It is just that I notice these things and care. What you said is like the purpose of this thread (you misspoke just like Morrow): Morrow's false statement.Oops. Typo. I of course meant 2280. Fixed now.
@PhaserLightShow can't edit his posts.
It is just that I notice these things and care. What you said is like the purpose of this thread (you misspoke just like Morrow): Morrow's false statement.Oops. Typo. I of course meant 2280. Fixed now.
What does he say?Icheb specifically gives the date in Voyager that TMP happens, but ignore that if you must.
That the Enterprise is "almost 20 years old". A false statement (the Enterprise is almost 35 years old).What does he say?
Not Morrow, Icheb.That the Enterprise is "almost 20 years old". A false statement (the Enterprise is almost 35 years old).
Why does that point to 2273? If he commanded another five-year mission it might as well be 2278.2273, which lines up nicely with the series and the line from Kirk serving 2.5 years behind a desk that I mentioned posts ago, which would have been after his promotion and the slow dismissal of the crew after 2270's return to Earth.
Icheb specifically gives the date in Voyager that TMP happens, but ignore that if you must.
What does he say?
2273, which lines up nicely with the series and the line from Kirk serving 2.5 years behind a desk that I mentioned posts ago, which would have been after his promotion and the slow dismissal of the crew after 2270's return to Earth.
chakoteya.net said:ICHEB: Though it was a blatant violation of the Prime Directive, Kirk saved the Pelosians from extinction, just as he had the Baezians and the Chenari many years earlier. Finally, in the year 2270, Kirk completed his historic five year mission and one of the greatest chapters in Starfleet history came to a close. A new chapter began when Kirk regained command of the Enterprise.
JANEWAY: How many more chapters are there?
ICHEB: Thirty four.
JANEWAY: This was supposed to be a twenty minute presentation.
ICHEB: I was trying to be thorough. I could shorten the report.
JANEWAY: That won't be necessary. You obviously know the subject matter. Congratulations, Cadet. You have just passed Early Starfleet History.
ICHEB: Thank you, Captain.
A guy on Voyager Chemahkuu mentioned, who had said something relating to the date of V'Ger incident. Or so I understood it.Icheb?
Commodore Decker is an Admiral (lower Rear Admiral by TNG standards) and commands the Constellation.Why does that point to 2273? If he commanded another five-year mission it might as well be 2278.
Thing is, in either case there's going to be long period of time we don't hear about, be it before or after TMP. If it is before, then it is easy to assume that Kirk commanded the Enterprise, if it is after, that becomes much more difficult assumption, as admirals don't tend to command ships in Trek (except temporally.)
Temporally?Why does that point to 2273? If he commanded another five-year mission it might as well be 2278.
Thing is, in either case there's going to be long period of time we don't hear about, be it before or after TMP. If it is before, then it is easy to assume that Kirk commanded the Enterprise, if it is after, that becomes much more difficult assumption, as admirals don't tend to command ships in Trek (except temporally.)
Well, that's actually a good point. Shit.The only justification I've read for why people think that wouldn't work is that in TMP, Kirk references his "five years out there", which seems to imply he only commanded one five-year mission.
Commodore is not an Admiral, more like senior Captain. That the rank later got replaced with an Admiral rank doesn't change that. If we believe the background material the rank of Commodore existed during TMP. Kirk was a Rear Admiral (no halves.)Commodore Decker is an Admiral (lower Rear Admiral by TNG standards) and commands the Constellation.
Temporarily.Temporally?
Well, it is the only thing that establishes that there wasn't a second five-year mission.One of many but yeah.
All this just establishes that the film happens about three years after their last mission, but had there been another five-year mission, it could have been in 2275, the film taking place in 2278.After the 5 year mission, Kirk is promoted and given a desk job which he eventually occupies for 2 and a half years, made pretty FUCKING CLEAR in TMP has him aching to be on a ship again after that little time because he's going stir crazy not being in space. The Enterprise was anchored and the given an 18 month refit which could even have meant to be 2 years given the lines from Scotty, having to shove her out early because the rest of the fleet was playing chicken shit again.
It originally said "temporally".Commodore is not an Admiral, more like senior Captain. That the rank later got replaced with an Admiral rank doesn't change that. If we believe the background material the rank of Commodore existed during TMP. Kirk was a Rear Admiral (no halves.)
Temporarily.
But fine. Kirk's statement that there was only on five-year mission is clear enough. So what did the Enterprise do between those twelve years between TMP and TWOK?
Kirk leaves Starfleet at one point, returning to his farm in Iowa and meeting a woman called Antonia who loves eggs. Eventually he decides to break her heart and return to Starfleet in around 2284 I think. I worked out why years ago but don't have my reasoning to hand. Wait, it was because it was "nine years ago" from his point of view.But fine. Kirk's statement that there was only on five-year mission is clear enough. So what did the Enterprise do between those twelve years between TMP and TWOK?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.