reason she actually gave that she turned it down because Matalas wasn't involved? That's the reason she gave for turning it down, and that is a silly reason to turn down a once in a lifetime opportunity that most actors dream of.
 
That was probably me. What I was referring to was the inescapable truth that as women age in Hollywood, the less likely they are to be cast in various roles. I'm not saying that this is a good thing. It's a travesty. But that doesn't make it any less true.
She probably has enough integrity to not care about all that. A lot of actors and actresses are quite genuine in that sense.

It's ok for us to debate the advantages of taking on any old project, or the disadvantages of not, because we aren't her. But for her, this is her life. This is time she won't get back. Money isn't always a motivator when it comes to taking on a project that would burn years of your life away, especially when you've been in the industry for so long. And she doesn't appear to be destitute at the moment.
In that case, why didn't she say she turned it down because the script was terrible instead of the reason she actually gave that she turned it down because Matalas wasn't involved? That's the reason she gave for turning it down, and that is a silly reason to turn down a once in a lifetime opportunity that most actors dream of.
Diplomatic approach, it happens all the time. She doesn't appear to be nasty by nature and absolutely would've been aware of who wrote the pitch. So, why be cruel?

In her words.
But it just wasn’t me… It didn’t feel like the right kind of thing…
Grade A diplomacy, right there. That's certainly what it feels like to me. It's almost like a text book example of what many actors have said when they think a script is basically crap.

Guys, I know we won't find a way to agree on this, but what's done is done. There will be plenty more nails to hammer into the coffin of Star Trek Legacy as the years go by, but this abandoned project won't be the thing that buries the idea. It's going to be something else, by somebody else, starring somebody else. Just bide your time.
 
"There has been talk. And there was an idea that was actually pitched to me after Picard ended, which was not the Legacy show that I know the fans are asking for, that I want to do. But it just wasn’t me… It didn’t feel like the right kind of thing… But there has been talk. And if there is one thing I have learned with this franchise it is: never say never. You never know."
Revisiting this quote, it feels like Denise Crosby levels of hubris and stupidity, holy fuck! :lol:
Even if it was not Legacy she was offered the lead in an ongoing show, something most actors dream about.
The state of entertainment is very bad right now, and for working actors it's even worse.
Last I checked Tom Welling and Michael Rosenbaum were pitching a Smallville revival for the last three years, that's how bad it is in Hollywood.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top