Enterprise is certainly relevant, in the grand scheme of things. Whatever might have been said in TOS must be interpreted in the context of *all* Trek history - even ENT.
Enterprise is certainly relevant, in the grand scheme of things. Whatever might have been said in TOS must be interpreted in the context of *all* Trek history - even ENT.
![]()
Welcome to the BBS Lt. Tyler. You make a good point about the on-screen dialog, which appeared in the aired two-part episode "The Menagerie," thus becoming part of "cannnnnnon." However, I don't think the writers ever intended for viewers to dissect such things in great detail as fans tend to do nowadays.
Nah, you just want to roll over and go to sleep before canon is finished.Welcome to the BBS Lt. Tyler. You make a good point about the on-screen dialog, which appeared in the aired two-part episode "The Menagerie," thus becoming part of "cannnnnnon." However, I don't think the writers ever intended for viewers to dissect such things in great detail as fans tend to do nowadays.
I'm part of the "screw canon" brigade. If something doesn't make sense, it either needs to be reinterpreted or thrown out entirely.
Just a throw away piece a dialog from the first pilot. People have got to stop treating every line of dialog like it was written in stone.
Excuse me. That is NOT a throwaway piece of dialog. It is established FACT in the Star Trek universe. It is canon. If the time barrier had been broken prior to 2236 as Star Trek:Enterprise and First Contact establishes then it was not be news to the crew of the SS Columbia in 2254.
Canon maybe concrete, but continuity is fluid. It can, is and will be overwritten. Otherwise we would be enjoying the adventures of the 22nd Century United Earth ship, Enterprise with it's part Vulcanian First Officer Spock and Commanding Officer James R. Kirk operating under the authority of the UESPA. A lot of dialog is throwaway. One off references meant to add a little extra verisimilitude to the proceedings. Some don't stick to wall and drop off.Warp drive was discovered by Zephram Cochrane over 150 years prior to TOS.
Zefram Cochrane of Alpha Centuri ...
the discoverer of the space warp?
That's right, Captain.
But that's impossible. Zefram Cochrane died 150 years ago.
Vina's ship crashed 18 years before "The Cage". Add on the 13 years beween "The Cage" and TOS you have 31 years. Not even close to the preWarp time frame of 150 years ago.
TOS does in fact take place in the 22nd century.Just a throw away piece a dialog from the first pilot. People have got to stop treating every line of dialog like it was written in stone.
Excuse me. That is NOT a throwaway piece of dialog. It is established FACT in the Star Trek universe. It is canon. If the time barrier had been broken prior to 2236 as Star Trek:Enterprise and First Contact establishes then it was not be news to the crew of the SS Columbia in 2254.
I'll just quote myself from 2008:
Canon maybe concrete, but continuity is fluid. It can, is and will be overwritten. Otherwise we would be enjoying the adventures of the 22nd Century United Earth ship, Enterprise with it's part Vulcanian First Officer Spock and Commanding Officer James R. Kirk operating under the authority of the UESPA. A lot of dialog is throwaway. One off references meant to add a little extra verisimilitude to the proceedings. Some don't stick to wall and drop off.Warp drive was discovered by Zephram Cochrane over 150 years prior to TOS.
Zefram Cochrane of Alpha Centuri ...
the discoverer of the space warp?
That's right, Captain.
But that's impossible. Zefram Cochrane died 150 years ago.
Vina's ship crashed 18 years before "The Cage". Add on the 13 years beween "The Cage" and TOS you have 31 years. Not even close to the preWarp time frame of 150 years ago.
The first explicitly stated date is 2364, in TNG: The Neutral Zone, a series created, produced, and overseen by Roddenberry. Early advertising publicity, including the promo on debut night of the first episode of the series announced that 78 years had passed since the original adventures, which puts us in 2268, the 23rd century. The most recent film prior to TNG was STiv:The Voyage Home, but we don't know if it's referring to the films or the series. Allowing slightly over the 15 years mentioned in STii when Kirk had last seen Khan, we're still in the 23rd century.TOS does in fact take place in the 22nd century.
TOS: The table has 4 legs and is in front of the couch and is made of wood from the planet Altair XXI.Whatever might have been said in TOS must be interpreted in the context of *all* Trek history - even ENT. If a film or series made after TOS, said that warp drive was invented in 2063, then it bloody well was.
TNG+: The table in front of the couch is really from the planet Deneb II and has an offset invisible 5th leg that has been time shifted to 3 minutes in the past due to a photon-induced light-refraction from the polarized deflector shield operated by the tiny pink elephant standing on it in its pajamas - you know, the ones with the little footies and back-flap that have been regulation attire since World War IV.
You tell me.What the hell does that even mean, anyway?
I hate canon wars.
Just a throw away piece a dialog from the first pilot. People have got to stop treating every line of dialog like it was written in stone.
Dudes, keep in mind that Beaker hates any Trek after TOS, that's what he's on about.
My brain hurts...
Warp drive was discovered by Zephram Cochrane over 150 years prior to TOS.
Zefram Cochrane of Alpha Centuri ...
the discoverer of the space warp?
That's right, Captain.
But that's impossible. Zefram Cochrane died 150 years ago.
Vina's ship crashed 18 years before "The Cage". Add on the 13 years beween "The Cage" and TOS you have 31 years. Not even close to the preWarp time frame of 150 years ago.
Valid points, but those do not support the contention that Enterprise can be authoritative as to TOS. As for whether TNG can, we'd have a long night ahead of us, but that is not the present argument.
Who cares? TOS is not the only Trek. In terms of canon, it is no more or less valid than any other Trek TV series or film. They are all equal contributors to canon. Even if you believe that anything other than TOS sucks, and thus you intend to ignore it, that doesn't change anything.
The first explicitly stated date is 2364, in TNG: The Neutral Zone, a series created, produced, and overseen by Roddenberry. Early advertising publicity, including the promo on debut night of the first episode of the series announced that 78 years had passed since the original adventures, which puts us in 2268, the 23rd century. The most recent film prior to TNG was STiv:The Voyage Home, but we don't know if it's referring to the films or the series. Allowing slightly over the 15 years mentioned in STii when Kirk had last seen Khan, we're still in the 23rd century.TOS does in fact take place in the 22nd century.
All we have in TOS seem to be approximations in dialogue.
Kirk to Khan in "Space Seed"-- 'About two centuries, we estimate.'
Col. Fellini to Kirk in "Tomorrow is Yesterday"-- 'I'm going to lock you up for 200 years.' Kirk says 'That ought to be just about right.'
In "Metamorphosis", we're told Zefrem Cochrane died 150 years ago, which would have been the early 2100s, or the 22nd century.
They never expected us to be analyzing any of this stuff 50 years later.
"The time barrier" is obviously relates to speed when you look at the context of the line. But if he means Warp 8 is now standard, instead of the Warp 7 engines that have been Starfleet standard since the 2160s, why call it "the time barrier"? Is there some inexplicable Warp 8 "barrier" similar to the Warp 2 "barrier"?
TOS does in fact take place in the 22nd century.
Welcome to the BBS Lt. Tyler. You make a good point about the on-screen dialog, which appeared in the aired two-part episode "The Menagerie," thus becoming part of "cannnnnnon." However, I don't think the writers ever intended for viewers to dissect such things in great detail as fans tend to do nowadays.
Also, going forward, you may not want to reply to threads that are more than a few weeks old. Notice that this one is from 2008 (seven years ago). The discussion was already long gone, dead, and buried. A forum moderator will probably be along shortly to lock this thread, as that is standard operating procedure here.
Kor
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.