In the relaunch novels she's being held in a Maximum Security Prison.
I find that the backing off of the psychiatric approach to criminality from TOS to adopt a basically contemporary penal philosophy was one of the bigger failures of modern Trek.
She agreed to stand trial for war crimes ... Most likely due to the genocide against Cardassia.
Don't know what her actual sentence was. Her prison time would depend on the average Founder lifespan, I assume.
Didn't Tom Paris spend like two years in a prison in New Zealand? I mean, it was a nicer prison than contemporary ones, but it was never spoken of (that I recall) as a mental health facility, like Tantalus* and Elba were.Yet did modern Trek go contemporary? They have "sentences" of six months for everything, be it smuggling band-aids or attempting genocide. Those don't sound at all like punitive jail sentences - they appear to be in the best spirits of "Dagger of the Mind" or "Whom Gods Destroy" where criminals get taken in to an institution to facilitate their treatment, not to punish them with loss of freedom.I find that the backing off of the psychiatric approach to criminality from TOS to adopt a basically contemporary penal philosophy was one of the bigger failures of modern Trek.
We never got his sentence length, I'm afraid. Nor the nature of his imprisonment. We don't even know what Janeway really promised him - a shortened sentence, a clearing of criminal/mental record, a restoration of some sort of status or another? She said she'd hire him for the job of tracking down Chakotay, then "cut him loose", which may mean just about anything.Didn't Tom Paris spend like two years in a prison in New Zealand
Garak did, for her attempted use of the guns of the Defiant in "Broken Link". And yes, I'd definitely also want to see the counseling sessions where the UFP experts try to fix the tailor's headspace...Who got six months for attempted genocide? I want to see that.![]()
Sometimes I wonder if even the UFP has customary internal law. I mean, if criminality is categorically defined as an illness, why have trials? It's fairly irrelevant what the patient has done or not done, and the treatment is unlikely to do him or her any harm even if applied without cause. And the "with/without cause" question is something only medical experts can answer - people enforcing or interpreting law would be badly out of their depth there.Somehow it doesn't seem to me that the Trek universe even has customary international law
I mean, if criminality is categorically defined as an illness, why have trials? It's fairly irrelevant what the patient has done or not done, and the treatment is unlikely to do him or her any harm even if applied without cause. And the "with/without cause" question is something only medical experts can answer - people enforcing or interpreting law would be badly out of their depth there.
It's not "attempted genocide". It's genocide. If you're referring to the fact that she didn't manage to kill all Cardassians, well, nobody in the recent history has managed to kill all members of a particular ethnic/national/religious group, but that doesn't mean they aren't guilty of the crime of genocide.Who got six months for attempted genocide? I want to see that.![]()
Um, what would the point of a law system if the punishment were to release a convicted criminal, so they could do whatever they like all over again? It's the point of the penal law to protect the society and stop the criminal from committing crimes again?might have kicked her out an airlock. since founders need no oxygen or anything else to breathe, and no energy supply of any sort, and are also immune against the cold of space, she's pobably floating somewhere in the alpha quadrant. unless she shapeshifted into a warp capable vessel and returned to the great link.
So what are you saying - the Founders need to be above the law and have a privileged position in relation to everyone else, basically being allowed to do whatever they please, even commit genocide and mass murder, for fear that the solids do not annoy the Founders in any way?As for the female Founder... it wouldn't make any sense to punish her. "Solids" punishing the "Founder", that would only confirm every prejudice the shape shifters have against them.
So what are you saying - the Founders need to be above the law and have a privileged position in relation to everyone else, basically being allowed to do whatever they please, even commit genocide and mass murder, for fear that the solids do not annoy the Founders in any way?As for the female Founder... it wouldn't make any sense to punish her. "Solids" punishing the "Founder", that would only confirm every prejudice the shape shifters have against them.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.