I mean, if criminality is categorically defined as an illness, why have trials? It's fairly irrelevant what the patient has done or not done, and the treatment is unlikely to do him or her any harm even if applied without cause. And the "with/without cause" question is something only medical experts can answer - people enforcing or interpreting law would be badly out of their depth there.
Surely depriving an innocent (or "healthy?") person of his freedom for 6 months is punishment in and of itself, even if the corrective treatment is not harmful. You would at least need to prove that the illness exists before forcing an individual to undergo treatment.
I think you would still need courts in some form, to determine if the "symptom" had manifested itself.
Not a trial, because trials adjudicate guilt or liability, but yeah, I'm sure even the Feds need some kind of judicial proceeding to determine the involuntary confinement of a citizen. I simply don't see any free society without some kind of prohibition on deprivation of liberty without due process of law, even if the deprivation is medical in nature.
Devil Eyes said:It's not "attempted genocide". It's genocide. If you're referring to the fact that she didn't manage to kill all Cardassians, well, nobody in the recent history has managed to kill all members of a particular ethnic/national/religious group, but that doesn't mean they aren't guilty of the crime of genocide.
Well, it was Garak, who managed to kill nobody, and insofar as genocide has elements I think someone still has to die. So I guess it's just attempted murder?
Edit: actually, on reflection, I can really only assume that Garak must have been charged solely with screwing around as a civilian in a restricted area, and not with the quantum torpedo thing.
Timo said:But reading on, I see you have wondered about that as well...
Yeah. Although we've never really seen much of the Federation's mainstream judicial system. We've seen Starfleet's procedures, which are laughably informal and just absolutely impossible to take too seriously if you know just a bit about law or legal ethics. I mean, I truly hope that civilian justice in the Federation is not meted out with such travesties of justice as the proceedings in "Measure of a Man." That thing is just... not even wrong. Oh, and not they need apply to the future, but it's hilarious to watch the proceeding with the current Federal Rules of Evidence in mind and just see the twenty or thirty things that the completely untrained "attorneys" would be laughed out of any real courtroom for.
Apropos of nothing, I also like to think that civilian judges look like Q from Farpoint.

Last edited: