the best roles tend to be characters that speak loud through being quiet and sensual, which is a huge aspect of being a woman.


the best roles tend to be characters that speak loud through being quiet and sensual, which is a huge aspect of being a woman.
the best roles tend to be characters that speak loud through being quiet and sensual, which is a huge aspect of being a woman.
![]()
Real women do not need to be confrontist to make a point or to make themselves heard.
Define 'best'. Your favourites? Sure. Most popular? Maybe not. Some popular female roles of the last fifteen years of cinema: The Bride (not quiet, very confrontational, definitely highly-strung), Trinity (very confrontational), Hermione Granger (not quiet, hardly sensual, quite highly-strung) Hit Girl (the antithesis of quiet and epitome of confrontation) Katniss Everdeen...If you look at the best female roles on the big screen, they are not highly strung women in tight uniform
Trek hasn't traditionally had much truck with how people, regardless of gender, would talk or behave in real life. How many guys do you know IRL who've delivered even one Kirkian sophomoric monologue about the virtues and vices of the human condition, never mind do it regularly?Taut and rigid characters like Seven and Kira would fail at the first hurdle, mainly because 99.9% of women you'd see in every day life would not talk or behave that way in any situation.
Real women can be and do whatever they want.Real women do not need to be confrontist to make a point or to make themselves heard.
Real women can be and do whatever they want.Real women do not need to be confrontist to make a point or to make themselves heard.
And what about Ripley? One of the most iconic and enduring female characters in cinema, almost unquestionably the most so in SF. Does Ripley speak loudly through being quiet and sensual? I don't think you can make any objectively persuasive claim of the kind you seem to be making.
Real women can be and do whatever they want.Real women do not need to be confrontist to make a point or to make themselves heard.
Of course they can do what they want.
The point I am trying to make is the hardcore fancination of characters like Kira and Seven what with their relentless confrontational, 'tough-chic' and stiff personas, this is an example of how not have female characters on the big screen.
It is unconvincing, unlikable and unappealing and causes needless attrition to the viewer.
You just don't need that sort of mediocrity in a reboot that was supposed to save Star Trek.
If Abrams and his gang had made a movie set post Nemesis, with a new crew, it would have been just as successful.
Kira and Seven what with their relentless confrontational, 'tough-chic' and stiff personas, this is an example of how not have female characters on the big screen.
It is unconvincing, unlikable and unappealing and causes needless attrition to the viewer.
So, your argument essentially is that "strong women" are off-putting, because men can't handle women who don't just roll over and meekly accept everything the big, strong men tell them to do?
Does it? I had a lot of the same problems with many of the female characters, particularly on DS9. "Tough chicks" as conceived by an all-male writing staff can indeed result in stiff and implausible characters. Then there were the "lipstick lesbians" of DS9's version of the Mirror Universe, who seemed to exist mainly because someone wanted to see Kira put the moves on Dax. "Intendent Kira" represented the conflation of homosexuality with general wickedness on a nearly Harkonnen level. Are you sure there's no stereotyping or sexism going on there?Do you realize how sexist that sounds?
If Abrams and his gang had made a movie set post Nemesis, with a new crew, it would have been just as successful.
No, it wouldn't have.
I've been a fan of TOS since 1966. Love Abrams's version.![]()
So, your argument essentially is that "strong women" are off-putting, because men can't handle women who don't just roll over and meekly accept everything the big, strong men tell them to do?
Do you realize how sexist that sounds?
Kira and Seven what with their relentless confrontational, 'tough-chic' and stiff personas, this is an example of how not have female characters on the big screen.
It is unconvincing, unlikable and unappealing and causes needless attrition to the viewer.
So, your argument essentially is that "strong women" are off-putting, because men can't handle women who don't just roll over and meekly accept everything the big, strong men tell them to do?
Is that what he's saying?
Does it? I had a lot of the same problems with many of the female characters, particularly on DS9. "Tough chicks" as conceived by an all-male writing staff can indeed result in stiff and implausible characters. Then there were the "lipstick lesbians" of DS9's version of the Mirror Universe, who seemed to exist mainly because someone wanted to see Kira out the moves on Dax. "Intendent Kira" represented the conflation of homosexuality with general wickedness on a nearly Harkonnen level. Are you sure there's no stereotyping or sexism going on there?Do you realize how sexist that sounds?
She doesn't squark or throw tantrums to be heard. Your very own example proves my point.
Was never a huge fan of either of those shows, especially not Voyager. Try again? I'm not making any kind of case for Kira or Seven, I'm not particularly fond of them. It's your asinine twaddle about 'quiet and sensual' women being greatly preferred in other media that I'm taking issue with.It is just your relentless sentimental bias from watching DS9 and VOY that makes you fail to differentiate successful Hollywood movie characters to mediocre ones from TV shows that got cancelled.
I understand plenty, like how backpedaling from a thoughtless and tasteless broad generalization makes one look unsavory.Well that is a shame Clegg you fail to understand what that means.
I understand plenty, like how backpedaling from a thoughtless and tasteless broad generalization makes one look unsavory.Well that is a shame Clegg you fail to understand what that means.
But anh165's original point was made so broadly as to denigrate all strong female characters, not just ones written or portrayed poorly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.