Oh god no. That would only make it worseErm.. I'm pretty sure enterprise wasn't made by the BBCWhat about ENT wasn't a bland watered down BBC production.
If it were, I hope Ricky Gervais would be involved with that wig from Extras
It also helps to be able to understand things.
For me ENT jumped with the pilot. As soon as I heard that the Klingon's name was Klang I could her a metal trash can lid being slammed down and echoing endlessly (they actually called the fucking Klingon Klang?).
It also helps to be able to understand things.
Excellent advice.
I don't think any of you know the meaning of "jump the shark" or how to apply it to the Star Trek franchise. I am not even sure it applies at all. All series had high and low points, but never one defining moment where the quality never recovered and continued to spiral downward as a result of lack of interest or good ideas.
At the end of the day this thread is more about "my show was better," than which show jumped the shark. IMO, the term doesn't work.
I don't think any of you know the meaning of "jump the shark" or how to apply it to the Star Trek franchise. I am not even sure it applies at all. All series had high and low points, but never one defining moment where the quality never recovered and continued to spiral downward as a result of lack of interest or good ideas.
At the end of the day this thread is more about "my show was better," than which show jumped the shark. IMO, the term doesn't work.
I don't think any of you know the meaning of "jump the shark" or how to apply it to the Star Trek franchise. I am not even sure it applies at all. All series had high and low points, but never one defining moment where the quality never recovered and continued to spiral downward as a result of lack of interest or good ideas.
At the end of the day this thread is more about "my show was better," than which show jumped the shark. IMO, the term doesn't work.
I simply don't agree with this, it is a matter of opinion, IMO the quality did decline, and never did recover and everything else you said with Voyager. Not bashing the show, but there was already a quality Trek show on the air in DS9 and splitting the troops and diluting the franchise was a shark jumping moment for me and I think many more.
DS9 also ran conncurrent with the latter seasons of TNG. Wasn't that "splitting the troops and diluting the franchise" as well? (And I say this as a fan of DS9 and not a fan of Voyager)
I dont think we disagree.But that's not what Jump the Shark means. You have redefined it. Happy Days did that as a ratings stunt, which failed and the audience and quality of the show declined and never recovered.. This is also similar to the Cousin Oliver Method which performed the same function. Under those terms, Star Trek never really did that.
Here's a more complete definition:
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/jump-the-shark.html
The Jump the Shark concept has taken on a life of it's own since the Happy Days episode.
I think it's come to mean plot ideas that are so outrageous -or something that's been done to death to boost ratings.
Case in point- ratings are low, so have a baby, or bring a cute little kid-like Voyager bringing on the Borg children.
Or the inevitable time travel episode.
Or shrinking down to size.
Or growing old very fast.
Or becoming children again....
Or.... .............
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.