What's your "Ideal" Bridge Layout/Design for "Your StarShip"?

Discussion in 'Trek Tech' started by KamenRiderBlade, Sep 27, 2020.

  1. Colonel Midnight

    Colonel Midnight Vice Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Location:
    Colonel Midnight
    ^ Yes, typically.

    Cheers,
    -CM-
     
  2. RichT

    RichT Guest

    The operative word in my post was realistically. There's not much terribly realistic about Star Trek's ships, sadly.
     
  3. RichT

    RichT Guest

    In the case of this specific design it depends which website you read, though I'm happy to bow to your opinion as I'm not 100% sure how a bridge differs from a CIC. What would one do that the other wouldn't?
     
  4. Colonel Midnight

    Colonel Midnight Vice Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Location:
    Colonel Midnight
    ^ In a nutshell, the ship is driven from the Bridge, while CIC is an overall sensor collection area/Tactical command point. A lot of the info between the two is redundant, but there is a distinction.

    For example, during small boat operations like launching/recovering the boat, the Bridge would be the place putting the ship on course to launch/recover, direct the effort (I.e. tell the boat to come alongside, etc.), and do any maneuvers as such for the task/conditions at hand. CIC would just ‘know’ that the boat was being launched/recovered, but then would pass the course for the small boat to steer to its target, etc.

    That’s butchering it a bit for brevity’s sake and from a Coast Guard perspective vice U.S. Navy one, but I’m pretty sure they’re similar (and my apologies to any USN posters out there if I screwed it up. :)).

    The other big difference between the two locations was mentioned earlier up-thread, I think. During GQ/wartime ops, the CO is usually in CIC (seeing the overall picture) while the XO is typically on the Bridge, ‘driving’ the ship.

    Hope this helps and YMMV, of course.
    Cheers,
    -CM-
     
    DEWLine and RichT like this.
  5. at Quark's

    at Quark's Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    My question would be what advantages a spacious bridge would actually hvae. I mean, spacious lounges and crew quarters if your technology makes it possible, sure. But a bridge is focused on duty and it probably would be beneficial for efficiency to be "cramped", even if only to be able to quickly cast a look on another workstation, or take it over quickly in battle.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2020
  6. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    I think it has more to do with human psychology and comfort of not being crammed in like sardines.
     
    Mister Spock likes this.
  7. TommyR01D

    TommyR01D Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Location:
    UK
    My less-than-successful first thread was on this topic.
     
  8. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    Having it in the core of a tactical cube would be the safest place to be
     
  9. Nightfall to-Ennien

    Nightfall to-Ennien Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Location:
    USS Mercury
    In terms of layout, I like the Cerritos bridge from Lower Decks. It really feels like a less “grand”, workhorse counterpart to the Galaxy class bridge while maintaining a similar design philosophy, including the ramps, which I prefer to stairs for both accessibility and safety. Also, no great big MSD at the back, which always struck me as the least useful place for it.
     
    jackoverfull likes this.